当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 企业经济论文 >

中间品区别定价行为的竞争效应与反垄断规制——基于讨价还价理论的分析

发布时间:2018-08-15 15:30
【摘要】:随着整个产业链的主导权逐渐由上游厂商向下游厂商转移,下游厂商对市场控制能力不断上升,所具有的讨价还价能力也不断增强,进而导致上游厂商对中间品实行区别定价,并对下游弱势厂商产生"水床效应"。本文以上游垄断-下游寡头的市场结构为基准,在上下游厂商都具有一定讨价还价能力的情形下分析中间品区别定价的竞争效应。结果表明,当上游厂商选择讨价还价能力强的下游厂商进行统一定价协商时,统一定价时的消费者福利高于区别定价情形;当上游厂商选择讨价还价能力弱的下游厂商进行统一定价协商时,统一定价时的消费者福利低于区别定价情形;不论上游厂商选择强势或弱势下游厂商进行价格协商,统一定价时下游厂商的利润和社会总福利总是高于区别定价情形。因此,对中间品区别定价行为的反垄断规制应考虑到上下游厂商的讨价还价能力,应将"市场支配地位"标准延伸至"相对经济优势"。
[Abstract]:As the leading power of the whole industry chain is gradually transferred from the upstream manufacturer to the downstream firm, the downstream manufacturer's ability to control the market is constantly rising, and the bargaining power of the downstream manufacturer is also continuously enhanced, which leads to the upstream manufacturer to carry out the differentiated pricing of the intermediate goods. And to the downstream weak manufacturer produces "the water bed effect". Based on the market structure of upstream monopoly and downstream oligopoly, this paper analyzes the competitive effect of intermediate differential pricing under the condition that upstream and downstream firms have a certain bargaining power. The results show that when upstream firms choose downstream firms with strong bargaining power to negotiate unified pricing, consumers' welfare is higher than differential pricing. When upstream firms choose downstream firms with weak bargaining power to negotiate unified pricing, consumers' welfare is lower than differential pricing when unified pricing; whether upstream firms choose strong or weak downstream firms to negotiate prices, The profits and total social welfare of downstream firms are always higher than those of differential pricing. Therefore, the antitrust regulation of differentiated pricing of intermediate products should take into account the bargaining power of upstream and downstream firms, and extend the criterion of "market dominant position" to "relative economic advantage".
【作者单位】: 湖南农业大学经济学院;中南财经政法大学工商管理学院;肇庆学院经济与管理学院;
【基金】:国家社科基金青年项目,项目编号:15CJY001 湖南省社科基金项目,项目编号:14YBA203 湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目资助 湖南省社科成果评审委员会课题,项目编号:XSP17YBZC086
【分类号】:F274

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 邹兹妮;;浅论我国外资并购中的反垄断规制[J];现代经济信息;2008年11期

2 应品广;;经营者集中反垄断规制的理由:一个不确定的立场[J];安徽大学法律评论;2009年02期

3 张亚芸,潘建亭;对公司并购的反垄断规制——兼论我国的反垄断立法[J];中国工业经济;1999年10期

4 ;[J];;年期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 高琳;欧美跨国并购反垄断规制实质性标准比较[D];华东政法大学;2010年



本文编号:2184631

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/xmjj/2184631.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8e252***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com