公交时空路权综合优先效果多情景仿真与评估
[Abstract]:Urban public transport has the advantages of intensive efficiency, energy saving and environmental protection. Priority to develop public transportation has become an important strategy in our country, and the priority of public transport right is an important grasp and powerful guarantee of public transport priority. At present, there are some engineering practice cases in our country, but there is a general lack of evaluation of priority effect level, so the implementation effect is poor, and the service level of public transportation can not be really improved. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the implementation effect of the comprehensive priority of bus traffic right in time and space by using multi-scenario simulation system, and to summarize the evaluation method of the priority effect of bus traffic right. In this paper, first of all, a field investigation is carried out on the road sections without bus lanes. The intersection of Changjiang Road and Zhujiang Road, Zhongshan Road and Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, is selected to obtain the local speed and traffic volume data of peak hours. The foundation of subsequent simulation modeling is obtained. Then the data obtained are analyzed preliminarily, and the current traffic operation condition is obtained, which is used as the original control of the priority effect of road rights. Through theoretical preparation, this paper introduces the characteristics of the bus lanes outside the road and the inner side of the road, and gives three signal control modes, namely, no signal priority, traditional signal priority and preemptive signal priority. The aim is to provide primordial contrast while enriching the time-based right-of-way approach. This paper designs six kinds of space-time road rights comprehensive priority scenarios by way combination, which embodies the characteristics of comprehensive priority, in order to find out the best combination mode through multi-scenario test. The second development of VISSIM signal control module is carried out by using VISSIM_COM interface, so that six test scenarios can be realized in VISSIM. From the point of view of bus, social vehicle and passenger, the evaluation index is given, including the average delay of bus, the average delay and the average number of times of stopping, the delay of vehicle, the average delay of stopping and the travel time per person. Thus, the priority effect can be fully reflected. The research results show that providing priority to road rights can bring about significant positive benefits. After the bus lane is set up, because the bus and the social vehicle go their own way, the interference of the bus is reduced, and the delay of the bus is greatly reduced, which fully reflects the basic position and the important role of the bus lane. Because of the large left-turn traffic in this case, it is better to set the outside bus lane. After giving priority to the time right, the operation efficiency of the bus will be further improved, which reflects the effect of signal priority. On the premise of the outside and the inside of the road, the traditional signal priority reduces the average delay of bus by 4% and 2%, and the priority of providing the presentiment signal reduces by 33% and 20%. Under the two priority control modes, the added value of social vehicle delay is controlled within 15%. From the point of view of per capita travel time, in this case, under the collected flow rate, in six test scenarios, it is the best to set up a special lane outside the road and provide a presentiment signal to give priority to the per capita travel time, which can make the per capita travel time minimum. That is, to find out the best combination. Different from the traditional research idea of single road right, the method proposed in this paper can effectively guide the establishment of bus traffic right priority, and provide the basis for engineering practice. It has a good application prospect.
【学位授予单位】:东南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:U491.17
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘兰英;什么是路权?[J];汽车运用;2004年05期
2 于泉;杨永勤;任福田;;交通工程中路权的分析研究[J];道路交通与安全;2006年02期
3 廖军;;对向刮擦事故中“路权”的确定[J];道路交通管理;2007年11期
4 黄世旺;陆琪;杨涛;陈阳;;中山陵风景区路权管制的研究[J];森林工程;2008年05期
5 徐斯逵;马社强;;道路交通事故责任认定“路权理论”的商榷[J];中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版);2010年04期
6 徐精华;张卫星;邹申;;关于路权和路权的限制[J];交通与运输(学术版);2011年02期
7 裴保纯;浅谈路权的特征及作用[J];现代交通管理;1997年05期
8 杨朝晖;也谈路权——兼与裴保纯同志商榷[J];现代交通管理;1998年01期
9 金凡;;路权与公交路权优先[J];建设科技;2007年09期
10 王路宪;;南京公交车装探头维护专用路权[J];城市公共交通;2009年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 李进胜;哈尔滨重拳整治无路权车辆[N];人民公安报;2007年
2 市人大代表 王士奇邋王蕴书 梁国伦 马素丽;把住车辆转籍关取缔无路权车[N];哈尔滨日报;2007年
3 张宝峰;构建交通文明重在合理分配路权[N];洛阳日报;2010年
4 秦雷;阿城警方集中公开销毁342辆无路权车[N];人民公安报·交通安全周刊;2009年
5 本报记者 王艺;我的“路权”,谁来管?[N];大连日报;2012年
6 本报评论员 李富永;中国路权分配为何偏向机动车[N];中华工商时报;2012年
7 庾向荣;优先路权不是“剐蹭”出来的[N];法制日报;2012年
8 梁发芾;马路文明与路权公平[N];甘肃日报;2013年
9 山西省社会科学院党的建设与政治法学研究所所长 郅润明;路权 破解行人和非机动车出行难[N];山西日报;2014年
10 郭毅;整治无路权车重点整治“有权人”[N];法制日报;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 刘倩;基于时间依赖型交易性路权的用户路径选择研究[D];兰州交通大学;2015年
2 陈云骥;公交时空路权综合优先效果多情景仿真与评估[D];东南大学;2015年
3 邹申;道路交通法中的路权原则[D];复旦大学;2010年
4 王树威;中日满蒙路权问题探析[D];延边大学;2013年
,本文编号:2243633
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/2243633.html