民勤绿洲边缘区农户生计脆弱性和恢复力的实证研究

发布时间：2018-03-18 21:17

本文选题：民勤绿洲边缘区　切入点：农村农户　出处：《兰州大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：生计是集成了生态环境和社会经济价值的系统,强调脆弱性分析和缓解的脆弱性分析方法需要对生计的脆弱性和恢复力给予更多地关注。但是,由于相关经验研究的缺乏,使得生计脆弱性和恢复力在理解上存在限制。而在本研究中,以民勤绿洲边缘区农户为研究对象,对于其生计状况的调查分析呈现出当地农户生计在环境变化和政策限制下的变化发展和适应恢复。研究结果表明,在脆弱的生态环境下,当地农户在生计资本上存在缺陷,并且农户自身在获取生计资源能力上也存在局限性。这些表明当地农户受到了环境和政策变化的强烈干扰,并且被削弱了反应和处理这些干扰的能力,整个生计呈现出脆弱性的状况。另一方面,通过分析,研究发现农户在政策的支持下,在生计策略上调整了种植结构,积极发展蔬菜大棚,主动削减养殖业支出,另外增加了劳务输出,更多的家庭参与到外出务工当中,获得了更多非农劳动的收入,农户在以上生计策略上的改变是适应了其生计资本的结构性改变。农户生计的自适应表现出了当地农户的生计恢复力。研究还发现,存在贫富差异的农户在脆弱性上表现出了显著地差异,较贫困的农户生计脆弱性更高。但是,由于较贫困的农户在生计策略上更加多样和灵活,其与非贫困农户之间在生计恢复力上并没有明显的差异。因此,从当地农户的实践来看,生计的高脆弱性并不必然导致低恢复力,两者之间关系要结合地方的具体实践进行分析。
[Abstract]:Livelihoods are systems that integrate ecological and socio-economic values, emphasizing that vulnerability analysis and vulnerability analysis approaches to mitigation require greater attention to the vulnerability and resilience of livelihoods... however, owing to a lack of relevant empirical research, In this study, the farmers in the marginal area of Minqin oasis were taken as the research objects. The survey and analysis of their livelihood conditions show that the livelihoods of local farmers change, develop and adapt to the environment changes and policy constraints. The results show that in the fragile ecological environment, the local farmers have deficiencies in livelihood capital. And the limitations of farmers themselves in terms of access to livelihood resources show that local farmers are strongly disturbed by environmental and policy changes and have been weakened to respond to and deal with these disruptions, On the other hand, through analysis, it is found that farmers, supported by policies, have adjusted their planting structure in their livelihood strategies, actively developed vegetable sheds, and actively reduced the expenditure on aquaculture. In addition, the export of labor services has been increased, and more families have been involved in migrant workers, thus obtaining more income from non-farm labor. The above changes in farmers' livelihood strategies are adapted to the structural changes in their livelihood capital. The adaptation of farmers' livelihoods shows the livelihood resilience of local farmers. Farmers with differences between rich and poor showed significant differences in vulnerability, and poorer farmers had higher vulnerability to livelihood. However, because poorer farmers had more diverse and flexible livelihood strategies, Therefore, from the practice of local farmers, the high vulnerability of livelihoods does not necessarily lead to low resilience. The relationship between the two should be combined with the specific practice of the local analysis.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F323.6

【参考文献】