利他偏好下需求依赖于价格和营销努力的两级供应链决策与协调

发布时间：2018-05-03 14:03

本文选题：供应链管理 + 利他偏好　；参考：《中央财经大学学报》2017年12期

【摘要】：随着市场竞争日益激烈,供应链成员通过利他合作最大限度地扩大市场销量、提高各方经济收益显得尤为重要。笔者通过文献梳理发现,已有研究主要考察了利他偏好对成员的定价决策以及批发价格契约协调效果的影响,尚未探索成员具有利他偏好时供应链的有效协调机制,且研究中没有考虑零售商的营销努力因素。笔者在Stackelberg价格博弈模型基础上增加了零售商营销努力决策变量,分别构建了考虑利他偏好的批发价格契约模型、收益共享契约模型、收益共享成本共担契约模型,分析了利他偏好对供应链决策的影响,探讨了批发价格契约、收益共享契约以及收益共享成本共担契约对供应链的协调性。笔者认为:制造商对零售商的利他行为可以激励零售商提高营销努力水平;批发价格契约和收益共享契约均不能解决制造商与零售商因考虑自身利益而造成供应链出现双重边际化效应的问题;通过合理设计收益共享成本共担契约,制造商和零售商能够找到最佳的利他偏好组合实现最大共赢。
[Abstract]:With the increasingly fierce competition in the market, it is particularly important for supply chain members to maximize market sales and improve economic returns through altruistic cooperation. The author finds that the influence of altruistic preference on the pricing decision of members and the coordination effect of wholesale price contract has been investigated, and the effective coordination mechanism of supply chain when members have altruistic preference has not been explored. And the research does not consider the retailer's marketing efforts. Based on the Stackelberg price game model, the author adds the decision variables of retailer's marketing effort, and constructs the wholesale price contract model, the revenue sharing contract model and the revenue sharing cost sharing contract model considering altruistic preference respectively. This paper analyzes the influence of altruistic preference on supply chain decision, and discusses the coordination of wholesale price contract, revenue sharing contract and revenue sharing cost sharing contract on supply chain. The author thinks: the manufacturer's altruistic behavior to the retailer can stimulate the retailer to improve the marketing effort level; Both the wholesale price contract and the profit sharing contract can not solve the problem that the manufacturer and the retailer cause the double marginalization effect in the supply chain because of considering their own interests. Manufacturers and retailers can find the best combination of altruistic preferences to achieve maximum win-win.
【作者单位】：辽宁工程技术大学营销管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目“农村市场渠道管理效率研究——基于三方博弈的角度”(项目编号:71172218);国家自然科学基金资助项目“儒家价值观对农村市场买卖关系影响的模型研究”(项目编号:71202117) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金联合资助类课题“城市化进程中农民市民消费特征和模式研究——基于心理和行为角度”(项目编号:20122121110005)
【分类号】：F274

【相似文献】