多跨曲线连续刚构桥地震反应分析
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of highway traffic in the western region of China, a large number of control projects - bridges have been built on high grade highways in mountain areas. The curved bridges can overcome the terrain constraints of the mountain areas well, comply with the overall design requirements of the route, and thus promote the rapid development of the curved rigid frame bridge. Since 1971, San Fernando (San Fernan, USA) Do) after the earthquake, the seismic study of the curved beam bridge started to the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008, and the curve bridges were still subjected to different degrees of earthquake damage. It shows that the scholars at home and abroad are difficult to study the seismic response analysis and seismic performance of the curved bridges, and the law of understanding is insufficient. The curved continuous rigid frame bridge is the engineering background. The dynamic characteristic analysis, the response spectrum analysis and the dynamic time history analysis of the pile soil interaction are established by Midas Civil software. The specific research contents and the conclusions are as follows: (1) the two models of the continuous rigid frame bridge are established by using Midas Civil finite element soft parts. The modal analysis of the bottom consolidation model and the pile soil effect model is carried out and the dynamic characteristics of the two models are compared and the results show that the first order mode period increases by 69.03% after considering the interaction of pile and soil, and the period of the high order mode is corresponding to the consolidation model of the bottom of the pier with the increase of the order of vibration. The cycle gradually approaches, and the ten order self vibration period increases only 6.43%., which indicates that in the soft soil foundation, the pile foundation increases the self vibration period of the structure, but has little effect on the high order mode period. (2) the horizontal bi-directional response spectrum analysis of the curved rigid frame bridge is carried out under the E1 earthquake, and the maximum seismic response is obtained to determine the most unfavorable ground motion level. In the direction of input, the response spectrum analysis and dynamic time history analysis of the pier bottom consolidation model and the pile soil effect model are carried out. It is concluded that the seismic response of the bridge structure is larger than that of the clockwise bridge after the pile soil effect is considered, and the effect of the vertical ground motion can be ignored when the seismic performance of the continuous rigid frame bridge is analyzed; the seismic action can be ignored. The calculation results of the dynamic time history method are not less than 80% of the calculation results of the response spectrum method, which conforms to the newly promulgated regulations for the seismic design of highway bridges. (3) the design of three kinds of bridge piers, namely the original bridge rectangular solid piers, the two limb thin-walled solid piers and the inner octagonal hollow piers, is analyzed. The results show that the two limb thin-walled hollow piers are adopted. In addition to the increase of the internal force of the bridge to the 1# pier, the other piers are obviously reduced, while the internal forces of the transverse bridge to all the piers have little change, and the displacement is greatly increased. The bending moment and shear force of the inner octagonal hollow piers are smaller than the rectangular solid piers, but the displacement of the pier top is only slightly increased; the two limb thin wall solid piers are compared to the pier top and the bottom of the pier. It is suggested that the original rectangular solid pier should be replaced by the inner octagonal hollow pier, which has better seismic performance.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:U442.55;U448.23
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 崔光耀;伍修刚;王明年;林国进;;汶川8.0级大地震公路隧道震害调查与震害特征[J];现代隧道技术;2017年02期
2 齐秀廷;姚永春;;高墩连续刚构桥地震响应影响因素分析[J];铁道科学与工程学报;2017年01期
3 郑晓龙;鄢勇;樊启武;;考虑桥墩温差效应的车桥动力分析研究[J];铁道工程学报;2015年08期
4 YIN Xiao;WU Di;;Seismic analysis of long-span continuous rigid frame bridges in cold regions:a case study of Bridge 1 in north of international tourism resort in Changbai Mountain[J];Global Geology;2015年02期
5 娄锋;;大跨斜拉桥多点反应谱法地震响应分析[J];世界地震工程;2015年02期
6 宋飞;李建中;管仲国;;汶川地震百花大桥震害分析[J];振动与冲击;2015年08期
7 陈亮;任伟新;张广锋;左小晗;黄勇;;基于性能的桥梁抗震设计中考虑持时的实际地震波优化选择方法[J];振动与冲击;2015年03期
8 崔光耀;刘维东;倪嵩陟;王明年;林国进;;汶川地震各地震烈度区公路隧道震害特征研究[J];现代隧道技术;2014年06期
9 卢斌;王凯华;李高超;贺拴海;;设计参数对空腹式连续刚构桥关键截面内力的影响[J];公路交通科技;2014年12期
10 杜修力;韩强;;桥梁抗震研究若干进展[J];地震工程与工程振动;2014年04期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 卢斌;空腹式连续刚构桥静动力学特性[D];长安大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 曾德益;山区高边中跨比连续刚构桥悬臂施工设计优化研究[D];重庆交通大学;2015年
2 徐超;大跨高墩连续刚构桥桥墩结构型式研究[D];重庆交通大学;2014年
3 刘江龙;高墩大跨刚构桥抗震性能研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2014年
4 徐小童;大跨径高墩连续刚构桥悬臂施工过程中地震响应研究[D];重庆交通大学;2013年
5 谢陈贵;高速铁路大跨不对称连续刚构桥施工控制及风致稳定性研究[D];中南大学;2013年
6 崔同松;大跨径斜拉—刚构组合体系桥地震响应分析[D];长安大学;2013年
7 侯鹏飞;高墩大跨度连续刚构桥梁结构抗震性能研究[D];中南大学;2010年
8 黄庆伟;高墩大跨曲线连续刚构桥非线性地震反应分析[D];西南交通大学;2004年
9 牛俊武;桥跨结构设计参数对高墩连续刚构桥抗震性能影响分析[D];长安大学;2004年
,本文编号:2166684
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/2166684.html