多重逻辑下的城市专车治理困境研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 03:25

本文选题：专车现象　切入点：共享经济　出处：《公共管理学报》2016年04期

【摘要】："技术红利"、"非法客运"的双重标签让专车治理成为了城市管理的新挑战,政府治理资源投入和专车数量、企业跨界行为、公众态度的反差凸显了专车治理困境。本研究将"专车现象"纳入多重逻辑分析框架,尝试挖掘专车治理困境形成的根源。研究表明,"国家的逻辑"决定了既"肯定"又"否定"的"两面性"政策取向,"科层制的逻辑"激励了选择性、运动式执法,两者相互叠加产生了政策"缝隙",为"效率的逻辑"提供了运作空间。"共享经济"提升了专车供给效率,破解了管制的"政府失灵",但政策"缝隙"下"效率的逻辑"却可能孕育"市场失灵"。本研究为技术介入后的城市治理困境提供了机理性的解释,也拓展了城市研究的分析路径。效率与风险的平衡、"政府失灵"与"市场失灵"、双边市场中公平竞争等现实问题仍然有待于进一步探索。
[Abstract]:The dual labels of "technical dividend" and "illegal passenger transport" have made the governance of special cars a new challenge to urban management. The contrast of public attitude highlights the plight of special bus governance. In this study, the phenomenon of "special car" is included in the framework of multiple logical analysis. The study shows that the "logic of the country" determines the policy orientation of "both affirmative" and "negative", and that the logic of "hierarchy" encourages selective and moving law enforcement. The superposition of the two creates a policy "gap", which provides operational space for the "logic of efficiency". "sharing economy" enhances the efficiency of the supply of special buses. The "government failure" of regulation has been solved, but the "logic of efficiency" under the policy "gap" may give birth to "market failure". This study provides a mechanical explanation for the plight of urban governance after technological intervention. The balance between efficiency and risk, "government failure" and "market failure", and fair competition in bilateral market still need to be further explored.
【作者单位】：同济大学经济与管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金面上项目(71473177) 国家社科重大招标项目(13&ZD041)
【分类号】：F572;D922.296

【相似文献】