票据背书连续制度研究

发布时间：2018-06-26 04:37

本文选题：背书连续 + 空白背书　；参考：《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：票据是一种流通证券，票据在商品经济中的重要作用是通过流通来实现的，只有流通起来的票据才能真正实现其价值，而票据流通的主要手段则是背书，票据当事人通过背书来完成票据的转让，从而进行票据权利的转移，背书转让制度使得票据能够迅速的流通，因此各国票据立法都将促进票据的流通作为一项重要任务。当票据通过背书转让流通起来以后，票据前后手之间的这种背书转让是否具有连续性对于背书的法律效力以及持票人、票据债务人等票据当事人权利的实现具有重要意义。然而在票据实务及司法实践中，由于我国法律规定的相对不完善，票据当事人以及法官在判断背书是否连续时产生了一些矛盾和分歧，这势必会影响票据的正常流通，妨碍我国市场经济的健康发展。因此本文就背书连续的相关问题展开，通过理论与实践相结合、比较分析等方法分五个部分对票据背书连续的相关问题进行论述。本文首先概述了背书连续的基本问题，然后选取票据实务中常见的空白背书、背书涂销、背书伪造、非转让背书等背书行为，分别阐述了其对背书连续可能产生的影响，并尝试给出了相应的制度完善建议：①对于空白背书，应明确承认空白背书的法律效力；规定空白背书的转让方式；承认空白背书的连续性。②对于背书涂销，应明确票据涂销行为及其效力；明确背书涂销行为及其效力；对背书涂销与背书连续问题，可以套用我国台湾地区“票据法”进行规制，即涂销的背书对背书连续无影响的视为已涂销，对背书连续有影响的视为未涂销。③对于背书伪造，由于《票据法》第31条与32条存在矛盾，建议将第32条重新修正，并将第57条与票据法司法解释中的精神相结合进行完善；④对于非转让背书，应将《票据法》第35条1款进行完善，允许委托收款后的再委托收款行为并禁止委托收款背书后的再质押行为；并对第35条2款进行完善，，明确规定质押背书中质权人的票据权利仅限于付款请求权和追索权，并禁止持票人的再行转让或质押行为。
[Abstract]:Negotiable instrument is a kind of negotiable securities. The important role of bill in commodity economy is realized through circulation. Only negotiable instruments can truly realize their value, and the main means of negotiable instruments are endorsement. The parties to negotiable instruments carry out the transfer of bills through endorsement so as to transfer the rights of bills and endorse the transfer system. So the bill can be circulated quickly, so the bill legislation in all countries will promote the circulation of the bill as an important task. When the bill is transferred through endorsement, whether the endorsement between the bill and the back hand has continuity to the legal effect of the endorsement and the bill holder, the bill debtor and other bills as the human rights. The realization of profit is of great significance. However, in the practice of bill and the judicial practice, because of the relative imperfect laws of our country, the parties and judges of the bill have produced some contradictions and differences when judging whether the endorsement is continuous or not. This will certainly affect the normal circulation of the bill and hinder the healthy development of the market economy of our country. The related issues of endorsement are carried out. Through the combination of theory and practice, comparative analysis and other methods are discussed in five parts.
This article first summarizes the basic problems of endorsement continuity, and then selects the common blank endorsement in the practice of the bill, the endorsement sale, the endorsement and the non assignment endorsement, and expounds the possible effects of the endorsement on the endorsement of the endorsement, and attempts to give the corresponding suggestions for the improvement of the system: (1) the blank endorsement should be clearly recognized. The legal effect of the white endorsement, the transfer mode of the blank endorsement, the continuity of the blank endorsement, and the continuity of the endorsement of the blank. (2) for the endorsement of the endorsement, the act and effectiveness of the bill should be clearly defined; the act and effect of the endorsement of the endorsement should be clearly defined; the issue of endorsement and endorsement of endorsement can be applied to the regulation of the "bill law" in the Taiwan area of China, that is to say, The endorsement of the endorsement, which has no influence on the endorsement of the endorsement, is deemed to have been applied, and that the endorsement has a continuous impact on the endorsement. (3) for the forgery of the endorsement, the thirty-second article is amended as a result of the contradiction between the thirty-first articles and the 32 articles, and the combination of the fifty-seventh and the spirit of the legal interpretation of the bill law should be perfected; (4) for the non transfer endorsement, The thirty-fifth articles of "bill law" are perfected, the act of re entrustment after the entrustment is allowed and the re pledge after the endorsement of the entrustment is prohibited; and the thirty-fifth 2 paragraphs are perfected, and the right of the pledge of the pledgee in the pledge endorsement is clearly limited to the right of request for payment and the right of recourse, and the further transfer or pledge of the holder is prohibited. Yes.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.287

【参考文献】