中俄制度创新的经济绩效比较研究
本文选题:制度创新 + 中俄 ; 参考:《吉林大学》2014年博士论文
【摘要】:制度创新与国家的经济发展存在着密切的联系,有效率的制度可以激发人们的创造性和积极性,促进社会资源的合理配置和社会财富的持续增长,并最终推动整个社会的进步。 中国自1949年成立至今,对制度的探索与创新就从没有停止过,尤其是改革开放的三十多年里,中国通过在制度上的创新所取得的经济飞跃更是世界瞩目。对于中国在经济上取得的成就,诸多学者持有不同的看法,但毫无疑问的,体制改革中对于制度的不断创新促进了中国的经济增长。可是中国经济的增长速度正在逐年减缓,如何能突破经济发展瓶颈,并保持经济的稳定快速增长,成为了现阶段中国经济改革的关键,而制度上的创新将成为突破这一瓶颈的重要动力。 俄罗斯与中国既是相邻的大国,又几乎是在同一时期进行了由计划经济制度向市场经济制度的转变,中国的经济制度改革是“渐进式”的,而俄罗斯的经济制度改革是“激进式”的,虽然中俄两国的经济改革模式不尽相同,但最终的制度创新目标均是要建立市场经济体制。在向市场经济制度的转型过程中,两国均实现了适应本国国情的、具有本国特色的经济制度上的不断创新,使得中俄的经济制度转型与西方国家不尽相同,中俄两国之间也存在较多差异。许多经济评论者认为,中国的经济制度转型相较俄罗斯而言是成功的,因为这一过程使中国的经济飞速增长,但现在下结论还言之过早。俄罗斯在改革之初确实出现了经济倒退的经济现象,但这种置之死地而后生的作法最终也使得俄罗斯的经济起死回生。俄罗斯在“激进式”的制度创新模式下,彻底的推翻了原有经济制度,重新建立系统完整的经济制度,为俄罗斯的经济可持续发展奠定了坚实的基础。对比俄罗斯在经济制度创新中与中国存在的差异,分析该差异对经济增长的影响,将成为中国下一步的经济制度创新的重要借鉴。 本文运用动态定性和静态定量以及实证检验的分析方法,通过对中俄两国经济绩效的归纳总结和比较,全面深入系统的分析了中俄两国自20世纪50年代以来的经济制度创新历程、存在的共性和差异,为中国经济制度改革的进一步深化提供参考。 本文主要包括以下几个部分: 第一章为导论。主要阐述全文的写作背景及选题意义,梳理和总结国内外关于中国和俄罗斯的经济制度创新的相关文献和研究成果,提出写作思路与框架,确定本文的研究方法。 第二章是全文进行比较研究的理论基础。该部分在准确界定制度创新的含义的基础上,主要概述了在创新经济学、新制度经济学、制度与经济增长理论中与制度创新研究相关的理论。这些理论对研究中俄经济制度创新是至关重要的。 第三章和第四章分别对中国和俄罗斯的经济制度创新历程和内容及绩效进行了归纳和总结,并利用实证检验的方法对中俄的经济制度创新进行分析。第三章是对俄罗斯的经济制度创新历程进行了梳理,并将此历程分为了三个阶段去阐述。其中包括对前苏联时期、“休克疗法”时期、普京时期的经济制度创新的总结和分析。并通过对这一时期的经济绩效的系统分析和实证分析,对普京时期的经济制度创新给予了肯定的评价。第四章是对中国的经济制度创新内容进行了归纳总结,将中国的经济制度创新历程分为了两个阶段,即1949年-1979年的计划经济时期和1979年至今的市场经济时期。对计划经济时期的经济制度创新进行了总体的归纳和总结并结合该时期的经济绩效对经济制度创新进行评价。对市场经济时期的分析是将该时期进行的不同领域的有代表性的创新经济制度进行分类归纳总结的,对这段时期中国的经济制度创新进行了系统的梳理,并运用实证检验的方式分析了中国经济制度创新对经济增长产生的影响,,为中俄经济制度创新的比较研究提供了事实依据。 第五章为全文的核心内容,是对中国和俄罗斯的经济制度创新的比较分析。该部分解析了中俄制度创新比较分析的价值,强调了对中俄两国进行经济制度创新比较的重要性。从多角度对中俄的经济制度创新进行比较研究,其中包括对中俄经济制度创新模式的比较、对中俄私有化制度创新和分税制创新的比较、对中俄在经济制度创新中取得的经济绩效的比较。 第六章在可持续发展视域下对中俄经济制度创新存在的共性与差异及存在的问题进行分析总结。 第七章是对全文的总结和对未来的展望。
[Abstract]:There is a close relationship between institutional innovation and the economic development of the country. An efficient system can stimulate people's creativity and enthusiasm, promote the rational allocation of social resources and the sustained growth of social wealth, and ultimately promote the progress of the whole society.
Since the founding of China in 1949, the exploration and innovation of the system has never stopped, especially in the more than 30 years of reform and opening up, China has made more and more attention in the world through the innovation of the system. Many scholars hold different views on the achievements of China in the economy, but there is no doubt that the system reform is unquestionable. The continuous innovation of the system has promoted the economic growth of China. However, the growth rate of China's economy is slowing down year by year. How to break through the bottleneck of economic development and maintain the stable and rapid economic growth has become the key to the reform of China's economy at the present stage, and the innovation of the system will become an important driving force for breaking this bottleneck.
Russia and China are not only neighboring countries, but also the transformation from planned economy to market economy in the same period. The reform of China's economic system is "progressive", and the reform of Russia's economic system is "radical". Although the economic reform mode of the two countries of China and Russia is different, the final system is not the same. In the process of transforming to the market economy system, both countries have realized the continuous innovation in the economic system with its own national characteristics, making the economic system transformation between China and Russia different from that of the western countries, and there are many differences between China and Russia. Critics argue that the transformation of China's economic system is more successful than Russia's, because this process has made China's economy growing fast, but it is too early to conclude. Russia has indeed appeared economic recession at the beginning of the reform, but the dead and afterbirth practices eventually made the Russian economy. In the "radical" system innovation model, Russia thoroughly overthrew the original economic system and established a complete system of economic system, laid a solid foundation for the sustainable development of Russia's economy. The impact will become an important reference for China's next economic system innovation.
By using the dynamic qualitative and static quantitative and empirical analysis methods, this paper makes a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the economic system innovation process of China and Russia since 1950s, and makes a thorough and systematic analysis of the economic system innovation process of China and Russia, which has made a thorough and systematic analysis of the economic system innovation in China and Russia since 1950s. For reference.
This article mainly includes the following parts:
The first chapter is the introduction. It mainly expounds the writing background and the significance of the topic, combs and summarizes the relevant literature and research achievements on the economic system innovation of China and Russia, puts forward the thinking and framework of writing, and determines the research methods of this article.
The second chapter is the theoretical basis for the comparative study of the full text. On the basis of defining the meaning of the system innovation, this part mainly outlines the theories related to the research of institutional innovation in the innovation economics, the new institutional economics, the system and the economic growth theory. These theories are very important to the research of the economic system innovation in China and Russia.
The third chapter and the fourth chapter respectively summarize and summarize the economic system innovation process, content and performance of China and Russia, and analyze the economic system innovation of China and Russia by the method of empirical test. The third chapter is to sort out the process of Russian economic system innovation and divide the course into three stages. It includes the summary and analysis of the economic system innovation during the period of shock therapy in the former Soviet Union, the period of shock therapy and the Putin period. Through the systematic and empirical analysis of the economic performance in this period, the economic system innovation in the period of Putin was affirmed. The fourth chapter was the innovation of the economic system in China. The process of economic system innovation in China is divided into two stages, namely, the planned economic period of -1979 in 1949 and the period of market economy from 1979 to the present. The economic system innovation in the period of planned economy is summarized and summarized, and the economic system innovation is evaluated in combination with the economic performance in this period. The analysis of the period of the market economy is the classification and summary of the representative innovative economic system in different areas of the period. It systematically combs the innovation of China's economic system in this period, and analyzes the influence of China's economic system innovation on economic growth by the way of empirical test, which is China Russia. A comparative study of economic institutional innovation provides a factual basis.
The fifth chapter is the core content of the full text, which is the comparative analysis of the economic system innovation between China and Russia. This part analyses the value of the comparative analysis of China Russia system innovation and emphasizes the importance of the comparison of the economic system innovation between China and Russia. The comparison of the innovation mode of Russian economic system, the comparison of the innovation of the privatization system between China and Russia and the innovation of the tax sharing system, compares the economic performance of China and Russia in the innovation of the economic system.
The sixth chapter analyzes and summarizes the similarities and differences of the economic system innovation between China and Russia from the perspective of sustainable development.
The seventh chapter is the summary of the full text and the outlook for the future.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F120;F151.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蓝虹;产权制度创新、技术创新与可持续发展[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期
2 李波;新剑桥学派的经济增长模型[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2001年01期
3 金玉国;宏观制度变迁对转型时期中国经济增长的贡献[J];财经科学;2001年02期
4 刘国光;促进消费需求提高消费率是扩大内需的必由之路[J];财贸经济;2002年05期
5 袁芳;;锦标赛、内生性制度创新供给与地区博弈——以各地物流园区布局为例[J];财贸研究;2006年04期
6 傅志华;俄罗斯个人所得税制改革考察[J];财政研究;2003年04期
7 唐朱昌;俄罗斯国有企业产权制度变迁的绩效分析[J];俄罗斯中亚东欧研究;2003年05期
8 王佳慧;;俄罗斯税权划分法律制度评介——兼谈对我国分税制改革的启示[J];俄罗斯中亚东欧研究;2009年04期
9 魏建国;;俄罗斯市场经济转型困境的法治视角解读[J];俄罗斯中亚东欧研究;2011年06期
10 刘婷婷;张慧君;;转型深化进程中的国家治理模式重构[J];俄罗斯研究;2008年03期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 谢琦;中国经济增长模式转型的结构分析[D];西北大学;2009年
2 林勇;转型经济可持续发展论[D];重庆大学;2009年
3 任常军;金融危机背景下我国税制改革研究[D];华中科技大学;2009年
本文编号:1780538
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/1780538.html