技术意识形态化及其扬弃路径研究
发布时间：2019-06-15 05:11
【摘要】：对技术意识形态化的研究虽然兴起于西方学者对资本主义科学技术双重功能的批判,但技术意识形态化并不是资本主义社会的特有现象,它在任何一个阶级社会都有可能产生。在前资本主义的阶级社会中,技术在有限的范围内发生作用,对社会无法产生重大影响,技术的意识形态化并不明显;而在资本主义时代,技术的意识形态出场方式发生了根本的变化,技术开始影响和规范政治、经济、文化等一切生活领域,技术意识形态化才开始逐渐被人们所认识。技术的主体意向性使技术意识形态化成为可能,技术的意识形态化表现在技术在被特定阶级或集团制定和运用时,必然反映特定阶级的世界观和特定社会的政治经济形式,而于此同时技术的存在和发展也需要特定的意识形态环境来维持。技术意识形态化是人类理性分裂和阶级统治的必然结果,它一方面促进了社会合理化的发展,另一方面也造成了人类的生存危机。西方学者在解决这一悖论时朝着重建完整的理性方向发展,唯独马克思找到了变革生产方式这一根本路径。我国社会主义现代化建设要坚持“科学技术是第一生产力”的思想,以人为本,大力发展高新技术,根据发展的需要引进国外先进技术和资本,但我们不可能同时吸收技术所带来的西方价值观和道德观,只能根据我国社会主义主流意识形态对技术进行改造和应用。技术意识形态化是技术发展到阶级社会的产物,技术的本质是人的本质的外化,在共产主义社会中,消灭了阶级统治,实现了人的全面自由发展,技术意识形态将会彻底的扬弃。本文绪论主要介绍了本文选题的意义、国内外研究现状、研究目的和研究方法;第一章是技术意识形态化的界定,对技术和意识形态关系研究的理论基础、技术的存在论差异、意识形态的历史演变、技术的意识形态两个维度进行了探讨;第二章分析了技术意识形态化形成的原因、技术意识形态化的合理性限度以及西方现代哲学破解技术意识形态的代表性方案;第三章描述了技术意识形态化的扬弃路径,在社会主义主流意识形态的引导下,以人的自由全面发展为目的发展和控制技术,共产主义是积极扬弃技术意识形态的现实活动。
[Abstract]:Although the study of technological ideology arises from the criticism of the dual functions of capitalist science and technology by western scholars, technological idealization is not a unique phenomenon in capitalist society, and it may occur in any class society. In the class society of pre-capitalism, technology plays an important role in a limited range, which can not have a great impact on the society, and the ideological appearance of technology is not obvious. In the capitalist era, the ideological appearance of technology has undergone fundamental changes, and technology began to influence and regulate all fields of life, such as politics, economy, culture and so on, and technological ideology began to be gradually recognized by people. The subjective intentionality of technology makes it possible to make technological ideology possible. The ideology of technology is manifested in the fact that when technology is formulated and applied by a specific class or group, it must reflect the world outlook of a specific class and the political and economic form of a specific society. At the same time, the existence and development of technology also need a specific ideological environment to maintain. Technological ideology is the inevitable result of the rational division and class rule of human beings. On the one hand, it promotes the development of social rationalization, on the other hand, it also causes the survival crisis of human beings. In solving this paradox, western scholars are developing towards rebuilding the complete rational direction, only Marx has found the fundamental path of changing the mode of production. China's socialist modernization construction should adhere to the idea that "science and technology is the primary productive force", people-oriented, vigorously develop high and new technology, and introduce foreign advanced technology and capital according to the needs of development, but we can not absorb the western values and morality brought about by technology at the same time, and can only transform and apply technology according to the mainstream socialist ideology of our country. Technological ideology is the product of the development of technology to class society, and the essence of technology is the externalization of human nature. In the communist society, the class rule has been eliminated and the all-round and free development of human beings has been realized, and the technological ideology will be completely abandoned. The introduction of this paper mainly introduces the significance of this topic, the research status at home and abroad, research purpose and research methods. The first chapter is the definition of technology ideology, the theoretical basis of the relationship between technology and ideology, the difference of technology ontology, the historical evolution of ideology, and the ideology of technology. The second chapter analyzes the reasons for the formation of technological ideology, the reasonable limit of technological ideology and the representative scheme of western modern philosophy to crack technological ideology; the third chapter describes the sublimation path of technological ideology, under the guidance of socialist mainstream ideology, develops and controls technology for the purpose of free and all-round development of human beings, and communism is a realistic activity to actively discard technological ideology.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：N02
本文编号：2499986
[Abstract]:Although the study of technological ideology arises from the criticism of the dual functions of capitalist science and technology by western scholars, technological idealization is not a unique phenomenon in capitalist society, and it may occur in any class society. In the class society of pre-capitalism, technology plays an important role in a limited range, which can not have a great impact on the society, and the ideological appearance of technology is not obvious. In the capitalist era, the ideological appearance of technology has undergone fundamental changes, and technology began to influence and regulate all fields of life, such as politics, economy, culture and so on, and technological ideology began to be gradually recognized by people. The subjective intentionality of technology makes it possible to make technological ideology possible. The ideology of technology is manifested in the fact that when technology is formulated and applied by a specific class or group, it must reflect the world outlook of a specific class and the political and economic form of a specific society. At the same time, the existence and development of technology also need a specific ideological environment to maintain. Technological ideology is the inevitable result of the rational division and class rule of human beings. On the one hand, it promotes the development of social rationalization, on the other hand, it also causes the survival crisis of human beings. In solving this paradox, western scholars are developing towards rebuilding the complete rational direction, only Marx has found the fundamental path of changing the mode of production. China's socialist modernization construction should adhere to the idea that "science and technology is the primary productive force", people-oriented, vigorously develop high and new technology, and introduce foreign advanced technology and capital according to the needs of development, but we can not absorb the western values and morality brought about by technology at the same time, and can only transform and apply technology according to the mainstream socialist ideology of our country. Technological ideology is the product of the development of technology to class society, and the essence of technology is the externalization of human nature. In the communist society, the class rule has been eliminated and the all-round and free development of human beings has been realized, and the technological ideology will be completely abandoned. The introduction of this paper mainly introduces the significance of this topic, the research status at home and abroad, research purpose and research methods. The first chapter is the definition of technology ideology, the theoretical basis of the relationship between technology and ideology, the difference of technology ontology, the historical evolution of ideology, and the ideology of technology. The second chapter analyzes the reasons for the formation of technological ideology, the reasonable limit of technological ideology and the representative scheme of western modern philosophy to crack technological ideology; the third chapter describes the sublimation path of technological ideology, under the guidance of socialist mainstream ideology, develops and controls technology for the purpose of free and all-round development of human beings, and communism is a realistic activity to actively discard technological ideology.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：N02
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前6条
1 易锋;分歧与共识：理论界如何面对[N];中国财经报;2006年
2 黄东黎;运用WTO法律机制 解决中美贸易摩擦[N];法制日报;2005年
3 ;以理性思维看待中医[N];健康报;2006年
4 杨雪冬;科学发展观下的政府创新[N];中国社会报;2009年
5 本报记者 夜谭;学术代沟是这样形成的[N];社会科学报;2003年
6 林贤治;历史是不同于历史学的[N];大众科技报;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 杨安;技术意识形态化及其扬弃路径研究[D];华南理工大学;2016年
2 周善和;技术意识形态化的局限和扬弃路径选择[D];中共广东省委党校;2012年
3 黄龙海;论意识形态化的信息传播[D];新疆大学;2012年
，本文编号：2499986
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zhengzhijingjixuelunwen/2499986.html
