当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 路桥论文 >

含磷材料固化锌、铅污染土的路用性能试验研究

发布时间:2018-11-22 08:51
【摘要】:采用新型含磷材料(KMP)及水泥(PC)分别对锌、铅污染土进行固化处理。通过无侧限抗压强度、水稳性、回弹模量和压汞试验,探究固化污染土作为路基填料的力学及耐久特性。结果表明:常规养护条件下,KMP和PC固化污染土强度随龄期和掺量增长而提高,强度越大;锌、铅复合污染条件下,固化污染土强度最低。经过泡水试验,固化试样强度均有所下降且7d强度损失较高;铅、锌复合污染条件下,强度降低幅度最高,水稳系数为0.52~0.58。固化污染土回弹模量低于固化未污染土但高于未固化污染土回弹模量,且KMP试样回弹模量高于水泥试样回弹模量的6.7%~24.2%。相对PC固化污染土,KMP试样微孔隙多、中、大孔隙较少,结构致密。
[Abstract]:Zinc and lead contaminated soils were cured by new phosphorous material (KMP) and cement (PC) respectively. Based on the tests of unconfined compressive strength, water stability, elastic modulus and mercury injection, the mechanical and durability characteristics of solidified contaminated soil as subgrade fillers were investigated. The results show that under conventional curing conditions, the strength of KMP and PC solidified contaminated soils increases with the increase of age and content, and the strength of cured contaminated soils increases with the increase of age and content, while the strength of solidified contaminated soils is the lowest under the condition of zinc and lead compound pollution. The strength of solidified samples decreased and the loss of strength was higher in 7 days after the test of foam water, and the decrease of strength was the highest under the condition of lead and zinc compound pollution, and the coefficient of water stability was 0.52 ~ 0.58. The elastic modulus of solidified contaminated soil is lower than that of solidified uncontaminated soil but higher than that of unsolidified contaminated soil, and the elastic modulus of KMP sample is higher than that of cement sample. Compared with PC solidified contaminated soil, KMP sample has more micropores, less macropores and denser structure.
【作者单位】: 东南大学江苏省城市地下工程与环境安全重点实验室;江苏省电力设计院;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金重点项目(41330641)、国家自然科学基金(51278100,41472258) 863计划(2013AA06A206) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK 2012022)
【分类号】:U414

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 廖晓勇;崇忠义;阎秀兰;赵丹;;城市工业污染场地:中国环境修复领域的新课题[J];环境科学;2011年03期

2 丁建文;洪振舜;刘松玉;;疏浚淤泥流动固化土的压汞试验研究[J];岩土力学;2011年12期

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李玉双;胡晓钧;宋雪英;孙铁珩;侯永侠;;城市工业污染场地土壤修复技术研究进展[J];安徽农业科学;2012年10期

2 杨勇;何艳明;栾景丽;刘景洋;郭玉文;;国际污染场地土壤修复技术综合分析[J];环境科学与技术;2012年10期

3 曾纪勇;赵艳玲;李建华;高杨;付馨;何厅厅;王亚云;;重金属污染场地再利用的健康风险评估研究[J];工业安全与环保;2013年04期

4 曾纪勇;赵艳玲;李建华;高杨;何厅厅;王亚云;;重金属工业污染场地再利用适宜性评价——以广东省东莞麻涌镇某污染场地为例[J];国土资源科技管理;2013年04期

5 韩进;汪福旺;贵大伟;王孙]/;;工业场地碱污染土壤修复工程案例研究[J];环境科学与管理;2013年08期

6 张长波;;污染场地土壤和地下水修复工程施工监理的个案研究[J];环境科学与技术;2013年10期

7 傅强;郑克仁;谢友均;周锡玲;蔡锋良;;水泥乳化沥青砂浆孔体积的分形特征[J];硅酸盐学报;2013年11期

8 曾小钦;;地铁工程与废弃工业场地的环境影响分析及措施探讨[J];低碳世界;2014年23期

9 周昱;保],

本文编号:2348760


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/2348760.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户28f20***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com