组织场域研究脉络梳理与未来展望

发布时间：2018-07-24 10:58

【摘要】：本文以组织场域为研究对象,比较了理性选择制度主义和组织制度主义;厘清了组织场域的内涵和类型,对比分析了新兴场域和成熟场域;并依据组织场域固化和演化的视角,将场域成员分为制度遵从者和制度创业者的基础上,通过被动制度同构和主动制度创业两种制度逻辑对相关研究进行了梳理。固化视角的制度同构回答了"组织为什么会相似"的问题,实现了场域的同质性;演化视角的制度创业伴随着制度从无到有以及从旧到新的变迁,回答了"制度从哪里来"的问题,实现了场域的异质性。进一步地,从制度逻辑和研究层次对组织场域的研究进行了展望,未来可以考虑制度同构和制度创业的情境和整合研究,可以考虑场域中临时成员、亚场域、跨场域和跨国公司所处的双重组织场域的问题。此外,也可以从这两个方面进行交叉分析,以深化该领域的研究。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the organization field as the research object, compares the rational choice institutionalism with the organizational institutionalism, clarifies the connotation and type of the organization field, compares the emerging field and the mature field, and according to the perspective of organizational field solidification and evolution, On the basis of dividing the field members into system follower and system entrepreneur, the paper combs the related research by passive institutional isomorphism and active institutional entrepreneurship. The institutional isomorphism from the solidified perspective answers the question of "why organizations are similar" and realizes the homogeneity of the field; the institutional entrepreneurship from the evolutionary perspective is accompanied by the institutional changes from scratch and from the old to the new. It answers the question of where the system comes from and realizes the heterogeneity of the field. Furthermore, from the perspective of institutional logic and research level, this paper looks forward to the study of organizational field. In the future, we can consider the situation and integration of institutional isomorphism and institutional entrepreneurship, and consider the temporary members and subfield of the field. Cross-field and multinational companies in the dual organizational field of the problem. In addition, cross-analysis can be carried out from these two aspects in order to deepen the research in this field.
【作者单位】：太原理工大学经济管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金青年项目(71402113) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(14YJC630006)
【分类号】：F272.9

【共引文献】