“资源诅咒”视角下的俄、澳资源模式比较

发布时间：2018-05-24 10:33

本文选题：俄罗斯 + 澳大利亚　；参考：《华东师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：自然资源作为物质生产活动的必要投入品,成为国家经济发展的重要物质基础,对于国家经济的发展具有不言而喻的影响力。俄罗斯和澳大利亚同为资源丰沛国家,进入新世纪以来两国的资源部门进一步繁荣,成为国家经济的重要组成部分。因而,资源经济的发展状况关系到两国整体经济的稳定。上世纪80年代兴起的“资源诅咒”命题却认为,资源禀赋富足的国家之所以不能实现经济的长久稳定增长,是因为充裕的自然资源对经济增长和社会发展具有阻碍作用。这一命题一经提出便引发了学界和政治家的广泛关注。鉴于“资源诅咒”命题强调资源禀赋丰裕度与经济增长之间的负相关关系,本文特对这一命题的主要逻辑和理论观点进行了清晰的梳理。同时,选取俄罗斯和澳大利亚为案例,对比分析两国的资源禀赋及资源经济状况。为更为全面的进行对比研究,本文从“资源诅咒”命题的视角出发,通过贸易状况恶化、“荷兰病”效应、制度弱化以及挤出人力资本这几个主要的引发机制,综合评估了两国资源经济模式中的优劣所在,并深入分析了导致两国呈现不同表现的背后因素。在理论总结和案例分析的基础上,本文就研究中发现的“资源诅咒”命题所具有的理论解释力及存在的缺陷进行分析和总结,同时有针对性的提出两国应对丰裕资源冲击的战略和政策建议。
[Abstract]:As a necessary input of material production activities, natural resources have become an important material basis for national economic development and have a self-evident influence on the development of national economy. Russia and Australia are both resource-rich countries. In the new century, the resources departments of the two countries have further flourished and become an important part of the national economy. As a result, the development of the resource economy is related to the stability of the overall economy of the two countries. However, the proposition of "resource curse" that emerged in the 1980s holds that the reason why rich countries can not achieve long-term and stable economic growth is that abundant natural resources hinder economic growth and social development. Once this proposition was put forward, it aroused the widespread concern of scholars and politicians. In view of the fact that the proposition of "resource curse" emphasizes the negative correlation between the abundance of resource endowment and economic growth, this paper makes a clear analysis of the main logical and theoretical points of view of this proposition. At the same time, taking Russia and Australia as cases, the paper compares the resource endowment and resource economy of the two countries. In order to make a more comprehensive comparative study, this paper starts from the perspective of "resource curse" proposition, through the deterioration of the trade situation, the "Dutch disease" effect, the weakening of the system and the extrusion of human capital. The advantages and disadvantages of the two countries' resource economy models are comprehensively evaluated, and the factors behind the two countries' different performance are analyzed in depth. On the basis of theoretical summary and case analysis, this paper analyzes and summarizes the theoretical explanatory power and defects of the "resource curse" proposition found in the research. At the same time, the two countries targeted to deal with the impact of abundant resources strategy and policy recommendations.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F151.2;F161.1;F205

【参考文献】