文化产业管理体制比较研究
发布时间：2018-07-16 07:47
【摘要】：文化是历史基因,是民族血脉,是精神家园,同时也是政治风景,是经济指征,是社会貌像。随着全球化、网络化时代的到来,文化产业发展水平已成了决定国家软实力和文化竞争力的关键因素。文化产业是世界经济的重要组成部分,是我国文化建设中的重要内容。为找到推动文化产业快速健康发展的道路,进行管理体制理论上的探究十分必要。文化产业管理体制相较于文化体制来说,更符合经济全球化背景下的研究话语体系,也使理论指导实践的方向更加明确。 本论文着眼于文化产业管理体制形成和发展的轨迹,以政治学理论和发展经济学理论为依据,用制度分析的方法,比较研究世界上具有代表性国家的文化产业管理体制的表现形式和内在特征,比较研究我国具有代表性的行政区域的文化产业管理体制的运行状态,初步探究我国文化产业管理体制所具备的特点、所存在的问题、所应具备的解决思路。论文首先探求了文化的涵义、特征和作用,辨析了文化事业、文化经济与文化产业的异同和联系,整理了文化体制、文化政策和文化产业管理体制之间的相互关系,提出了采用国际通用的话语体系来研究文化产业管理体制的课题。然后,论文选取了美国、法国、日本等部分西方发达国家和韩国、印度等部分新兴经济国家作为研究对象,从这些国家的文化产业形成发展的特点、政府管理机构、民间组织管理、政府管理机制等方面进行比较分析,尝试找到可资借鉴的经验和做法。其后,论文落脚于我国文化产业管理体制的发源、形成和发展、面临的情势,比较分析了京津沪渝四个直辖市和粤湘陕宁四个省份的文化行政管理部门的施行文化产业管理职能的运行情况,初步归纳出我国目前文化产业管理体制存在着如何处理好“魂”与“体”、“战略”与“战术”、“机构”与“权责”、“政府”与“市场”、“繁荣”与“规范”等方面关系的问题,提出了从秉承中华优秀传统文化、正确履行政府职能、科学设置政府机构及加强文化立法工作等四个方面解决问题的思路。 本文努力在以下三个方面尝试创新：第一,在研究视角上,将文化产业管理体制从文化体制中独立出来研究,将政府管理与文化产业紧密结合起来研究,跳出文化来看文化产业,引入比较政治学的研究方法来看文化产业,以期比较完整、系统地厘清文化产业与政治、经济的关系,初步摸清文化产业管理体制的形成要素、特性表征及趋势走向,第二,在研究过程上,将文献分析法和个案研究法结合起来,将与文化产业密切相关的各门学科融会贯通,以期通过国外看国内,通过历史看未来,找到文化产业管理体制的源与流。第三,在研究结论上,力图通过比较分析,找到我国在构建有自身特色的文化产业管理体制时出现或存在的一些问题,以高度的文化自信去借鉴、以高度的文化自觉来完善,提出我国的文化产业管理体制深化改革的一点思路,推动我国文化产业的不断进步。
[Abstract]:Culture is a historical gene, a national blood, a spiritual home, a political landscape, an economic indication and a social appearance. With the advent of globalization and the advent of the network era, the development level of cultural industry has become a key factor in determining the soft power and cultural competitiveness of the country. In order to find the way to promote the rapid and healthy development of cultural industry, it is necessary to explore the theory of management system in order to promote the rapid and healthy development of cultural industry. The cultural industry management system is more consistent with the research discourse system under the background of economic globalization than in the cultural system, and also makes the direction of the theory guide practice more clear.
This paper focuses on the formation and development of the management system of cultural industry. Based on the theory of political science and the theory of development economics, this paper makes a comparative study of the forms and internal characteristics of the cultural industry management system of the representative countries in the world by means of institutional analysis, compared with the study of the representative Administrative Region in China. The operation state of the industrial management system, the preliminary exploration of the characteristics of the cultural industry management system in China, the existing problems and the solutions that should be solved. First, the thesis explores the meaning, characteristics and functions of culture, distinguishes the differences and connections between cultural undertakings, cultural and cultural industries, and collates the cultural system and cultural administration. The relationship between the policy and the management system of cultural industry puts forward the topic of using the international general discourse system to study the management system of cultural industry. Then, the thesis selects some developed countries such as the United States, France, Japan and other western countries, such as Korea, India and other emerging economies as the research object, from the cultural industries of these countries. The characteristics of the formation and development, the government management institutions, the civil organization management, the government management mechanism and so on, try to find the experience and practice that can be used for reference. After that, the paper falls on the origin, formation and development of the management system of cultural industry in China, and compares the four municipalities directly under the central government of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing and Yue Xiangshan. The operation of cultural administration functions in the cultural administration departments of the four provinces in Ningxia Province is carried out, and the preliminary induction of the existence of the current cultural industry management system in our country is how to deal with the "soul" and "body", "strategy" and "tactics", "organization" and "power and responsibility", "government" and "market", "prosperity" and "standard" On the other side, we put forward the thinking of solving the problems from four aspects: adhering to the excellent traditional Chinese culture, correctly performing the function of the government, setting up the government institutions scientifically and strengthening the work of cultural legislation.
This article tries to innovate in the following three aspects: first, in the perspective of research, the cultural industry management system is independent from the cultural system, and the government management and the cultural industry are closely combined to study the culture industry, and the cultural industry is introduced into the culture industry by introducing the comparative political research method, so as to be more complete. Systematically clarifies the relationship between cultural industry and politics and economy, and preliminarily clarifies the elements of formation, characterization and trend of the management system of cultural industry. Second. In the process of research, the literature analysis and case study are combined to integrate the various subjects closely related to the cultural industry, so as to see the domestic and other countries through foreign countries. Through the history of the future, find the source and flow of the management system of cultural industry. Third, in the conclusion of the study, we try to find out some problems in the construction of the cultural industry management system with its own characteristics through comparative analysis, and use the high cultural confidence to learn from it, perfect the cultural consciousness and put forward the culture of our country. A train of thought for deepening the reform of industrial management system will promote the continuous progress of China's cultural industry.
【学位授予单位】：武汉大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G124
，
本文编号：2125724
[Abstract]:Culture is a historical gene, a national blood, a spiritual home, a political landscape, an economic indication and a social appearance. With the advent of globalization and the advent of the network era, the development level of cultural industry has become a key factor in determining the soft power and cultural competitiveness of the country. In order to find the way to promote the rapid and healthy development of cultural industry, it is necessary to explore the theory of management system in order to promote the rapid and healthy development of cultural industry. The cultural industry management system is more consistent with the research discourse system under the background of economic globalization than in the cultural system, and also makes the direction of the theory guide practice more clear.
This paper focuses on the formation and development of the management system of cultural industry. Based on the theory of political science and the theory of development economics, this paper makes a comparative study of the forms and internal characteristics of the cultural industry management system of the representative countries in the world by means of institutional analysis, compared with the study of the representative Administrative Region in China. The operation state of the industrial management system, the preliminary exploration of the characteristics of the cultural industry management system in China, the existing problems and the solutions that should be solved. First, the thesis explores the meaning, characteristics and functions of culture, distinguishes the differences and connections between cultural undertakings, cultural and cultural industries, and collates the cultural system and cultural administration. The relationship between the policy and the management system of cultural industry puts forward the topic of using the international general discourse system to study the management system of cultural industry. Then, the thesis selects some developed countries such as the United States, France, Japan and other western countries, such as Korea, India and other emerging economies as the research object, from the cultural industries of these countries. The characteristics of the formation and development, the government management institutions, the civil organization management, the government management mechanism and so on, try to find the experience and practice that can be used for reference. After that, the paper falls on the origin, formation and development of the management system of cultural industry in China, and compares the four municipalities directly under the central government of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing and Yue Xiangshan. The operation of cultural administration functions in the cultural administration departments of the four provinces in Ningxia Province is carried out, and the preliminary induction of the existence of the current cultural industry management system in our country is how to deal with the "soul" and "body", "strategy" and "tactics", "organization" and "power and responsibility", "government" and "market", "prosperity" and "standard" On the other side, we put forward the thinking of solving the problems from four aspects: adhering to the excellent traditional Chinese culture, correctly performing the function of the government, setting up the government institutions scientifically and strengthening the work of cultural legislation.
This article tries to innovate in the following three aspects: first, in the perspective of research, the cultural industry management system is independent from the cultural system, and the government management and the cultural industry are closely combined to study the culture industry, and the cultural industry is introduced into the culture industry by introducing the comparative political research method, so as to be more complete. Systematically clarifies the relationship between cultural industry and politics and economy, and preliminarily clarifies the elements of formation, characterization and trend of the management system of cultural industry. Second. In the process of research, the literature analysis and case study are combined to integrate the various subjects closely related to the cultural industry, so as to see the domestic and other countries through foreign countries. Through the history of the future, find the source and flow of the management system of cultural industry. Third, in the conclusion of the study, we try to find out some problems in the construction of the cultural industry management system with its own characteristics through comparative analysis, and use the high cultural confidence to learn from it, perfect the cultural consciousness and put forward the culture of our country. A train of thought for deepening the reform of industrial management system will promote the continuous progress of China's cultural industry.
【学位授予单位】：武汉大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G124
，
本文编号：2125724
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zhengzhijingjixuelunwen/2125724.html
