“公”车出行——南京市鼓楼区公务自行车运营分析与思考

发布时间：2018-03-04 06:13

本文选题：机动性　切入点：公车改革　出处：《现代城市研究》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：机动性与可达性是城市交通规划与设计的两个重要方面。通常,我们将人们利用各种交通方式出行的权力及便利性称为机动性,此前,我们常关注通勤机动性(如BRT)、商务机动性(如购物班车)和弱势群体机动性(如残疾人出行),但往往忽视了机动性的另一个重要方面——公务机动性。"公务自行车"因涉及绿色出行,同时又涵盖公车改革和降低"三公经费"等老百姓非常关注的问题,在社会上引发热议。论文为探究该公务出行新方式的可行性,以南京市鼓楼区政府的公务自行车为研究对象,对公务人员和普通市民分别进行了问卷调查和访谈,对公务出行行为进行了随车调查和出行模拟,并在此基础上从出行效率、出行成本和碳排放3个方面对比了公务汽车和公务自行车两种出行方式。调查分析结果充分肯定了公务自行车的可行性和合理性,但同时也暴露出了一些问题。为了更好地推广公务自行车这种合理可行的公务出行方式,并尽可能将其优点放大,进而从公共政策调整、规划设计优化和社会观念引导3个角度提出改进建议。
[Abstract]:Mobility and accessibility are two important aspects of urban traffic planning and design. We often focus on commuting mobility (such as BRTT, business mobility, such as shopping shuttle) and vulnerable groups, such as people with disabilities, but often ignore another important aspect of mobility-official mobility. " "because it involves green travel, At the same time, it also covers such issues as bus reform and the reduction of "three public funds" and other issues that people are very concerned about, which has aroused heated discussion in the society. In order to explore the feasibility of the new way of official travel, Taking the official bicycle of the government of Gulou District in Nanjing as the research object, the paper carries out a questionnaire survey and interview to the public servants and ordinary citizens, carries on the investigation and the travel simulation to the official travel behavior, and on this basis carries on the traveling efficiency. Travel costs and carbon emissions are compared between official vehicles and official bicycles. The results of investigation and analysis fully confirm the feasibility and rationality of official bicycles. But it also exposed some problems. In order to better promote official bicycle as a reasonable and feasible mode of business travel, and maximize its advantages as far as possible, and then adjust public policy, Suggestions for improvement are put forward from three angles of planning and design optimization and social concept guidance.
【作者单位】：上海天华城市规划设计有限公司;南京大学建筑与城市规划学院;江苏省城市综合交通专业委员会;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金(编号:51308281)
【分类号】：U491.225

【相似文献】