乡村旅游社区参与模式比较研究——以浙江省三个村落为例

发布时间：2019-03-22 06:38

【摘要】：有效、公平的社区参与是旅游业可持续发展的关键要素。本研究运用比较分析法、实地考察和文献分析等相结合的方法,从社区参与的角度选择浙江省衢州市柯城区七里乡黄土岭村、临安市太湖源镇白沙村、富阳市东洲街道黄公望村三个典型案例进行比较研究,提炼出基层组织引导、企业(景区)带动、社区主导三种典型社区参与模式,并对这三种模式的共性、特点和存在的问题进行了比较分析。研究结果表明:三种模式的参与主体多元化;社区参与内容较为单一,参与层次浅;社区参与的程度依发展阶段而有所不同;社区受益主要源自基础设施条件的改善,就业和自主创业机会的获得和培训教育机会的提供等。总体而言,社区参与的有效性、公平性与旅游业所处的发展阶段、社区能力建设息息相关。
[Abstract]:Effective and fair community participation is a key element of sustainable tourism development. Using the method of comparative analysis, on-the-spot investigation and literature analysis, this study chooses Huangtuling Village, Qili Township, Kecheng District, Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province, and Bai Sha Village, Taihu Yuan Town, Linan City, Zhejiang Province, from the perspective of community participation. Three typical cases of Huanggongwang Village in Dongzhou Street of Fuyang City are compared and studied, and three typical community participation models, which are guided by grass-roots organizations, driven by enterprises (scenic spots) and dominated by communities, are extracted, and the commonality of these three models is given. The characteristics and existing problems are compared and analyzed. The results show that: the participants of the three models are diversified; the content of community participation is relatively single and the level of participation is shallow; the degree of community participation varies according to the stage of development; Community benefits are mainly due to improved infrastructure conditions, access to employment and self-employment opportunities, and training and education opportunities. Overall, the effectiveness and fairness of community participation are closely related to the development stage of tourism and community capacity-building.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学地理科学学院;浙江旅游职业学院旅游规划系;
【基金】：杭州市哲学社会科学规划项目,项目编号:D12YJ14 浙江省教育厅科研项目,项目编号:Y201121156
【分类号】：F592.7

【参考文献】