基于知识溢出的校企合作知识投入决策模型

发布时间：2018-03-28 14:41

本文选题：供给侧改革　切入点：知识溢出　出处：《科技管理研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：立足于"大众创业、万众创新"强化企业创新主体地位,激发高校创新潜力,推动供给侧改革的现实背景,选择协同创新异质性知识的关键溢出源校、企作为研究主体,以影响知识投入决策的机制和因素作为研究对象,根据不同知识溢出程度将校企合作类别分为连接模式、嵌入模式和耦合模式,建构Stackelberg主从博弈模型,分别讨论不同合作模式下校企的知识投入条件。研究表明:不同合作模式下的合作阈值并不相同,但领导者占有优势均为合作契约化的基本条件;边际知识产出、知识匹配感知度和知识转化能力的正向激励效应对跟随者的影响强于对领导者;高度的知识溢出使溢出成本增加,使得双方进入投入困境,可以通过保证双方核心知识投入成固定比例来框定双方的责任和义务,有利于双方承担责任和规避风险,最终促进合作的达成。
[Abstract]:Based on "mass entrepreneurship, mass innovation" to strengthen the main position of enterprise innovation, stimulate the innovation potential of colleges and universities, promote supply-side reform, select the key spillover source school of collaborative innovation heterogeneity knowledge, enterprises as the main body of research. Taking the mechanism and factors that affect the decision of knowledge input as the object of study, according to the different degree of knowledge spillover, the cooperation between school and enterprise is divided into three types: linking mode, embedded mode and coupling mode, and the Stackelberg master-slave game model is constructed. The research shows that the threshold of cooperation is not the same under different cooperation mode, but the advantage of leaders is the basic condition of cooperation contract, the marginal knowledge output, The positive incentive effect of knowledge matching perception and knowledge transformation ability has stronger influence on follower than on leader, and high knowledge spillover increases spillover cost, which makes both sides enter into investment dilemma. The responsibility and obligation of both sides can be defined by ensuring that the core knowledge of both sides is invested in a fixed proportion, which is helpful for both sides to assume responsibility and avoid risks, and finally to promote the achievement of cooperation.
【作者单位】：重庆大学经济与工商管理学院//重庆市协同创新知识产权研究中心//重庆自主品牌汽车协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“面向产学研协同创新联盟稳定性的知识产权冲突管理机制研究”(15BGL024)
【分类号】：G647;F279.2

【相似文献】