辽宁省农村集体经营性建设用地现状调查及入市建议研究

发布时间：2018-05-23 19:43

本文选题：农地入市 + 农村集体经营性建设用地　；参考：《沈阳农业大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：在第十二届全国人大常委会第十三次会议上,国务院关于提请审议《关于授权国务院在北京市大兴区等33个试点县(市、区)行政区域暂时调整实施有关法律规定的决定(草案)》的议案的通过,明确了辽宁省海城市等33个县做为农村集体经营性建设用地直接入市的试点,而为了推进集体经营性建设用地入市,摸清辽宁省集体经营性建设用地的存量现状及利用现状就极为重要。本文基于实地调研的125个样本村分析辽宁省集体经营性建设用地的现状,并通过交叉分析的方法分析不同区域、经济发展水平、规模等村的农村集体经营性建设用地存量现状和利用现状,同时分析目前辽宁省农村集体经营性建设用地入市存在的问题,最后在借鉴相关经验的基础上提出对策建议。研究发现：在本次调研的125个样本中,有农村集体经营性建设用地的村庄为29个,占比为23.2%,没有农村集体经营性建设用地的村庄为96个,占76.8%,共拥有55宗集体经营性建设用地,被利用宗数17宗,未被利用38宗。利用率仅为30.90%,超过7成的农村集体经营性建设用地宗数目前处于闲置状态。125个样本村中,共拥有672亩集体经营性建设用地,被利用面积为70亩,未被利用面积602亩,利用率仅为10.42%,接近90%的农村集体经营性建设用地面积正处于闲置状态,未被有效利用。经济发展水平较高县域组的平均农村集体经营性建设用地存量面积均值达到了60.43亩,远远超过经济发展水平较低县域组的31.14亩的平均水平。从区域间的对比可以发现,辽东地区的样本村中有农村集体经营性建设用地村庄占比最高,达到了34.62%,辽南略低于辽东地区,达到了33.33%,最低的是辽中地区,仅为3.70%。经济发展水平较高的县域样本中的农村集体经营性建设用地被利用情况不如经济发展水平较低县域的农村集体经营性建设用地利用情况。目前农村经营性建设用地存在诸多问题：与村庄民宅混杂、分布过于零散；农村的经营性建设用地与非经营性建设用地的边界确定不明确；农村经营性建设用地被大量占用且利用率低、收回极具难度；缩小征地范围后的新增建设用地如何界定、以何种方式进入市场配置产生质疑；集体经营性建设用地入市市场不规范,隐形市场仍然广泛存在；收益分配方式标准不一,各方存在较大分歧等。针对上述问题,本文提出了稳步推进农村不动产登记、明晰产权,加强市场监管、规范经营性建设用地入市流转程序,健全农村集体经营性建设用地入市收益分配机制,建立集体与农民参与收益分配的合理方式,建立整体制度框架,将三项改革同步推进等建议。
[Abstract]:At the 13th meeting of the Twelfth National people's Congress standing Committee, the State Council submitted for deliberation 33 pilot counties (cities) including the State Council in Daxing District of Beijing, The passage of the motion on the temporary readjustment and implementation of the decision (draft) > of the relevant legal provisions in the administrative area has made it clear that 33 counties, including Haicheng City in Liaoning Province, will be the pilot units for direct entry of rural collective operating construction land into the market. In order to promote the collective management construction land into the market, it is very important to find out the stock and utilization status of the collective management construction land in Liaoning Province. Based on 125 sample villages of field investigation, this paper analyzes the present situation of construction land for collective management in Liaoning Province, and analyzes the level of economic development in different regions by means of cross-analysis. At the same time, the paper analyzes the existing problems of rural collective operating construction land in Liaoning Province, and finally puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions on the basis of the relevant experience. The study found that among the 125 samples of this study, 29 villages had rural collective operating construction land, accounting for 23.2percent, and 96 villages without rural collective management construction land accounted for 76.8B, with 55 collective operating construction sites. The number of cases used was 17 and the number of cases not utilized was 38. The utilization ratio is only 30.90, and the number of rural collective operating construction land in more than 70% is currently idle. In 125 sample villages, there are 672 mu of collective operating construction land, with a utilized area of 70 mu and an unused area of 602 mu. The utilization rate is only 10.42, and nearly 90% of the rural collective operating land area is idle, which has not been effectively utilized. The average land area of rural collective management construction land reached 60.43 mu in the higher level of economic development, far higher than the average level of 31.14 mu in the lower level of economic development. From the comparison between regions, it can be found that in the sample villages in eastern Liaoning province, the proportion of rural collective operating construction land is the highest, reaching 34.62, slightly lower in southern Liaoning than in eastern Liaoning, and 33.33 in south Liaoning, and the lowest in central Liaoning, only 3.70. The use of rural collective management construction land in the sample of county areas with higher economic development level is lower than that in counties with lower economic development level. At present, there are many problems in rural commercial construction land: mixed with village houses and scattered in distribution, the boundary between operating construction land and non-operational construction land in rural areas is not clear; The rural operating construction land is occupied by a large amount and the utilization rate is low, so it is very difficult to recover the new construction land after narrowing the scope of land requisition, how to define the new construction land after narrowing the land requisition, and how to enter the market configuration in what way has been questioned; The market of collective management construction land is not standardized, the invisible market still exists widely, the standard of income distribution is different, the parties are different and so on. In order to solve the above problems, this paper puts forward to steadily advance the registration of rural real estate, clarify property rights, strengthen market supervision, standardize the procedure of circulation of commercial construction land, and perfect the mechanism of income distribution of rural collective construction land. Some suggestions such as establishing a reasonable way for collective and farmers to participate in the distribution of income, setting up an overall institutional framework, and pushing forward the three reforms simultaneously.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：F321.1

【相似文献】