城市公共交通规制政策的经济学分析

发布时间：2019-03-07 09:23

【摘要】：管制、放松管制和竞争性招标是城市公共交通产业可供选择的三个政策模型,就政策的实践效果而言,竞争性招标明显优于管制与放松管制。但是,目前有关城市公共交通的理论却无法对该产业的政策选择提供清晰明确的判别标准。本文以服务提供过程中生产者与消费者不可分离这一特征为切入点,通过对城市公共交通产业(巴士产业)技术经济特征的重新阐释,不仅证明了竞争性招标政策的合意性,而且还说明了为什么有关规模经济的经验测量会得出相互矛盾的结果。并提出从重组巴士产业结构、扩展竞标范围、理顺政企关系和提升合约设计与监管水平四个方面来完善中国城市公共交通产业竞争性招标政策建议。
[Abstract]:Regulation, deregulation and competitive bidding are three policy models available to urban public transport industry. As far as the practical effect of policies is concerned, competitive bidding is obviously superior to regulation and deregulation. However, the current urban public transport theory can not provide a clear and clear criteria for the policy choice of the industry. Based on the characteristics that producers and consumers cannot be separated in the process of service delivery, this paper reinterprets the technical and economic characteristics of the urban public transport industry (bus industry), which proves not only the concurrence of competitive bidding policy, but also the technical and economic characteristics of the urban public transport industry (bus industry). It also explains why empirical measurements of economies of scale produce contradictory results. Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the competitive bidding policy of urban public transport industry in China from four aspects: restructuring the bus industry structure, expanding the scope of competitive bidding, straightening out the relationship between government and enterprise, and improving the level of contract design and supervision.
【作者单位】：哈尔滨工业大学管理学院;
【分类号】：F571

【相似文献】