当代中国环境冲突治理的困境与破解
发布时间：2018-08-16 17:07
【摘要】：处于转型期的中国,在政治、经济、社会、文化等各个方面正发生着深刻且重大的变化。正如社会学家贝克所描述的,中国已经进入了“风险社会”。环境冲突成为转型期中国经济发展和生态保护相博弈的产物。近年,由于片面追求GDP的高速增长、合法的环境利益诉求渠道不畅等原因,导致环境冲突问题在数量上处于逐年上升的状态。治理环境冲突已经成为当代中国社会管理的重要任务之一。但是,环境冲突的治理还存在治理主体单一化、治理偏重短期效应、法制保障不足、问责陷入两难等种种困境,需要寻找破解治理困境的路径。突破环境冲突治理的困境,不但要增加治理主体的多元化,更应准确定位政府在环境冲突治理中的角色;以环境冲突预防为先导,冲突控制与冲突化解相互配合,以冲突转化为治理目标;完善既有法律和法规,发展环境公益诉讼制度;从物质和精神两个层面上做好安抚工作,严肃惩治相关责任人;构建冲突治理的事后评价体系,防止环境冲突的复发,为类似的环境冲突治理提供借鉴。
[Abstract]:In the transition period, China is undergoing profound and significant changes in politics, economy, society and culture. As sociologist Baker describes, China has entered a "risk society." Environmental conflict has become the outcome of the game between economic development and ecological protection in China during the transition period. In recent years, due to the one-sided pursuit of the rapid growth of GDP and the lack of channels for legitimate environmental interests, the number of environmental conflicts has increased year by year. Managing environmental conflicts has become one of the important tasks of contemporary Chinese social management. However, the governance of environmental conflict still has some difficulties, such as the simplification of the main body of governance, the emphasis on short-term effect of governance, the lack of legal protection, the dilemma of accountability, and so on, so it is necessary to find a way to solve the dilemma of governance. To break through the plight of environmental conflict management, we should not only increase the diversity of governance subjects, but also accurately position the role of the government in environmental conflict management, take environmental conflict prevention as the forerunner, and coordinate conflict control with conflict resolution. Transform conflict into governance goal; perfect existing laws and regulations, develop environmental public interest litigation system; do a good job of appeasing work from the material and spiritual levels, seriously punish those responsible; build conflict governance post-evaluation system, Prevent the recurrence of environmental conflict and provide reference for similar environmental conflict management.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：X321
本文编号：2186630
[Abstract]:In the transition period, China is undergoing profound and significant changes in politics, economy, society and culture. As sociologist Baker describes, China has entered a "risk society." Environmental conflict has become the outcome of the game between economic development and ecological protection in China during the transition period. In recent years, due to the one-sided pursuit of the rapid growth of GDP and the lack of channels for legitimate environmental interests, the number of environmental conflicts has increased year by year. Managing environmental conflicts has become one of the important tasks of contemporary Chinese social management. However, the governance of environmental conflict still has some difficulties, such as the simplification of the main body of governance, the emphasis on short-term effect of governance, the lack of legal protection, the dilemma of accountability, and so on, so it is necessary to find a way to solve the dilemma of governance. To break through the plight of environmental conflict management, we should not only increase the diversity of governance subjects, but also accurately position the role of the government in environmental conflict management, take environmental conflict prevention as the forerunner, and coordinate conflict control with conflict resolution. Transform conflict into governance goal; perfect existing laws and regulations, develop environmental public interest litigation system; do a good job of appeasing work from the material and spiritual levels, seriously punish those responsible; build conflict governance post-evaluation system, Prevent the recurrence of environmental conflict and provide reference for similar environmental conflict management.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：X321
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 赵闯;黄粹;;环境冲突与集群行为——环境群体性冲突的社会政治分析[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2014年05期
2 吴真;;环境冲突的协商解决机制分析[J];长白学刊;2014年04期
3 严燕;冯绪猛;;“环境冲突”的理论省察[J];甘肃理论学刊;2014年04期
4 张晓燕;;地方政府应对环境群体性事件的困境及对策[J];理论与现代化;2014年04期
5 严燕;刘祖云;;风险社会理论范式下中国“环境冲突”问题及其协同治理[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2014年03期
6 张良桥;;协调博弈理论研究新进展[J];经济前沿;2009年04期
7 于建嵘;;当前农村环境污染冲突的主要特征及对策[J];世界环境;2008年01期
8 吴真;;企业环境责任确立的正当性分析——以可持续发展理念为视角[J];当代法学;2007年05期
9 赵汀阳;博弈问题的哲学分析[J];北京行政学院学报;2005年03期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 张向和;垃圾处理场的邻避效应及其社会冲突解决机制的研究[D];重庆大学;2010年
2 李琼;冲突的构成及其边界[D];上海大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 史杰;环境群体性事件的治理模式转型[D];南京大学;2013年
2 匡武英;群体性事件问题研究[D];华中师范大学;2007年
，本文编号：2186630
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zhengzhijingjixuelunwen/2186630.html
