中日两国农村地区旅游开发模式比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-19 00:16

本文选题：中国　切入点：日本　出处：《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：随着经济和旅游业的发展以及城乡差别的进一步扩大,日本政府开始关注和着力农村地区旅游资源的开发问题,由此摸索出独具特色的开发模式,如"菅平方式""麻绩方式""浪合村方式""黑姬方式"和"第三部门方式";在我国,同样形成了很有特色的旅游开发模式,如"栾川模式""婺源模式""宁波模式""贵州模式"以及"梦泉(村)模式""潘垫(村)模式"等。从中可以看到两国的模式各有特色,最大区别则在于土地利用问题和政府干预的程度不同。日本政府和地方为了促进旅游事业的发展,允许多元化的开发主体的介入,特别是对以往的"土地规制"采取了"缓和"措施,由此加快了农村地区旅游开发的进程。而我国,目前开始实施"土地流转"政策,激活了土地市场与地区经济。由此可见两国政府以及地方政府在其中所发挥的重要作用。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and the development of tourism and further expand the gap between urban and rural areas, the Japanese government began to focus on rural areas and pay attention to the problems of development of tourism resources, thus find out the unique pattern of development, such as "Jian Ping" "Ma Ji" "Lang Village" "our way" and "the third sector"; in China, the same form of tourism development mode is very distinctive, such as "Luanchuan mode" and "Wuyuan mode" "Ningbo model" and "Guizhou mode" and "the fountain of dreams (Village)" Pan Dian model "(Village) mode. Can be seen from the two models are different, the biggest difference is that the problems of land use and the degree of government intervention. The government and local in order to promote the development of tourism, allowing the diversified development of the main intervention, especially for the" land regulation "adopted" easing "measures, thus speeding up the tourism development in rural area However, our country has begun to implement the "land transfer" policy, which has activated the land market and the regional economy. It shows that the two governments and local governments play an important role in it.

【作者单位】：南昌大学经济与管理学院旅游管理系;
【基金】：江西省经济社会发展重大招标课题“江西省开展旅游扶贫的战略思想与实现途径研究”(12ZD03)
【分类号】：F592.7

【参考文献】