法治社会中法律的界限研究

发布时间：2018-02-02 08:55

本文关键词： 法治法律界限特点实现途径　出处：《扬州大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：社会对法律的普遍认同并通过法律避免或解决纠纷的意识是法治建设所不可缺少的理念支撑,但推崇法治、信仰法律的前提在于对法治与法律的理性认知。法律并非万能之器,法治建设也并非“法治大跃进”。在法治社会中,法律有因其价值追求而不应为的领域,也有因自身能力局限而无法胜任的事务。面对法律的“应”与“不应”、“能”与“不能”,立法者、执法者、司法者只有坚守法律的“本分”才能避免对社会的不当压制以及对法律能量的不当消耗,以实现法治事业的稳健发展。而关于法律的界限具体如何则着实难以描述,尤其是在法治社会中,法律所涉及的领域相当广泛,不同性质的法律目的、范围各异,很难提供统一、可供操作的“标准性尺子”,因此,从不同维度进行迂回探索便成为替代方法。而随着对法律内容与形式、手段与工具上特点的深入考察,可以发现,在不同视域下,法律有着不同的界限要求。法律的界限不仅涉及法律可以调整或不应调整的领域,还包括在法律调整范围内法律手段所应达到的程度问题,这也说明,法律的界限并不是针对所有法律、某类法律或者是某个法律的泛泛而谈,而是具体法律规范所需考量的标准。正当有益的法律规定应当同时满足不同视域下法律的界限要求。而法律终究由人制定,其具体内容是否适当、必要、均衡最终取决于人的主观判断,法律的界限具体如何不可避免地包含着主观因素,故而,法律的界限又与其所处的时空相关。在不同时期、不同地域可能会有不同的价值理念,法律的边界也会有所不同,并且随着时间的发展,随着价值判断与选择的变化,法律的界限也会随之扩张或限缩。在我国的法治建设过程中,恰当的法律规定对政治经济建设的推动作用显而易见,但并非所有的法律条文都能万无一失,我国现行法律中不乏存有争议甚至饱受诟病的条款。为了避免权力与情感上的冲动,避免法律在制定、运行各个环节僭越的风险,不仅需要不断提高法律职业者的素质,更需要健全预防与惩戒机制,为法律“适得其所”提供制度保障。
[Abstract]:The general recognition of the law and the consciousness of avoiding or resolving disputes through the law is an indispensable concept support for the construction of the rule of law, but the rule of law is respected. The premise of belief in law lies in the rational cognition of the rule of law and the law. Law is not a universal instrument, nor is the construction of the rule of law "the great leap forward of the rule of law". In a society governed by law, law has a field that should not be due to its pursuit of value. There are also incompetent affairs because of their own limitations. Facing the law "should" and "should not", "can" and "cannot", legislators, law enforcers. Only by adhering to the "duty" of the law can the judiciary avoid the improper suppression of the society and the improper consumption of the legal energy. In order to achieve the steady development of the cause of the rule of law. But it is difficult to describe the specific boundaries of the law, especially in the society of the rule of law, the law involves a wide range of fields, different nature of the legal purposes. The range is varied and it is difficult to provide a uniform, operable "standard ruler", so exploring roundabout from different dimensions becomes an alternative. And with the content and form of the law. From the in-depth investigation of the characteristics of the means and tools, it can be found that under different horizons, the law has different boundary requirements. The limits of the law not only involve the areas in which the law can be adjusted or should not be adjusted. It also includes the question of the extent to which legal means should be achieved in the context of legal adjustment, which also shows that the limits of law are not addressed to all laws, certain types of laws or the generality of a particular law. It is the standard that the concrete legal norm needs to consider. The legitimate and beneficial legal provisions should meet the boundary requirements of the law under different horizons at the same time. However, the law is ultimately formulated by the person, whether its specific content is appropriate and necessary. The equilibrium ultimately depends on the subjective judgment of the human being, and how the boundaries of the law inevitably contain subjective factors, therefore, the boundaries of the law are related to the time and space in which they are located, and in different periods. Different regions may have different values, the boundaries of law will be different, and with the development of time, with the change of value judgment and choice. In the process of our country's legal construction, the proper legal provisions can promote the political and economic construction obviously, but not all the legal provisions can be foolproof. In order to avoid the power and emotional impulse, to avoid the risk of the law in making, running all the links overstepped in order to avoid the power and emotional impulse, there are many controversial and even criticized provisions in the current law of our country. It is necessary not only to improve the quality of the legal profession, but also to perfect the mechanism of prevention and punishment so as to provide the system guarantee for the law.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D920.0

【相似文献】