城际旅客综合运输服务水平评价指标选择研究
[Abstract]:With the completion of the comprehensive transportation system construction in China, the focus of the comprehensive transportation construction in the 13th Five-Year Plan period has been transferred to the integrated transportation service which can reasonably allocate the comprehensive transportation resources and improve the travel quality and efficiency. Integrated transport service is the trend of future development. In the process of the development of integrated transportation service, it is very important and very basic to evaluate the level of integrated transportation service and provide the decision basis for service improvement and optimization. When evaluating the level of integrated transport services, the selection of indicators is fundamental and essential. At this stage, most of the evaluation indicators are selected from the point of view of supply to evaluate the coordination and connection level of various transport modes infrastructure in the construction of comprehensive transport system. The leading role of passenger travel demand in comprehensive passenger transport service is not given enough attention. Therefore, this paper starts from the passenger demand, takes intercity passenger travel as the research object, and clarifies the services that passengers need in each link of inter-city travel. Then the qualitative and quantitative methods are used to select the index system which can reflect the passenger service level. Based on the analysis and study of the current situation at home and abroad, this paper applies the theory of system analysis to the intercity passenger transport service level as the research object. The intercity passenger travel process is divided into three travel stages of "intercity transportation". Starting from the inter-city passenger travel decision-making process, this paper summarizes the factors that affect the passenger travel decision, and clarifies the different needs of the intercity passenger travel process, and divides the inter-city passenger travel service into information service, ticket service. In the four aspects of travel service and whole process perception, 24 indexes which can reflect the degree of transportation demand satisfaction are selected, and the primary index system is established, and the quantitative index is calculated according to the actual situation. Then the principal component analysis (PCA) is used to eliminate the information overlapping index. The weight of each index is determined, which is used as the reference sequence of grey relational analysis method. The correlation degree is calculated, and the index with high correlation degree is selected as an important index. Finally, 24 intercity passenger travel chains composed of different transportation modes are randomly selected from "Xi'an-Beijing". Combined with actual data, the important index set {punctual rate, convenience for purchasing tickets, passage transfer time, and purchase times are selected. Passenger satisfaction, information accuracy, running time, transfer times}. The selected indicators can comprehensively reflect whether the intercity travel process is convenient and efficient, and whether the various transportation modes are connected smoothly, which proves the rationality and practicability of the index selection.
【学位授予单位】:长安大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:U125
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴群琪;董彬;宋京妮;;综合运输的本质及其特征研究[J];技术经济与管理研究;2016年11期
2 鲍学英;李海连;王起才;;基于灰色关联分析和主成分分析组合权重的确定方法研究[J];数学的实践与认识;2016年09期
3 孙启鹏;郑晓静;;服务水平—运行效率—资源消耗传导下的通道交通方式选择模型[J];交通运输系统工程与信息;2016年01期
4 赵光辉;李莲莲;单丽辉;;综合运输服务:互联网与大数据应用评价[J];综合运输;2015年09期
5 杨雪英;赵新惠;廖倩如;;综合运输示范区评价指标体系设计研究[J];综合运输;2015年09期
6 郭根材;聂磊;;瑞士铁路旅客运输组织分析及启示[J];综合运输;2015年03期
7 孙启鹏;高怡;马飞;陈文强;许东东;;基于LEAP和综合集成赋权的城市低碳交通政策选择方法[J];中国公路学报;2014年08期
8 孔哲;孙相军;;综合运输规划评价指标体系研究[J];综合运输;2013年07期
9 周志国;徐为人;;快速公交系统应用评价方法研究[J];装备制造技术;2013年01期
10 姜波;;多元统计分析方法在实际问题中的应用[J];德州学院学报;2012年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 杨金云;通道交通方式服务水平的用户感知[D];长安大学;2016年
2 王龙辉;城乡公交客运服务质量评价体系研究[D];长安大学;2013年
3 延斐;基于高速铁路的旅客联合运输系统服务水平评估[D];北京交通大学;2012年
4 高燕;城市群城际交通系统发展评价研究[D];长安大学;2009年
5 黄璇;铁路与航空旅客联合运输可行性研究[D];同济大学;2008年
6 金宝辉;交通出行行为分析[D];西南交通大学;2004年
,本文编号:2251113
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/2251113.html