当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 环境工程论文 >

氨吹脱—混凝处理奶牛养殖废水厌氧出水的试验研究

发布时间:2018-01-01 03:05

  本文关键词:氨吹脱—混凝处理奶牛养殖废水厌氧出水的试验研究 出处:《安徽工业大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 奶牛养殖 沼液 UASB 氨吹脱 混凝


【摘要】:奶牛场废水氨氮、有机物浓度高,经过厌氧处理后,虽然大部分有机物得以去除,但氨氮浓度不降反升,碳氮比失调,给后续好氧处理带来困难,处理效果差,往往难以达标排放,探索高效、适用的厌氧出水后续处理工艺具有重大的现实意义。本文针对奶牛场废水厌氧出水的后续处理问题,以马鞍山蒙牛现代牧场废水处理中的UASB出水为研究对象,进行氨吹脱和混凝试验处理,试验过程中,采用单因素试验、响应曲面试验,分析了运行参数对氨吹脱和混凝工艺对奶牛养殖场厌氧出水的处理的影响,以及各工艺参数之间的交互作用,确定了氨吹脱和混凝的最佳工艺条件,分别得出了以氨氮、CODCr以及SS去除率为响应值的二次多项式回归模型,为该组合工艺处理奶牛养殖废水提供理论依据和基础数据,主要研究结论如下:(1)试验首先对UASB厌氧出水进行氨吹脱处理单因素试验,随着吹脱时间的增加,氨氮去除率逐渐增加,5h以后变化均趋于平缓,且吹脱时间5-6h之间不存在显著差异(P0.05),试验确定较佳的吹脱时间范围为5-6h;氨氮去除率随着pH值的增大逐渐升高,pH值大于11以后变化趋势减缓,且pH值为11与12之间不存在显著差异(P0.05),试验确定氨吹脱的较佳pH值范围为11-12;氨氮去除率随气液比的增大而增大,当气液比为1000-3000时,氨氮去除率较显著增加(P0.01),而当气液比大于3000时,氨氮去除率变化趋于平缓,试验确定的较佳气液比范围为3000-4000;氨氮去除率随着温度的升高而逐渐增加,温度为10℃-30℃时,氨氮去除率变化较显著(P0.01),温度继续升高,氨氮去除率变化不大,试验确定适宜的吹脱水温为30℃。(2)氨吹脱响应曲面试验采用Box-Behnken设计,建立了以氨氮去除率为响应值的二次多项式回归模型方程。对氨吹脱工艺参数的交互作用分析得出:pH值和吹脱时间以及吹脱时间和温度的交互作用不显著,pH值和温度的交互作用显著。对氨吹脱工艺进行了优化,得出优化参数:pH值为11.5,吹脱时间为5.3h,温度为32.5℃。其对应的响应值所能取到的最大值为92.8%。(3)对氨吹脱出水进行混凝单因素试验,确定PFS为较优的试验用絮凝剂。随着PFS投加量的逐渐增加,CODCr和SS去除率呈现先升高后降低的趋势,具有显著差异(P0.05);随着搅拌速率的增大,CODCr和SS去除率呈先增大后减小的趋势,且有显著差异(P0.05);随着搅拌时间的增加,CODCr和SS去除率呈现先升高后逐渐降低的趋势,差异显著(P0.05),当搅拌时间为4、5min时,其对应的SS去除率相差不大;沉淀时间在5-20min,随着沉降时间的延长,CODCr和SS去除率迅速增大,有显著差异(P0.05),20min以后增幅明显变小,无显著差异(P0.05)。试验确定的PFS投加量、搅拌速率、搅拌时间、沉降时间分别为2.85g·L-1、180r·min-1、4-5min、20-25min。(4)采用Box-Behnken设计对混凝工艺进行了响应曲面试验,分别以CODCr去除率和SS去除率为响应值,建立了二次多项式回归模型。并评价了混凝参数对响应值的交互作用:对CODCr去除率,PFS投加量、搅拌速率、搅拌时间、沉降时间两两交互作用不显著;对SS去除率,搅拌速率和沉降时间的交互作用显著,其它参数之间的两两交互作用均不显著。优化试验得出混凝的优化参数:PFS投加量为2.75g·L-1,搅拌速率为180r·min-1,搅拌时间为4.4min,沉降时间为22.8min。此优化参数下,CODCr去除率可达79.8%,SS去除率可达73.6%。(5)奶牛养殖废水UASB出水经吹脱和混凝处理后,出水CODCr、BOD5、SS、氨氮浓度达到《畜禽养殖业污染物排放标准》(GB18596-2001)。对组合工艺进行经济可行性分析,吹脱和混凝水处理成本约为5.6元·(m3)-1。
[Abstract]:Dairy wastewater, high concentration of organic compounds, by anaerobic treatment, although removal can be most organic compounds, but the ammonia concentration did not fall but rise, carbon and nitrogen ratio, bring difficulties to the subsequent aerobic treatment, the treatment effect is poor, often difficult to discharge, to explore efficient, has great realistic significance for subsequent treatment of anaerobic effluent suitable for the process. The dairy processing wastewater anaerobic effluent, Ma'anshan Mengniu modern ranch in wastewater treatment UASB water as the research object, ammonia stripping and coagulation test, during the test, the single factor experiment, response surface test, analysis of the operation parameters on ammonia stripping and the coagulation process of dairy farm anaerobic effluent treatment effect, and interaction between various process parameters, to determine the optimum conditions of ammonia removal and coagulation, were obtained by ammonia nitrogen, CODCr And the SS removal rate as the response value of two order polynomial regression model, and provide a theoretical basis and basic data for the combined process for treatment of dairy wastewater, the main conclusions are as follows: (1) the first test of UASB anaerobic effluent ammonia stripping process of single factor test, with the increase of the time of blowing off, ammonia nitrogen removal rate increased gradually after the change, 5h tended to be stable, and there is no significant difference between the blow off time of 5-6h (P0.05), the test to determine the better stripping time range is 5-6h; the removal rate of ammonia nitrogen increased gradually with the increase of pH value, pH value is greater than 11 after the trend slowed down, for 11 and 12 and there is no significant difference between the value of pH (P0.05), the ammonia stripping test to determine the optimal pH value range is 11-12; the removal rate of ammonia nitrogen with the gas-liquid ratio increases when the gas-liquid ratio was 1000-3000, the removal rate of ammonia nitrogen was significantly increased (P0.01), and when the gas-liquid ratio is greater than 3000, The removal rate of ammonia nitrogen changes slowly, test the optimum gas-liquid ratio is in the range of 3000-4000; the removal rate of ammonia nitrogen increased gradually with increasing temperature, the temperature of 10 DEG -30 DEG C, the ammonia removal rate changes significantly (P0.01), the temperature continues to rise, the removal rate of ammonia nitrogen stripping test to determine the changes a little, the water temperature is 30 C is suitable. (2) ammonia stripping using Box-Behnken design response surface test, established on the ammonia nitrogen removal rate as the response value of the two polynomial regression equation. The interaction of ammonia removal process parameters obtained: pH value and stripping time and blow off the interaction of time and temperature is not significant. The interaction of temperature and pH value significantly. The ammonia stripping process was optimized, the optimized parameters are: pH value is 11.5, the stripping time is 5.3h, the temperature of 32.5 DEG. The corresponding response value of the maximum can reach to 92.8%. (3) of ammonia stripping The single factor test of mixed coagulation, PFS was determined to test the better with flocculant. With increasing dosage of PFS, CODCr and SS removal rate increased firstly and then decreased, with significant difference (P0.05); with the increase of stirring rate, CODCr and SS removal rate of the first increased and then decreased. The trend, and there is significant difference (P0.05); with the increase of stirring time, CODCr and SS removal rate increased firstly and then decreased gradually, significant difference (P0.05), when the stirring time was 4,5min, the removal rate of SS had little difference; precipitation in 5-20min, with prolonging the settling time. CODCr and SS removal rate increased rapidly, there was significant difference (P0.05), 20min increase significantly smaller, no significant difference (P0.05). Experimental determination of PFS dosage, stirring rate, stirring time and settling time were 2.85g, L-1180r, min-1,4-5min, 20-25min. (4) by Box-B The ehnken design of the response surface test of coagulation process, respectively, with CODCr removal rate and SS removal rate as the response value, established two polynomial regression model. And to evaluate the coagulation parameters on interaction response values: the removal rates of CODCr, PFS dosage, stirring rate, stirring time, settlement 22 there was no significant interaction; the removal rate of SS, the interaction of stirring rate and settling time was 22, the interaction between other parameters were not significant. The optimized parameters of the optimized coagulation test: PFS dosage was 2.75g - L-1, 180r - min-1 stirring rate, stirring time is 4.4min. The settlement time is 22.8min. the optimization parameters, the removal rate of CODCr was 79.8%, SS removal rate of 73.6%. (5) of cattle farm wastewater by air stripping and UASB effluent after coagulation treatment, the effluent CODCr, BOD5, SS, ammonia nitrogen concentration reached the "discharge standard of pollutants (> GB18596-2001). Economic feasibility analysis of combined process, the cost of stripping and coagulating water treatment is about 5.6 yuan (M3) -1..

【学位授予单位】:安徽工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:X713

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李伟英;“混凝”新释义及混凝技术[J];工业用水与废水;2001年02期

2 余承烈,宁林红;对混凝过程的几点新认识[J];轻金属;2003年11期

3 湛含辉,张晓琪,罗定提;混凝机理的研究现状及其定义[J];株洲工学院学报;2003年05期

4 湛含辉,张晓琪;混凝过程机理研究及其物理模型[J];选煤技术;2003年05期

5 含辉;混凝(沉降)反应试验成果及研究方向[J];煤炭加工与综合利用;2004年01期

6 张健;;强化混凝处理城市纳污河污水运行过程中搅拌能量的影响[J];环境工程学报;2008年10期

7 刘前军;南军;李圭白;;钢铁总排废水混凝过程的动态监测[J];中国给水排水;2011年21期

8 郭起华;;印染废水混凝过程中磷酸盐作用初探[J];工业水处理;1987年03期

9 王志石;胶体的光学效应及混凝速率的测定[J];清华大学学报(自然科学版);1989年03期

10 王继徽;;制革综合废水混凝处理优化条件研究[J];湖南大学学报(自然科学版);1993年02期

相关会议论文 前5条

1 赵宗升;章双霜;柴峰;贾维靖;;混凝动力学的发展历程[A];2010中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集(第四卷)[C];2010年

2 王晓昌;金鹏康;;水中天然腐植酸的混凝过程和机理研究[A];中国化学会第七届水处理化学大会暨学术研讨会会议论文集[C];2004年

3 邴永鑫;虢清伟;许振成;易皓;崔恺;;预氧化+混凝去除饮用水中高浓度铊的工艺研究[A];中国环境科学学会学术年会光大环保优秀论文集(2014)[C];2014年

4 邴永鑫;虢清伟;许振成;易皓;崔恺;;预氧化+混凝去除饮用水中高浓度铊的工艺研究[A];2014中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集(第五章)[C];2014年

5 关小红;李朝阳;王琪;;As(Ⅴ)/As(Ⅲ)在FeCl_3混凝过程中的行为比较[A];第六届全国环境化学大会暨环境科学仪器与分析仪器展览会摘要集[C];2011年

相关博士学位论文 前6条

1 谢经良;亚铁基复合混凝脱色剂制备及其在针织印染废水处理中的应用研究[D];中国海洋大学;2011年

2 张会琴;混凝—高级氧化耦合处理印染废水和微污染原水的效果及机理研究[D];重庆大学;2010年

3 金鹏康;腐植酸混凝的化学成因、形态学特征及动力学研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2005年

4 胡保安;混凝微滤工艺处理微污染原水和低放废水的应用研究[D];天津大学;2008年

5 吕建晓;表面活性剂SDS胶束聚集行为及其机理的研究[D];大连理工大学;2007年

6 李亚强;粉煤灰混凝剂制备及用于混凝—人工湿地处理污水效能研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 林雅逢;磁加载混凝应急饮用水处理试验研究及设计[D];浙江大学;2015年

2 向克俭;混凝联合技术处理昆明市洗车废水的试验研究[D];昆明理工大学;2015年

3 江莲;地表水处理工艺与残留铝含量的研究[D];长安大学;2015年

4 董红钰;铁盐混凝剂中铁形态对混凝—超滤联用工艺的影响[D];山东大学;2015年

5 李庆桂;水中颗粒物形态特征对膜污染过程的影响研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2015年

6 沈s,

本文编号:1362629


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/huanjinggongchenglunwen/1362629.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f7687***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com