建筑物区分所有权中共有权的行使与救济研究

发布时间：2018-03-14 01:04

本文选题：建筑物区分所有权　切入点：共同共有权　出处：《内蒙古大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：建筑物区分所有权在国外的民法史上一直都是重要的一项不动产所有权形态,尤其是在私有制经济制度主导的国家,这项权利的发展已经相当成熟,只是基于各国的政治、经济以及民法理念的不同,对此权利的界定一直都未形成通说。我国在规定此项权利时,采用的是德国学者贝尔曼提出的三元论学说,即专有权、共有权以及成员权这三种权利相结合而产生的新型不动产物权。这种形式的不动产物权在德国早期国内的《住宅所有权法》中就已经进行了细致的规定,并且德国的这项理论得到大多数国家学者的认同。我国目前主要通过《中华人民共和国物权法》、《最高人民法院关于审理建筑物区分所有权纠纷案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》和《物业管理条例》等相关的法律法规来调整城市住宅小区的区分所有权权利义务关系。由于我国对该制度立法起步较晚,大众对这项权利还没有许多了解,尤其对建筑物区分所有权中的共有权权利的认识及权利归属、行使和保护方面明显存在缺失。笔者发现建筑物区分所有权中的共有权与现行民法上的一般共有权即有相似之处,也有区别之处,但建筑物区分所有权中的共有权究竟属于何种共有,共有权利究竟应当以什么样的形式来行使,长期以来这一直都是学说上的重要争议焦点之一。因此研究与探索建筑物区分所有权当中的共有权制度及共有权制度的行使与救济方式,具有重要的理论意义与实践价值。笔者此次就是想通过审判实践中所遇到的建筑物区分所有权中关于共有权纠纷的案例,对小区业主应如何行使共有权与如何进行共有权的救济问题进行一下简单的研究。
[Abstract]:Building ownership has always been an important form of real estate ownership in the history of civil law abroad, especially in the countries where the private ownership economic system dominates. The development of this right is quite mature, only based on the politics of each country. The definition of this right has not formed a general theory for the different ideas of economy and civil law. When our country prescribes this right, it adopts the ternary theory put forward by German scholar Berman, that is, the exclusive right. This form of real estate right has been carefully stipulated in the early German "Residential ownership Law", which is a new type of real estate property which comes from the combination of the three rights of co-ownership and member right. And this theory of Germany has been approved by most scholars in most countries. At present, our country mainly adopts the Law of the people's Republic of China on Real right, and the Supreme people's Court applies the law in handling disputes over the ownership of buildings. Explanation of several problems and relevant laws and regulations, such as the property Management regulations, to adjust the relationship between the rights and obligations of differentiated ownership in urban residential areas. Because of the late start of legislation on this system in our country, There is not much public understanding of this right, in particular the recognition and attribution of co-ownership rights in condominium ownership of buildings, The author finds that there are similarities and differences between the common ownership and the common ownership in the current civil law. However, what kind of common ownership is the common right in the ownership of the building, and what kind of form should the common right be exercised? For a long time, this has always been one of the important controversial points in theory. Therefore, the study and exploration of the system of co-ownership and the exercise and relief of the system of co-ownership of buildings, It has important theoretical and practical value. This time, the author wants to pass the case of condominium right dispute in the trial practice. This paper makes a simple study on how to exercise the co-ownership and how to carry out the relief of co-ownership.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】