我国票据法中合法持票人法律问题研究
发布时间:2018-06-05 23:58
本文选题:合法持票人 + 对价 ; 参考:《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国《票据法》中并没有划分持票人的类型,只是笼统地称为“持票人”,但细究条文,不同条文中持票人的内涵和权利并不相同。本文主要论述合法持票人,即取得票据的方式不违反法律规定,享有票据权利且其权利能享受到法律最为完整保护的持票人,相较于其他类型持票人,,其所受的票据抗辩被法律严格限制。 本文运用比较分析法、辅以实证分析法和法解释学方法对合法持票人及其法律实用问题进行了全面的梳理和深入的论证,并在第三章和第四章对我国现行立法条文进行了深入的分析,提出了相应的建议。 本文除引言外,还有正文和结语两个部分。 引言主要介绍了本文的写作背景、研究意义、研究方法和创新之处。 正文分为五个部分: 第一章分析了合法持票人的概念界定问题。本部分首先对我国法中持票人类型进行大致划分,在对域外立法和我国司法实务进行考察梳理的基础上,总结出了我国法中合法持票人的构成要件,此外也论述了合法持票人与其他类型持票人的区别。 第二章分析了票据对价问题。首先,在阐述合同对价的起源和概念特征的基础上,论述了票据对价与之不同之处;其次,通过对票据对价与票据无因性,票据对价与票据效力和取得票据权利进行对比,并讨论支付部分对价的法律效果等内容论述了支付对价的法律效果;最后,阐述了对我国《票据法》第10条第2款的理解问题。 第三章分析了善意问题。首先,从善意的认定标准出发,分别论述了“恶意”和“重大过失”的概念和内涵,并对二者的具体表现形式进行了探讨;其次,对我国《票据法》第12条第2款进行了理论分析、法条分析和实证分析,提出其不合理之处;最后,探讨了票据的善意取得问题,并对无处分权人的类型进行了细分。 第四章论述了票据形式合法问题。提出并论述了票据形式合法问题包括票据的记载内容要符合法律规定,票据的记载方法要符合法律规定和票据记载的载体要符合法律规定。 第五章论述了合法持票人的权利保护问题。主要论述了票据丧失救济和票据侵权救济。在票据丧失救济中论述了票据相对丧失和绝对丧失时的权利保护问题,在票据侵权救济总论述了伪造出票和伪造背书场合的救济问题。
[Abstract]:In our country's negotiable instrument Law, there is no division of the type of bearer, but it is generally called "holder of ticket", but the meaning and rights of holder in different articles are not the same. This paper mainly discusses the legal bearer, that is, the holder who has the right to the bill and whose right can enjoy the most complete protection of the law, compared with other types of bearer, which does not violate the provisions of the law and has the right to obtain the bill in a manner that is not in violation of the provisions of the law. The bill defense to which it is subjected is strictly restricted by law. This paper, by means of comparative analysis, empirical analysis and legal hermeneutics, comprehensively combs the legal holders and their legal practical problems. In the third and fourth chapters, the current legislative provisions of our country are deeply analyzed, and corresponding suggestions are put forward. In addition to the introduction, there are two parts of the text and conclusion. The introduction mainly introduces the writing background, research significance, research methods and innovations of this paper. The text is divided into five parts: The first chapter analyzes the definition of legal bearer. This part firstly roughly divides the types of holders of ticket holders in our country's law. On the basis of investigating and combing the extraterritorial legislation and the judicial practice of our country, it summarizes the constitutive requirements of legal holders of ticket holders in Chinese law. In addition, the difference between legal bearer and other types of bearer is also discussed. The second chapter analyzes the consideration of bills. First of all, on the basis of explaining the origin and conceptual characteristics of contract consideration, the paper discusses the difference between bill consideration and bill consideration; secondly, through the comparison between bill consideration and bill non-causality, the validity of bill consideration and bill and the acquisition of bill right, The legal effect of payment consideration is discussed, and finally, the understanding of the second paragraph of Article 10 of our country's negotiable instrument Law is expounded. The third chapter analyzes the problem of goodwill. First of all, the paper discusses the concept and connotation of "malice" and "gross negligence", and discusses their concrete forms of expression. The second paragraph of Article 12 of the Bill Law of our country is analyzed in theory, article 12 and empirical analysis, and the irrationality is put forward. Finally, the problem of bona fide acquisition of bills is discussed, and the types of people with nowhere to be separated are subdivided. The fourth chapter discusses the legal issue of bill form. This paper puts forward and discusses the legal issues of the form of instruments, including that the contents of the notes should conform to the legal provisions, that the recording methods of the bills should conform to the legal provisions and that the carriers of the notes should conform to the legal provisions. The fifth chapter discusses the protection of the rights of legal bearer. Mainly discussed the bill loss relief and bill infringement relief. This paper discusses the protection of the rights of the relative loss and absolute loss of the bill in the relief of bill loss, and discusses the relief problem on the occasion of the forgery of the ticket and the forgery of endorsement in the relief of the infringement of the bill.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.287
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王雪莹;浅析票据法对形式正义的追求[J];当代法学;2002年11期
2 孙椺;浅论我国票据法中正当持票人制度[J];贵州民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年06期
3 王艳梅;;票据效力确认的起源、原则与外在表达[J];当代法学;2012年06期
4 吴在勤;论英美合同法中的对价[J];法学评论;1992年03期
5 汪世虎;论票据行为的无因性[J];海南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2003年03期
6 钱玉林;论票据权利的善意取得[J];淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年04期
7 吕来明;票据权利善意取得的适用[J];法学研究;1998年05期
8 于永芹;试析我国票据对价制度[J];山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年06期
9 刘承韪;;英美合同法中对价原则之功能分析[J];中外法学;2006年05期
10 刘承韪;;契约法理论的历史嬗迭与现代发展 以英美契约法为核心的考察[J];中外法学;2011年04期
本文编号:1983999
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/touziyanjiulunwen/1983999.html