近断层地震动作用下钢筋混凝土桥墩易损性评价
[Abstract]:Compared with far field ground motion, near-fault ground motion has obvious velocity pulse band and strong vertical ground motion, which results in serious earthquake damage of bridge structure. In order to reasonably evaluate the seismic vulnerability of typical reinforced concrete pier used in near-fault seismic action, this paper takes the reinforced concrete pier of a common highway in China as the research object, based on the OpenSees seismic analysis software. Considering the uncertainty of material strength, 13 models of reinforced concrete pier are established by Latin hypercube sampling. Random and 13 near-fault seismic records with obvious velocity pulses selected from the PEER seismic database are combined to form a sample of "ground motion and bridge pier". Firstly, the damage parameters such as displacement ductility coefficient, curvature ductility coefficient and displacement angle are determined under the condition of intact, basic intact, slight damage, moderate damage and serious damage. Then eight far-field ground motions are selected to carry out nonlinear time-history analysis of bridge piers, and the pier responses under small, moderate and large earthquakes are calculated, respectively, and compared with the results of near-fault ground earthquake. The results show that the pier damage caused by near-fault earthquake is obviously greater than that of far-field ground motion, and the incremental dynamic analysis of 13 analysis samples under the combined action of horizontal and vertical ground motion is carried out. The peak value of vertical ground motion and the peak value of horizontal ground motion increase according to the equal proportion. The ductility coefficient of pier top displacement, the ductility coefficient of low controlled section curvature of pier and the vulnerable curve of displacement angle are established. It is compared with the vulnerability curve under the action of far-field ground motion. The results show that the reinforced concrete pier used in near-fault seismic action presents a more severe seismic response than that under the action of far-field ground motion. The main contents of this paper are as follows: (1) the damage parameters of the selected model under different damage states are determined, and the horizontal displacement of the pier top is selected in this paper. The curvature and displacement angle of the control section at the bottom of the pier are used to describe the damage parameters of the pier under the action of ground motion, such as intact, basic intact, slight damage, moderate failure and collapse. The values of the above three damage parameters in different failure states are determined by static elastic-plastic nappe analysis and correlation statistical results. (2) the damage parameters of reinforced concrete pier under the action of near-fault earthquake and far field ground motion are compared; According to the characteristics of incremental dynamic analysis method, the peak values of selected near-fault ground motion records and far-field ground motion records are adjusted respectively. The parameter changes of reinforced concrete pier under the seismic fortification standards of small earthquake (0.1g), moderate earthquake (0.2g) and large earthquake (0.4g) are compared and verified. The conclusion of comparative analysis is given. (3) based on the concept of theoretical vulnerability analysis, the vulnerability curve of reinforced concrete pier for near-fault seismic action is established. The vulnerability curves of the above three damage parameters used in near-fault seismic action are given, and the vulnerability of reinforced concrete pier is evaluated. In order to better explain the results, the vulnerability curves under the action of far-field ground motion are also compared and verified.
【学位授予单位】:石家庄铁道大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:U442.55;U448.34
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘启方;袁一凡;金星;丁海平;;近断层地震动的基本特征[J];地震工程与工程振动;2006年01期
2 杨迪雄;王汉兵;李刚;;近断层地震动对短肢剪力墙高层结构地震反应的影响[J];地震工程与工程振动;2008年06期
3 李明;谢礼立;翟长海;杨永强;;近断层地震动区域的划分[J];地震工程与工程振动;2009年05期
4 江义;杨迪雄;李刚;;近断层地震动向前方向性效应和滑冲效应对高层钢结构地震反应的影响[J];建筑结构学报;2010年09期
5 张长庚;杨迪雄;;近断层地震动和单自由度体系地震反应的分形特征分析[J];地震工程与工程振动;2011年06期
6 赵志航;车伟;冯群;;基于移动平均分解的近断层地震动弹性反应谱研究[J];郑州大学学报(工学版);2012年04期
7 盛俭;薄景山;佴磊;邹春红;;近断层地震动场预测——以长春市为例[J];地震工程与工程振动;2012年02期
8 冯启民,邵广彪;近断层地震动速度、位移峰值衰减规律的研究[J];地震工程与工程振动;2004年04期
9 杨迪雄;王伟;;近断层地震动的频谱周期参数和非平稳特征分析[J];地震工程与工程振动;2009年05期
10 石岩;王东升;孙治国;;近断层地震动下减隔震桥梁地震反应分析[J];桥梁建设;2014年03期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 郭恩;周锡元;;近断层地震动速度大脉冲对典型结构影响的概述[A];第19届全国结构工程学术会议论文集(第Ⅲ册)[C];2010年
2 王峥峥;高波;臧万军;;近断层地震动的速度脉冲效应对大坝地震损伤反应的影响[A];现代水利水电工程抗震防灾研究与进展[C];2009年
3 谢俊举;温增平;李小军;黄隽彦;;汶川地震近断层地震动的速度脉冲特性[A];中国地震学会第14次学术大会专题[C];2012年
4 王栋;温瑞智;谢礼立;;上/下盘效应的影响因素[A];第八届全国地震工程学术会议论文集(Ⅰ)[C];2010年
相关博士学位论文 前6条
1 李明;近断层地震动对结构抗震设计的影响研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2010年
2 盛俭;长春市近断层地震动场预测[D];吉林大学;2008年
3 申彦利;基于概率的近断层地震作用下结构抗震性能评估[D];北京交通大学;2010年
4 刘启方;基于运动学和动力学震源模型的近断层地震动研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2005年
5 胡进军;近断层地震动方向性效应及超剪切破裂研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2009年
6 王栋;近断层地震动的上/下盘效应研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张长庚;近断层地震动的分形特性分析[D];大连理工大学;2011年
2 赵晓芬;近断层地震动速度脉冲的识别方法及对隔震结构的影响研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2015年
3 赵占飞;近断层地震动作用下钢筋混凝土桥墩易损性评价[D];石家庄铁道大学;2015年
4 杨丕鑫;近断层地震动和单自由度体系地震动力响应的混沌特性分析[D];大连理工大学;2009年
5 潘建伟;近断层地震动的强度度量参数和层间位移谱分析[D];大连理工大学;2008年
6 王伟;近断层地震动的频谱特性和能量谱分析[D];大连理工大学;2010年
7 王栋;断层倾角对近断层地震动特征的影响[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2006年
8 刘毅;近断层地震动的需求谱和持时效应分析[D];大连理工大学;2012年
9 赵国臣;基于分解方法的近断层地震动特性精细化分析[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2014年
10 龙海丰;近断层地震动的规格化反应谱和回归分析[D];大连理工大学;2013年
,本文编号:2262135
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/2262135.html