不同测试方法下碎石土、黄土路基模量对比研究
[Abstract]:The subgrade is the important foundation of the pavement structure, it supports the pavement structure and all the loads on it. The bearing capacity of the roadbed directly determines the overall performance of the highway, and the quality of the subgrade will affect the performance of the pavement structure. Occurrence and extent of disease. Many kinds of pavement diseases often occur in the process of highway use, and most of these diseases are caused by insufficient roadbed strength. Therefore, the solid and stable subgrade is the key to ensure the overall good performance of the pavement and ensure the transportation safety. As an important index of highway roadbed design, construction control and acceptance inspection, the modulus of resilience can make an accurate evaluation on the quality and performance of roadbed. However, the modulus of resilience is affected by many factors, such as soil quality, water content, compaction degree, etc. It is difficult to determine its value, especially the modulus of resilience of special soil subgrade, which is not recommended in the code. In addition, the detection methods used in the actual detection will be different, which causes confusion for the unity of the results. Therefore, it is necessary to study the resilience modulus of special soil subgrade, and compare and analyze the test results of common testing methods, and draw the conclusions of their applicability and accuracy. In this paper, the influence of water content and compaction on the modulus of resilience is analyzed. Taking a highway in Shaanxi as the research carrier, the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) is used to detect the gravel and loess subgrade. The results are compared with those measured by bearing plate method and Beckman beam method. Different regression models are established and the correlation analysis of the corresponding indexes is carried out. The conversion relationship between the different detection indexes is obtained by regression equation. The results show that the changes of the measured modulus of the three detection methods are consistent to a certain extent. Can make the accurate appraisal to the roadbed performance objectively. Based on the actual situation of the project, FWD, bearing plate and Beckman beam are used to detect the same site of gravel subgrade and loess subgrade, which proves the quality of the roadbed filled with this kind of gravel soil. The performance is much better than the loess subgrade. Through simple economic comparison, although gravel soil is used as filling material for roadbed, the construction cost is slightly higher than that of loess, but the quality of roadbed is obviously enhanced, which ensures the use function of highway to a greater extent and prolongs the service life. The maintenance frequency and cost of the later period are reduced.
【学位授予单位】:长安大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:U416.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贺国佑;刘锋民;;新疆地区路基回弹模量E_0研究[J];中外公路;2008年02期
2 刘大鹏;王婧;;路基回弹模量对路面结构层受力的影响分析[J];路基工程;2008年01期
3 徐平;蔡迎春;陈忠平;王复明;;FWD和BB在路基检测中的对比分析[J];公路;2007年10期
4 李平;袁翔;查旭东;周育才;曾志伟;;便携式公路路基动态弯沉仪系统设计与研究[J];中外公路;2007年03期
5 张世洲;凌建明;罗志刚;;国外未处治粒料与路基土回弹模量试验研究——基本原理与试验方法[J];公路;2006年11期
6 李荣,张贤康;公路路面弯沉值动态检测技术的新发展——WCX-21路面弯沉自动检测系统的特点和应用[J];交通标准化;2004年10期
7 韩森,华锋,陈忠明,孟庆营,王新明,彭帝;风积砂路基回弹模量研究[J];公路;2004年07期
8 卢明康,顾小安,滕玉明,石名磊;浅层面波测试应用于高速公路路基检测[J];重庆交通学院学报;2004年03期
9 丁立,刘有录,关惠平;老堆积黄土类路基土回弹模量的室内试验研究[J];兰州交通大学学报;2004年01期
10 邓觐宇;高速公路红砂岩的路用性能及施工工艺研究[J];岩土工程技术;2003年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 石鸿;公路土基回弹模量测试方法及推荐值研究[D];长安大学;2005年
2 王俊梅;土基回弹模量及其测试方法研究[D];长安大学;2004年
3 段丹军;路基回弹模量的快速检测[D];长沙理工大学;2004年
4 孙建兵;土基模量的非线性反演分析及其应用研究[D];郑州大学;2002年
5 李强;路基路面检测技术与质量控制[D];长安大学;2002年
6 宋焕宇;路面弯沉检测方法相关性的研究[D];大连理工大学;2001年
,本文编号:2154504
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/2154504.html