我国典型的区域发展模式及其经济收敛分析——基于2000-2012年我国七个典型区域面板数据的实证分析

发布时间：2018-05-23 20:44

本文选题：区域发展模式 + 比较优势　；参考：《经济问题探索》2015年03期

【摘要】：改革开放后,我国各地区努力探索适合本地经济发展的路径,由此各自形成了比较典型区域发展模式。本文以广东、江苏、浙江、山东、广西、四川、内蒙古七个典型的区域作为研究对象,比较各区域的发展模式。研究结果显示,各区域在改革开放之初形成的产业比较优势一直延续到了当前。通过收敛分析发现七个区域间存在σ收敛和条件β收敛。在条件β收敛模型中人力资本、物质资本、港澳台外资企业、私营企业、特色农业部门对以上七个区域的经济收敛具有促进作用;而对外贸易、国有企业、乡镇企业、农村劳动力转移等因素进一步拉大上述区域间的差距。笔者把比较优势指标引入条件收敛后发现,假如以上区域墨守成规,依旧依靠传统的比较优势,会抑制区域间的经济收敛进度。
[Abstract]:After the reform and opening up, every region of our country tries hard to explore the path suitable for the development of local economy, thus forming a more typical regional development mode. In this paper, seven typical regions of Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, Guangxi, Sichuan and Inner Mongolia are taken as research objects, and the development models of each region are compared. The results show that the industrial comparative advantage formed at the beginning of reform and opening up has been extended to the present. By convergence analysis, it is found that there exists 蟽 convergence and conditional 尾 convergence among seven regions. In the conditional 尾 convergence model, human capital, material capital, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan foreign-funded enterprises, private enterprises and the characteristic agricultural sector can promote the economic convergence of the above seven regions, while foreign trade, state-owned enterprises, township enterprises, Rural labor transfer and other factors further widen the gap between the above regions. After introducing the index of comparative advantage into conditional convergence, it is found that if the above regions follow the rules and still rely on the traditional comparative advantage, the progress of economic convergence between regions will be restrained.
【作者单位】：中国农业大学;
【分类号】：F127

【参考文献】