区域行政协议研究
发布时间:2018-06-23 06:45
本文选题:区域经济一体化 + 行政协议 ; 参考:《南京大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:行政协议作为一种新型的行政行为,是区域经济一体化的产物,在解决跨区域,跨行业的行政事务方面发挥着重要的作用与价值。但是由于行政协议应用历史较短,所以在很长的一段时间内被国内学者所忽视,所以当大量的行政协议在实践中出现时,没有形成健全完善的理论体系,部分方面还存在理论盲点。这种盲点不仅仅体现在理论方面,同时在制度上也存在缺位现象。正是因为存在制度上与理论上的缺陷,当前我国法律在此方面也存在较大的漏洞。理论与制度上存在着较大问题,导致行政协议制度化的难度大大增加。之所以进行本文的研究,就是为了构建成熟完善的行政协议制度。本文在研究时坚持理论与实际相结合,综合分析了现阶段中国长三角地区行政协议制度的运行情况。同时,将这一发展现状与美国以及西班牙相关制度进行对比研究,进而对中国行政协议制度的发展提出更多具有建设性的指导意见。本文大致分为五个部分: 在绪论部分,笔者主要介绍本文的选题缘由,研究的理论基础,研究的意义与价值,使用的研究方法、本文的主体框架、特色以及不足。 紧接着,就是行政协议的基本理论部分。重点对行政协议的定义进行界定,本文在界定行政协议的定义时,运用了相近概念对比分析的方法,主要辨析了行政协议与公法契约、行政协议与行政契约、行政协议与行政合同的概念异同,最终对行政协议的概念做出了界定:本文所述之行政协议主要指行政协的是两个行政主体之间,为实现某种公务或者行政目的,经协商一致而签订的有关双方权利义务关系的协议。在这一部分笔者还阐述了行政协议的特点:制度性、协调性、自愿性和区域性。行政协议之所以会出现,是由我国的基本国情决定的,我国是单一制国家,地方政府隶属于中央政府管辖,然而,我国是一个幅员辽阔的且地区发展极不平衡的国家,中央政府无法控制地方政府一切,放权是不可避免的。事实上,为了促进地方政府的积极性和主动性,中央政府已经下放了行政权力,在这样的现实条件下,地方政府相对独立并且掌握了大量的实权。因此,地方政府与地方政府之间,可以根据自己掌握的实权进行利益交换与合作,行政协议自然应运而生。 现实中大量行政协议的出现,还有一个重要原因——区域经济一体化。随着区域一体化进程的不断推进,地方政府势必会参与到这一进程,如果地方政府不能够适时的调整管理方法与方式,一定会导致新的区域公共问题层出不穷。因此,以何种方式应对区域一体化成为地方政府面临的重要问题。现实实践中,地方政府往往将区域行政协议作为他们的首选。 但是现实实践中大量区域行政协议的出现,也导致了大量问题的出现,实践中区域行政协议存在合法性危机、缔结主体的范围和资格、必备条款严重缺失、效力不确定、缺少履行性规则的约束、没有有效的纠纷解决机制等问题。 为了解决上述问题,笔者试着就完善我国区域行政协议制度,提出了若干对策建议。但是由于我国行政协议出现的历史较短,学界对其研究也不是特别完善,因此笔者首先通过分析美国和西班牙的行政协议制度,以供我国参考借鉴。接着针对我国区域行政协议制度实践中存在的亟待解决的问题,提出了几点针对性的对策和建议。
[Abstract]:As a new administrative act, administrative agreement is the product of regional economic integration. It plays an important role and value in solving cross regional and cross industry administrative affairs. However, because of the short history of the application of administrative agreement, it is ignored by scholars in the country for a long time, so when a large number of administrative agreements are in In practice, there is no sound and perfect theoretical system, and there are some theoretical blind spots. This blind spot is not only embodied in the theory, but also in the system. It is because of the defects in the system and theory that there are also large loopholes in the current law in this respect. There is a big problem, which leads to the difficulty of the institutionalization of administrative agreement. The reason why this article is studied is to build a mature and perfect administrative agreement system. This paper combines theory with practice in the study and analyzes the operation of the administrative agreement system in the Yangtze River Delta region at the present stage. The development status and the United States and Spain related systems are compared, and then put forward more constructive guidance to the development of China's administrative agreement system. This paper is divided into five parts:
In the introduction part, the author mainly introduces the origin of the topic, the theoretical basis of the study, the significance and value of the study, the research method used, the main frame, the characteristics and the shortcomings of this article.
Then, it is the basic theory part of the administrative agreement. The definition of administrative agreement is defined. In defining the definition of the administrative agreement, this paper uses the method of comparison and analysis of similar concepts. It mainly distinguishes the agreement between administrative agreement and public law, the agreement of administrative agreement and the agreement of administrative agreement, the similarities and differences between administrative agreement and administrative contract, and finally to the concept of administrative agreement and administrative contract. The concept of administrative agreement is defined. The administrative agreement described in this article mainly refers to the agreement between the two administrative bodies of the Political Consultative Conference and the agreement on the rights and obligations of the two parties signed by negotiation for the realization of a certain official or administrative purpose. In this part, the author also expounds the characteristics of the administrative agreement: institutional, coordination, and the characteristics of the administrative agreement. Voluntary and regional. The emergence of the administrative agreement is determined by the basic national conditions of our country. Our country is a single country and the local government is under the jurisdiction of the central government. However, our country is a country with a vast territory and extremely unbalanced regional development. The central government can not control all the local governments, and the decentralization is inevitable. In fact, in order to promote the initiative and initiative of the local government, the central government has laid down the administrative power. Under such realistic conditions, the local government is relatively independent and has a great deal of real power. Therefore, the local government and the local government can exchange and cooperate with the local government according to their own real power. However, it came into being.
In reality, the emergence of a large number of administrative agreements, there is an important reason - regional economic integration. With the continuous progress of regional integration, local governments will inevitably participate in this process. If local governments can not adjust the management methods and methods in a timely manner, the new regional public problems will emerge in endlessly. The way to cope with regional integration has become an important issue for local governments. In practice, local governments often take regional administrative agreements as their first choice.
However, the emergence of a large number of regional administrative agreements in practical practice also leads to the emergence of a large number of problems. In practice, the regional administrative agreements have the crisis of legitimacy, the scope and qualification of the main body, the lack of necessary provisions, the uncertainty of effectiveness, the lack of constraints of the performance rules, and the lack of effective dispute settlement mechanism.
In order to solve the above problems, the author tries to put forward some countermeasures and suggestions on improving the system of regional administrative agreement in China. However, because of the short history of the administrative agreement in our country, the academic circles are not particularly perfect for its research, so the author first analyzes the administrative agreement system of the United States and Spain to provide reference for our country. In view of the problems that need to be solved in the practice of regional administrative agreement system in China, several pertinent countermeasures and suggestions are put forward.
【学位授予单位】:南京大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谢庆奎;中国政府的府际关系研究[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年01期
2 何渊;;环渤海地区行政协议的法学思考[J];北京交通大学学报(社会科学版);2008年04期
3 关保英;;论内部行政合同[J];比较法研究;2007年06期
4 余凌云;论行政契约的含义——一种比较法上的认识[J];比较法研究;1997年03期
5 李金龙;王宝元;;地方政府管理体制:区域经济一体化发展的重要制度瓶颈[J];财经理论与实践;2007年01期
6 何渊;;试论美国宪法中的“协定条款”及对我国的启示[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
7 许多奇;论我国区域经济一体化中的区域调节[J];法学;2005年11期
8 何渊;;泛珠三角地区行政协议的评估及建议[J];广东行政学院学报;2006年02期
9 张紧跟;当代美国地方政府间关系协调的实践及其启示[J];公共管理学报;2005年01期
10 陈瑞莲,张紧跟;试论我国区域行政研究[J];广州大学学报(社会科学版);2002年04期
,本文编号:2056245
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/quyujingjilunwen/2056245.html