“范式争鸣”在旅游研究中的应用——以“本真性”旅游研究为例

发布时间：2018-04-05 14:11

本文选题：范式争鸣　切入点：本体论　出处：《旅游学刊》2013年01期

【摘要】：为了展现"范式争鸣"如何推动旅游学术研究向纵深发展,文章首先对库恩的科学革命与顾巴的范式四分类进行了概念澄清,接着以顾巴的"本体论—认识论—方法论"三论一体的范式观为基础,提出社会科学的"范式连续统"及"范式争鸣"理念,然后以"本真性"旅游研究为例,展现了"范式争鸣"激发理论建构、推动知识发展的历程。最后文章指出:(1)由于研究对象的属性特质,旅游社会科学研究既需要追求"客观"、"中立"的实证—后实证主义范式,亦需要建立提倡"反思"、"批判"、"辩证"、"理解"的各种新兴范式;(2)能够基于相互了解而达成范式间的有效对话是"范式争鸣"的必要前提,为此,旅游研究者应树立基于范式观的研究质量评价标准。"范式争鸣"正是通过多范式视角全方位地发现谜题、破解谜题、建构理论、发展知识来推动旅游社会科学向纵深发展的。
[Abstract]:In order to show how "Paradigm contention" promotes the development of tourism academic research in depth, this paper firstly clarifies Kuhn's scientific revolution and Gu Ba's four categories of paradigm.On the basis of Guba's paradigm view of "ontology, epistemology and methodology", this paper puts forward the concept of "paradigm continuum" and "paradigm contention" in social science, and then takes the tourism study of "authenticity" as an example.It shows the process of "Paradigm contention" arousing the theoretical construction and promoting the development of knowledge.Finally, the article points out that because of the characteristics of the object of study, tourism social science research needs to pursue the positivist paradigm of "objective" and "neutral".It is also necessary to establish new paradigms that promote "reflection", "criticism", "dialectics" and "understanding".) effective dialogue among paradigms based on mutual understanding is a necessary prerequisite for "paradigm contention".Tourism researchers should establish research quality evaluation standards based on paradigm view. ""Paradigm contention" is to find riddles, solve puzzles, construct theories and develop knowledge to promote the development of tourism social sciences.
【作者单位】：中山大学管理学院;
【分类号】：F592

【参考文献】