我国证券虚假陈述民事赔偿制度研究
[Abstract]:As a common but harmful phenomenon in the securities market, the misrepresentation of the securities market has great harm to the smooth operation of the securities market and the legitimate rights and interests of the investors. It is an effective way to punish the deceiver and compensate the economic benefit of the victim through the civil compensation system, which can punish the evil and promote the good, deter the lawless, and balance the interests of both sides. At present, there are still many problems to be solved in our country's legislation and practice. Focusing on the preprocedure, the principle of imputation, the causality, the compensation for damages, the determination of the litigation mode, and combining with the foreign civil compensation system, the author focuses on the theoretical analysis of the preprocedure, the principle of attribution, the causality, the compensation for damages and the determination of the litigation mode, In order to put forward reasonable and feasible suggestions to the civil compensation system of misrepresentation in China's securities market and better protect the interests of investors in the securities market. The full text is divided into five chapters: the first chapter is an introduction. This paper mainly introduces the background, significance, literature review, writing ideas and methods, innovation and shortcomings of this paper. The second chapter is the basic theory of civil compensation system of securities misrepresentation. This chapter firstly introduces the concept of civil compensation for securities misrepresentation, including the concept of false statement, the expression of false statement and the concept of civil compensation for false statement. It also analyzes the characteristics of misrepresentation civil compensation different from other civil compensation. Finally, it analyzes the three theories that false statement civil compensation liability is regarded as contractual liability, tort liability and independent liability in the theoretical circle. Through the introduction of the above basic theory for the following research and analysis to make theoretical reserves. The third chapter is the current situation and problems of civil compensation system of securities misrepresentation in China. This chapter is mainly about the legal provisions of civil compensation for misrepresentation in our country and some theoretical studies of domestic scholars, respectively, from the aspects of pre-procedure, imputation principle, causality, compensation for damages and the determination of litigation mode, etc. Combined with some experience in judicial practice, this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the existing legal system, and finally summarizes the five problems that need to be solved in the current civil compensation system of false statements. The fourth chapter is the experience of foreign securities misrepresentation civil compensation system. This chapter mainly introduces the development of the securities civil compensation system in the United States, Japan and Taiwan, as well as the existing specific legal regulation and civil compensation system on misrepresentation. By studying and drawing lessons from the legal system of civil compensation for securities fraud in other countries and regions, we hope to broaden our vision, understand the advantages and disadvantages of different legal provisions, and provide experience for the perfection of our country's securities legal system. The fifth chapter is the perfection of civil compensation system of securities misrepresentation in our country. This chapter mainly from the substantive law angle and the procedural law angle, according to the third chapter proposed in our country false statement civil compensation system existence question, unifies the fourth chapter in the foreign country and the region some valuable experience, In order to make the civil compensation system of false statement develop better in our country, this paper puts forward the methods of modifying and perfecting the civil compensation system of securities in our country.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.287
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 汤欣;高海涛;;证券市场操纵行为认定研究——行政处罚案例的视角[J];当代法学;2016年04期
2 岳冰;;证券欺诈民事救济的困境与出路[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2016年01期
3 陈颖;周晗燕;;我国证券民事赔偿法律制度之完善[J];公民与法(法学版);2015年12期
4 周平奇;;证券法修改背景下虚假陈述民事责任立法[J];华中师范大学研究生学报;2015年02期
5 廖铭辉;;证券欺诈诉讼之比较法视野——以我国台湾地区证券投资人团体诉讼制度为核心之探讨[J];贵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2015年01期
6 贾纬;;证券市场侵权民事责任之完善[J];法律适用;2014年07期
7 张春丽;;论我国证券欺诈赔偿责任机制的完善[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2014年03期
8 甘培忠;彭运朋;;论证券虚假陈述民事赔偿中系统风险所致损失数额的认定[J];甘肃社会科学;2014年01期
9 樊纪伟;;日本金融商品交易欺诈民事责任制度及其借鉴[J];经济法论丛;2013年02期
10 黄辉;;中国证券虚假陈述民事赔偿制度:实证分析与政策建议[J];证券法苑;2013年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 刘文;;前置程序成历史 证券民事赔偿之路向何方?[N];证券时报;2016年
2 李培华;殷进亮;;完善证券法民事赔偿规则的思考[N];人民法院报;2014年
3 张炜;;证券民事赔偿遭遇困境[N];中国经济时报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 刘艳军;论证券欺诈诉讼[D];西南政法大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 张卓颖;论我国证券欺诈群体诉讼制度的构建与完善[D];华东政法大学;2014年
2 孙榕;论证券市场虚假陈述民事责任[D];山东大学;2014年
3 史丽玲;证券虚假陈述民事责任问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2013年
4 洪海涛;论我国证券民事赔偿诉讼模式[D];复旦大学;2011年
,本文编号:2285631
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/touziyanjiulunwen/2285631.html