基于DEA-Malmquist指数法的省域全要素生产率比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-23 09:43

本文选题：全要素生产率　切入点：Malmquist指数　出处：《干旱区地理》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：基于DEA的Malmquist指数方法,选取2000-2012年的面板数据,在把劳动力受教育因素定量纳入TFP影响因素的基础上,测算31个省区市和全国平均全要素生产率及其构成。根据测算结果,对31个省区市进行聚类分析,并对全国和东、中、西部的全要素生产率增长进行收敛分析。结果显示:2001-2012年全国全要素生产率的增长率为负值,技术进步对全要素生产率的贡献总体好于技术效率,技术效率是制约全要素生产率提升的主要原因;全国区域全要素生产率变化情况在空间上呈现U形分布的特征,东、西部全要素生产率增长较好,中部有明显的凹陷现象,西部省份间的分化严重;全国和东、中、西部不存在全要素生产率增长的区域性绝对收敛,但存在条件收敛,表明东中西全要素生产率增长有明显差距并不会随时间缩小,但会趋于稳定,省域经济发展的非均衡现象将长期存在。以上研究结果的政策含义是:提升省域技术效率对全要素生产率更为有效,应重点改善中部低质增长区域,东中西应实施差异化发展政策。
[Abstract]:Based on the Malmquist index method of DEA, the panel data from 2000 to 2012 are selected to measure the average total factor productivity (TFP) and its composition of 31 provinces, autonomous regions and cities and the whole country on the basis of incorporating the factors of labor education into the influencing factors of TFP. The cluster analysis of 31 provinces, districts and cities is carried out, and the convergence analysis of the total factor productivity growth in the east, middle and west of the country is carried out. The results show that the growth rate of the total factor productivity in the whole country from 2001 to 2012 is negative. The contribution of technological progress to total factor productivity is generally better than that of technical efficiency, and technical efficiency is the main reason for restricting the increase of total factor productivity. The total factor productivity growth in the west is better, the central part has obvious depression, and the division between the western provinces is serious. There is no regional absolute convergence of the total factor productivity growth in the whole country, in the east and in the middle and in the west, but there is conditional convergence. It shows that the gap between East, West and West in total factor productivity growth will not shrink over time, but will tend to be stable. The policy implication of the above research results is that improving the technical efficiency of the province is more effective to the total factor productivity, and should focus on improving the low quality growth region in the central region. East and west should carry out differentiation development policy.
【作者单位】：新疆大学经济与管理学院;新疆维吾尔自治区科技厅;新疆大学新疆创新管理研究中心;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金“资源型产业碳排放损益偏离分析及区域公平发展研究”(NO.71463056) 新疆维吾尔自治区科技支撑计划项目“科技创新引领丝绸之路经济带发展战略研究”(201442101)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F124

【相似文献】