清代科举与历史教育研究
发布时间：2019-05-24 10:59
【摘要】：自先秦至明清，中国古代历史教育源远流长，至清代，这是中国古代历史教育的一个重要阶段，随着教育制度的完善和科举制度的兴盛，清代的历史教育经历了一个的蜿蜒曲折的发展过程，对清代乃至近代的政治、经济、文化都产生了深远影响。 本文以清代科举为视角研究清代的历史教育，由于历史教育具有资政、资治的特殊功用，因而受到了统治者的高度重视。史学知识也成为科举考试的重要内容，从清朝入关后实行科举选拨人才伊始直至科举制度的消亡，科举考试的内容和形式在清代也有一定变化，但对于史学知识的考试始终是重中之重。 本文共分为四个部分：引言部分阐述本课题的研究意义、研究现状、研究重难点以及研究方法等。第一章阐述清代科举制度的鼎盛与历史教育的发展，论述了清代科举发展的背景、清代官学的历史教育以及清代书院的历史教育。第二章阐述了清代科举考试的对于历史知识的考察内容。第三章阐述了清代科举制度背景下历史教育产生的影响。 我国自古以来重视历史教育，唐代史学家刘知几曾指出：“史之为用，其利甚博，乃生民之要务，为国家之要道。”当代著名思想家任继愈先生则坚持认为历史学乃是“国家兴亡之学，，民族盛衰之学”、“史学关系到国家的存亡”，把历史学上升到了关乎民族命运的高度，因而他主张要重视历史学和历史教育的工作。本文希望通过研究，能够为当今中国历史教育提供一些积极的借鉴。
[Abstract]:From the pre-Qin Dynasty to the Ming and Qing dynasties, the ancient Chinese history education has a long history, to the Qing Dynasty, this is an important stage of the ancient Chinese history education, with the improvement of the education system and the prosperity of the imperial examination system, History education in Qing Dynasty experienced a winding and tortuous process of development, which had a profound impact on politics, economy and culture in Qing Dynasty and even in modern times. This paper studies the history education of Qing Dynasty from the perspective of imperial examination in Qing Dynasty. Because history education has the special function of senior government and senior management, it has been attached great importance to by the rulers. The knowledge of historiography has also become an important part of the imperial examination. From the beginning of the imperial examination to the demise of the imperial examination system, the content and form of the imperial examination have also changed to a certain extent in the Qing Dynasty. However, the examination of historiography knowledge is always the most important. This paper is divided into four parts: the introduction part expounds the research significance, research status, research difficulties and research methods. The first chapter expounds the prosperity of imperial examination system and the development of historical education in Qing Dynasty, and discusses the background of the development of imperial examination in Qing Dynasty, the historical education of official studies in Qing Dynasty and the historical education of academies in Qing Dynasty. The second chapter expounds the historical knowledge of imperial examination in Qing Dynasty. The third chapter expounds the influence of history education under the background of imperial examination system in Qing Dynasty. Since ancient times, China has attached importance to history education. Liu Zhiji, a historian of Tang Dynasty, once pointed out: "the use of history is of great benefit, which is an important task for the people and an important way for the country." Mr. Ren Jiyu, a famous contemporary thinker, insisted that history is "the study of the rise and fall of the country and the rise and fall of the nation". "historiography is related to the survival of the country" and raised history to a height related to the fate of the nation. Therefore, he advocated that we should attach importance to the work of history and history education. This paper hopes that through the study, it can provide some positive reference for today's Chinese history education.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G633.51
本文编号：2484809
[Abstract]:From the pre-Qin Dynasty to the Ming and Qing dynasties, the ancient Chinese history education has a long history, to the Qing Dynasty, this is an important stage of the ancient Chinese history education, with the improvement of the education system and the prosperity of the imperial examination system, History education in Qing Dynasty experienced a winding and tortuous process of development, which had a profound impact on politics, economy and culture in Qing Dynasty and even in modern times. This paper studies the history education of Qing Dynasty from the perspective of imperial examination in Qing Dynasty. Because history education has the special function of senior government and senior management, it has been attached great importance to by the rulers. The knowledge of historiography has also become an important part of the imperial examination. From the beginning of the imperial examination to the demise of the imperial examination system, the content and form of the imperial examination have also changed to a certain extent in the Qing Dynasty. However, the examination of historiography knowledge is always the most important. This paper is divided into four parts: the introduction part expounds the research significance, research status, research difficulties and research methods. The first chapter expounds the prosperity of imperial examination system and the development of historical education in Qing Dynasty, and discusses the background of the development of imperial examination in Qing Dynasty, the historical education of official studies in Qing Dynasty and the historical education of academies in Qing Dynasty. The second chapter expounds the historical knowledge of imperial examination in Qing Dynasty. The third chapter expounds the influence of history education under the background of imperial examination system in Qing Dynasty. Since ancient times, China has attached importance to history education. Liu Zhiji, a historian of Tang Dynasty, once pointed out: "the use of history is of great benefit, which is an important task for the people and an important way for the country." Mr. Ren Jiyu, a famous contemporary thinker, insisted that history is "the study of the rise and fall of the country and the rise and fall of the nation". "historiography is related to the survival of the country" and raised history to a height related to the fate of the nation. Therefore, he advocated that we should attach importance to the work of history and history education. This paper hopes that through the study, it can provide some positive reference for today's Chinese history education.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G633.51
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 余永德;;略论我国古代书院的教学特点[J];安徽师大学报(哲学社会科学版);1986年01期
2 邢铁;;唐宋科举制度下的家学传承——以史学和技艺为中心[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2009年01期
3 顾志华;;试论全祖望在历史文献学上的成就[J];华中师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1986年01期
4 梁励;中国古代历史教育特点探析[J];南京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2002年03期
5 卢钟锋;论《宋元学案》的编纂、体例特点和历史地位[J];史学史研究;1986年02期
6 李良玉;;唐代科举与历史教育[J];史学史研究;2006年04期
7 苏寿桐;中国古代历史教育初探[J];中国教育学刊;1994年01期
本文编号：2484809
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zhengzhijingjixuelunwen/2484809.html
