农业的“规模”之争与“适度”之困

发布时间：2018-03-17 12:12

本文选题：适度规模　切入点：规模经济　出处：《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目前,学界对规模效益并没有统一的衡量标准。在中国,用土地生产率来衡量规模效益更符合人多地少的国情。文章从马克思主义传统和恰亚诺夫传统对大生产和小生产的经典辩论开始,落脚到阿马蒂亚·森对土地规模—土地生产率逆向关系的讨论,指出小规模农业在土地生产率上存在对规模经营的优势,但随着生物化学技术的采用、劳动力向非农产业转移等,逐渐打破了土地生产力和劳动力投入的界限,这种优势可能被弱化。在中国,适度规模可能存在,但它并不是一成不变的,而是深深嵌入到了特定的时空条件中,随技术等因素的变化而变化。并且,规模经济不只是经济概念,还是社会概念,小规模农业对社会公正、环境生态可持续、社会保障和社会稳定等维度具有正面意义。
[Abstract]:At present, there is no uniform measure of economies of scale in academic circles. In China, Using land productivity to measure economies of scale is more in line with the national conditions of more people and less land. This article begins with the classic debate on large-scale production and small-scale production in the Marxist tradition and the Chayanov tradition. And I went to Amartya Sen to talk about the inverse relationship between land scale and land productivity, and point out that small-scale agriculture has advantages over scale management in terms of land productivity, but with the adoption of biochemistry, The transfer of labor to non-agricultural industries has gradually broken the boundary between land productivity and labor input, and this advantage may be weakened. In China, moderate scale may exist, but it is not inflexible. And scale economy is not only an economic concept, but also a social concept, small-scale agriculture is social justice, environmental and ecological sustainability, but also deeply embedded in the specific space-time conditions, and changes with the change of technology and other factors, and scale economy is not only an economic concept, but also a social concept, small scale agriculture to social justice, environmental and ecological sustainability, The dimensions of social security and social stability have positive significance.
【作者单位】：中国农业大学人文与发展学院;
【分类号】：F323

【相似文献】