社交-成瘾性消费的偏好迁移、收入效应及隐性成本

发布时间：2018-03-29 10:51

  本文选题：成瘾性消费　切入点：群体依赖性　出处：《经济学动态》2017年07期

【摘要】：烟酒消费兼具个体成瘾和群体交际的双重特性,在我国居民社会经济活动中扮演着特殊的角色。本文构建了交互效应非线性面板SVAR系统,测度以烟酒消费为代表的社交-成瘾性消费的偏好变迁、显性收入效应和隐性社会成本。结果显示,烟的消费主要表现为个体成瘾行为,交际性消费的比例约为6%,不同收入水平下没有明显变化;而酒的消费则主要表现为群体成瘾行为,其交际性消费的比例在低收入状态下约为30%、高收入下则高达60%。烟酒消费均具有正向的显性收入效应,但扣除隐性经济损失后,烟草消费的纯经济效应近似为0,而酒则显著为负。显性的收入效应对烟酒消费形成了自激励增长趋势,且价格调控无效,所以社交—成瘾性消费行为要依赖于制度和社会认知等因素的外生制约。
[Abstract]:The consumption of tobacco and alcohol has the dual characteristics of individual addiction and group communication, and plays a special role in the social and economic activities of Chinese residents. In this paper, a nonlinear panel SVAR system with interactive effects is constructed. The results show that the consumption of tobacco and alcohol is mainly characterized by individual addiction behavior. The changes of preference, dominant income effect and hidden social cost of consumption of tobacco and alcohol are measured, and the results show that the consumption of tobacco is mainly characterized by individual addictive behavior. The proportion of communicative consumption is about 6, and there is no significant change in different income levels, while the consumption of alcohol is mainly manifested as group addiction behavior. The proportion of communicative consumption in low income is about 30%, and in high income is as high as 60%. The consumption of tobacco and alcohol has positive and dominant income effect, but after deducting the hidden economic loss, The pure economic effect of tobacco consumption is approximately zero, while that of alcohol is significantly negative. Therefore, social-addictive consumer behavior depends on the exogenous constraints of institutions and social cognition.
【作者单位】： 华中科技大学经济学院;
【基金】：全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目“交互(分组)效应面板数据模型理论与应用研究”(201304) 国家自然科学基金面上项目“平衡/非平衡交互效应面板SVAR模型的估计量与应用研究”(71271096)资助
【分类号】：F126.1
，

本文编号：1680818