伦理型领导对员工伦理问题报告的作用机制研究

发布时间：2018-06-17 12:16

本文选题：伦理型领导 + 伦理问题报告　；参考：《华中科技大学》2016年博士论文

【摘要】：近年来,组织中的非伦理行为与伦理失范问题频发,对组织的长期绩效和持续发展造成了严重危害。由于非伦理行为存在隐蔽性,监督成本较高,鼓励员工主动报告伦理问题已成为组织加强伦理管理的重要手段。而作为一种积极领导行为,伦理型领导专注于伦理管理,对激发员工的伦理行为具有直接的影响效应。通过对伦理型领导与伦理问题报告相关文献的梳理,发现当前伦理型领导对伦理问题报告的作用机制研究存在着以下三方面的不足：一是仅从降低消极认知的角度解释伦理型领导激发伦理问题报告的心理机制,忽视了积极心理能力的作用；二是过度强调伦理型领导影响伦理问题报告的认知过程,忽视了伦理行为激发的情感机制；三是仅从单一层面探讨伦理型领导对伦理问题报告的促发过程,忽视了群体内多层面与跨层面的作用机制。基于此,本文通过三个实证研究从道德意动能力视角、道德情绪视角以及道德信息加工视角,探讨了伦理型领导激发伦理问题报告的认知驱动路径、情感驱动路径以及多层次与跨层次作用过程。实证研究一从道德意动能力视角探讨道德效力在伦理型领导与伦理问题报告间的中介作用以及道德认同在其中的调节效应。通过为期一个半月的两阶段问卷调查方式,收集了多个企业的326名员工样本。层级线性回归分析结果表明,伦理型领导显著正向影响员工的伦理问题报告,道德效力在二者间起部分中介作用。此外,道德认同显著正向调节伦理型领导与伦理问题报告间的关系,显著负向调节伦理型领导与道德效力间的关系,同时对道德效力在伦理型领导与伦理问题报告间的中介作用具有显著调节效应。实证研究二基于情感事件理论,采用问卷调查与情境实验相结合的方法,分别检验稳定情感状态与短时情绪体验在伦理型领导激发员工伦理问题报告过程中的作用。研究方法一采用两阶段问卷调查方式收集了318名员工样本数据。研究方法二以96名大学生为对象,采用了2(伦理型领导：伦理VS非伦理)×2(道德强度：高VS低)的情境实验设计。研究结果表明,道德情绪在伦理型领导与伦理问题报告的正向关系间起部分中介作用。此外,道德强度显著调节伦理型领导与道德情绪之间的关系,同时显著调节道德情绪在伦理型领导与伦理问题报告之间的中介效应。实证研究三通过构建多层次模型,从道德信息加工视角探讨伦理型领导对伦理问题报告的多层次与跨层次作用机制。采用两阶段问卷调查方式收集67名团队领导与302名员工调查样本。HLM的分析结果表明,团队导向与个体导向的伦理型领导均对员工伦理问题报告具有显著正向作用；伦理氛围完全中介团队导向的伦理型领导与伦理问题报告之间的关系；伦理氛围与伦理型领导感知差异化对个体导向的伦理型领导与伦理问题报告间的关系均有显著调节效应。最后,本文总结了主要研究结论与理论启示,并指出本文的研究局限及未来研究方向。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the unethical and ethical anomie problems in the organization have caused serious harm to the long-term performance and sustainable development of the organization. Because of the concealment of the non ethical behavior, the high cost of supervision and the encouragement of the staff to report the ethical problems have become an important means to strengthen the ethical management. Therefore, ethical leadership focuses on ethical management and has a direct impact on the ethical behavior of employees. Through the combing of relevant literature on ethical leadership and ethical issues, it is found that there are three shortcomings in the study of the role mechanism of ethical leadership on ethical issues: one is to reduce negative recognition only. The point of view is to explain the psychological mechanism of ethical leaders to stimulate ethical issues and ignore the role of positive mental abilities; two the overemphasis on the cognitive process of ethical leadership to influence ethical issues, and the neglect of the emotional mechanism inspired by ethical behavior; and the three is to report ethical leadership to ethical issues only from a single level. On the basis of three empirical studies, this paper discusses the cognitive drive path, emotional driving path, multi-level and cross layer from the perspective of moral intention, moral emotion and moral information processing. An empirical study on the mediating role of moral effectiveness between ethical leadership and ethical issues and the regulatory effect of moral identity from the perspective of moral activity. Through a two stage questionnaire for one and a half months, a sample of 326 employees in multiple enterprises was collected. A hierarchical linear regression analysis was used. The results show that ethical leadership has a significant positive impact on the ethical issues of employees, and moral effectiveness plays a partial intermediary role between the two. In addition, moral identity significantly regulates the relationship between ethical leadership and ethical issues, and significantly negatively regulates the relationship between ethical leadership and the effectiveness of Taoist ethics, and moral effectiveness in ethics. The intermediary role of type leadership and ethical problem reports has significant moderating effect. Empirical study two, based on the theory of emotional events, uses a combination of questionnaire and situational experiments to examine the role of stable emotional state and short-term emotional experience in the process of stimulating the staff 's problem report by ethical leadership. A two stage questionnaire was used to collect 318 employee sample data. The study method two took 96 college students as subjects, and adopted 2 (Ethical Leadership: ethical VS non ethical) x 2 (moral intensity: high VS low) situational experiment design. The results showed that moral emotion was between the positive relationship between the ethics leadership and the ethical problem report. In addition, the moral intensity significantly regulates the relationship between ethical leadership and moral emotion, and significantly regulates the mediating effect of moral emotion between ethical leadership and ethical problem reports. Empirical study three discusses ethical leadership's report on ethical issues from the perspective of moral information addition. The results of the two stage questionnaire survey of 67 team leaders and 302 employee survey samples.HLM showed that team oriented and individual oriented ethical leadership had a significant positive effect on the staff ethics report, and the ethical climate was completely mediated by the ethical leadership. The relationship between guidance and ethical issues reports; the difference between ethical atmosphere and ethical leadership perception has a significant adjustment effect on the relationship between individual oriented ethical leadership and ethical problem reports. Finally, this paper summarizes the main research conclusions and theoretical enlightenment, and points out the limitations of the research and the future research direction.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：F272.92

【相似文献】