当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 安全工程论文 >

基于绩效棱柱的道路运输企业安全指标体系研究

发布时间:2018-05-13 22:36

  本文选题:道路运输企业 + 安全指标体系 ; 参考:《江南大学》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:近年来,我国重(特)大交通事故频繁发生,道路运输安全生产形势日趋严峻。对道路运输企业开展安全研究是一项紧迫而又具有重大意义的研究课题。由于传统的道路运输企业安全研究缺乏科学的指标分析工具而导致指标与战略之间没有承接,缺乏逻辑性。文章首次将绩效棱柱理论引入道路运输安全领域,运用其严密的逻辑和弹性的框架,结合道路运输企业安全管理的特殊性,尝试性地将指标确立的重点放在企业内部的安全战略、安全流程和安全能力维度上,确立道路运输企业三个纵向维度下的安全因素。另一方面,在对重大交通事故原因、交通政策分析的基础上,借鉴其它行业安全因素,得出道路运输企业中的驾驶员、车辆、综合管理三个横向层面下影响运输安全的重要因素。将横向、纵向因素结合初步设计出二维安全指标集,,该指标集包含33个底层指标。通过118份问卷调查,运用SPSS因子分析对其验证,结果表明33个底层指标纵向维度相关性高可以保留,且横向层面相关性由驾驶员、车辆、综合管理三个层面分解为驾驶员、车辆、风险管理和日常安全管理四个层面。文章最终确立了四个横向层面与三个纵向维度相结合的道路运输企业安全指标集。通过第二轮专家问卷调查,请10位专家对指标、维度和层面分别进行权重对比打分,运用层次分析法计算得出驾驶员层面权重占48.7%,车辆层面权重占22.9%,风险管理层面权重占18.0%,日常管理层面权重占10.3%;战略权重49.3%,流程31.2%,能力19.6%;得出一套科学规范且可行性强的道路运输企业安全指标体系。笔者构建的道路运输企业安全指标体系不仅能够作为企业驾驶员部门、车辆管理部门、综合管理部门和风险管理部门的横向安全指标,也能为企业提供从高层管理到基层运营的纵向考评指标。克服了传统道路运输企业安全指标的单一性和缺乏关联性的问题,对企业安全生产管理具有一定的指导意义和应用价值。
[Abstract]:In recent years, heavy traffic accidents occur frequently in China, and the situation of road transportation safety is becoming more and more serious. It is an urgent and significant research topic for road transportation enterprises to carry out safety research. Because the traditional road transportation enterprise safety research lacks the scientific index analysis tool, resulting in the index and the strategy does not undertake, lacks the logic. This paper introduces the performance prism theory into the field of road transport safety for the first time, applies its strict logic and elastic framework, and combines the particularity of road transport enterprise safety management. This paper tries to lay emphasis on the internal safety strategy, safety process and safety capability of the enterprise, and establish the safety factors under the three vertical dimensions of road transport enterprises. On the other hand, on the basis of analyzing the causes of major traffic accidents and traffic policies, and drawing lessons from the safety factors of other industries, it is concluded that drivers and vehicles in road transport enterprises, Integrated management of three horizontal levels of transport safety under the important factors. The two-dimensional safety index set is designed by combining the horizontal and longitudinal factors. The index set consists of 33 underlying indexes. SPSS factor analysis was used to verify the results of 118 questionnaires. The results showed that the high correlation of the longitudinal dimension of 33 bottom indicators could be maintained, and the horizontal correlation was decomposed into driver, vehicle and integrated management from three levels, the driver, the vehicle and the comprehensive management. Vehicle, risk management and daily safety management four levels. Finally, the paper establishes the road transport enterprise safety index set which combines four horizontal levels and three vertical dimensions. Through the second round of expert questionnaires, 10 experts were asked to compare the weights of indicators, dimensions and levels. The weight of driver level is 48.7%, vehicle level is 22.9%, risk management level is 18.0, daily management level is 10.3; strategic weight is 49.3%, process is 31.2, ability is 19.6b; and a set of scientific norms is feasible. Strong road transportation enterprise safety index system. The road transportation enterprise safety index system constructed by the author can not only be used as the horizontal safety index of the driver department, the vehicle management department, the comprehensive management department and the risk management department of the enterprise. Can also provide for enterprises from top management to grass-roots operation of vertical evaluation indicators. It overcomes the problems of the singularity and lack of relevance of the traditional road transportation enterprise safety index, and has certain guiding significance and application value for the enterprise safety production management.
【学位授予单位】:江南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:U492.8;F512.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 朱玉媛;牟凯旋;;面向公众需求的档案服务绩效评估——基于绩效棱柱的评估模型构建与运行[J];档案管理;2011年04期

2 李尽法;许正中;;绩效棱柱在新绩效预算中的应用分析[J];中国农机化;2009年01期

3 祝昭,郭洁;道路运输市场管理体制面临的问题与对策[J];公路交通科技;2005年04期

4 董正亮;王方宁;郭启明;景国勋;张军波;张永全;;以平衡记分卡为中心构建安全绩效管理系统[J];工业安全与环保;2007年11期

5 孟祥英;辛国军;;试论绩效棱柱与作业基础预算的结合[J];会计之友(下旬刊);2009年05期

6 王丽华;俞金国;;城市旅游地旅游安全评价指标体系研究[J];安全与环境工程;2010年02期

7 刘清;曹斌;;高速公路交通安全评价指标体系的建立[J];武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版);2005年06期

8 常建娥;蒋太立;;层次分析法确定权重的研究[J];武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版);2007年01期

9 李柯;张胜;;空中交通管理中心安全预警管理信息系统研究[J];武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版);2007年08期

10 刘兴太;杨震;程洪海;李宏伟;马勇;何冰;王奕飞;;层次分析法判断矩阵在确定科研绩效评价指标权重系数中的应用[J];中国科技信息;2008年19期



本文编号:1885147

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/anquangongcheng/1885147.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a3386***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com