用基尼系数衡量我国收入公平的局限性研究
发布时间：2018-09-19 08:05
【摘要】：收入公平并不等同于收入平等。较收入平等而言,收入公平并不能通过客观评判标准加以衡量,它受个体主观偏好的影响,更侧重于个体的主观价值判断,而不能简单地通过客观理性数据加以度量。 目前我国存在较大的收入差距,且基尼系数一度突破0.4的警戒线。我国收入差距的存在具有一定特殊性,其原因来自经济、政治、思想文化三方面。但是,在较大收入差距存在的情况下,社会发展的稳定因素总体上大于不稳定因素,整个社会的发展总体上也呈现出和谐有序的景象。这与基尼系数超过0.4警戒线的预期表现有所不同。 基尼系数不仅在自身方面存在局限,还在衡量收入公平方面以及在衡量我国收入差距特殊性方面均存在一定程度上的局限,从而导致基尼系数在衡量我国收入公平问题时存在局限。基于此,首先在对基尼系数就自身方面存在的局限进行数据及计算方法弥补的基础上,再针对收入公平的判断具有主观性的特点,从分析居民对收入公平进行主观判断的影响因素入手,结合居民收入差距接受度的各方影响因素和科学的理性统计数据两方面,找到一种既立足于统计数据又融入居民对收入差距主观感知的更为符合现实的评判方式。
[Abstract]:Income equity is not equal to income equality. Compared with income equality, income equity can not be measured by objective criteria. It is influenced by individual subjective preference and focuses more on individual subjective value judgment, and can not be simply measured by objective rational data. At present, there is a large income gap in China, and the Gini coefficient once exceeded the warning line of 0.4. The existence of income gap in China has its particularity, which comes from three aspects: economy, politics, ideology and culture. However, under the condition of large income gap, the stable factors of social development are generally larger than the unstable factors, and the overall development of the whole society also presents a harmonious and orderly scene. This is different from the expected performance of the Gini coefficient above the warning line of 0.4. The Gini coefficient is not only limited in its own aspects, but also in the measurement of income equity, as well as in the measurement of the particularity of the income gap in China. As a result, the Gini coefficient is limited in measuring income equity in China. Based on this, first of all, on the basis of making up for the limitations of Gini coefficient in its own aspects, and then aiming at the subjective characteristics of the judgment of income equity, Starting with the analysis of the influencing factors of residents' subjective judgment on income equity, combining the factors affecting the acceptance of the income gap of residents and the scientific and rational statistical data, To find a more realistic judgment method based on statistical data and integrating residents' subjective perception of income gap.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F124.7
本文编号：2249530
[Abstract]:Income equity is not equal to income equality. Compared with income equality, income equity can not be measured by objective criteria. It is influenced by individual subjective preference and focuses more on individual subjective value judgment, and can not be simply measured by objective rational data. At present, there is a large income gap in China, and the Gini coefficient once exceeded the warning line of 0.4. The existence of income gap in China has its particularity, which comes from three aspects: economy, politics, ideology and culture. However, under the condition of large income gap, the stable factors of social development are generally larger than the unstable factors, and the overall development of the whole society also presents a harmonious and orderly scene. This is different from the expected performance of the Gini coefficient above the warning line of 0.4. The Gini coefficient is not only limited in its own aspects, but also in the measurement of income equity, as well as in the measurement of the particularity of the income gap in China. As a result, the Gini coefficient is limited in measuring income equity in China. Based on this, first of all, on the basis of making up for the limitations of Gini coefficient in its own aspects, and then aiming at the subjective characteristics of the judgment of income equity, Starting with the analysis of the influencing factors of residents' subjective judgment on income equity, combining the factors affecting the acceptance of the income gap of residents and the scientific and rational statistical data, To find a more realistic judgment method based on statistical data and integrating residents' subjective perception of income gap.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F124.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 袁强,周艳;收入分配及其在社会主义市场经济条件下的实现[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);1997年06期
2 张兴云;谈“基尼系数”在我国的应用问题[J];本溪冶金高等专科学校学报;2004年04期
3 黄泰岩;我国个人收入差距的变动特征及其调节政策[J];当代经济研究;2001年04期
4 任红艳;;对基尼系数的批判性分析[J];贵州社会科学;2006年02期
5 刘艳萍;;用基尼系数衡量我国收入公平的局限性探讨[J];改革与战略;2014年02期
6 童星;社会分配公平与否的判定[J];江苏社会科学;1995年01期
7 丁宁宁,葛延风;“十五”时期缓解收入分配矛盾的政策思路[J];江苏社会科学;2001年03期
8 "促进形成合理的居民收入分配机制研究"课题组;常兴华;徐振斌;李伟;;我国居民收入差距及其来源分解[J];经济研究参考;2010年25期
9 高国顺;试析适度的收入差距[J];理论月刊;2001年04期
10 洪兴建,李金昌;如何正确测算我国居民收入基尼系数[J];南开经济研究;2005年04期
，本文编号：2249530
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2249530.html
