基于LCA的AAO与AO污水处理工艺比较
本文选题:污水处理 + AO工艺与AAO工艺比较 ; 参考:《大连理工大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:污水处理是一项环保工程,是将含有高污染物的污水经过处理达到排放标准后排放,减少了污染物的排放量,保护了水环境。同时,污水处理又是一项高能耗的工程,需要消耗大量的能源,还可能产生二次污染,比如恶臭、噪声和污泥等。传统的评估和选择污水处理工艺的方法,未能充分考虑不同工艺对环境产生的总负荷,仅仅在技术和经济方面进行考虑和比选,也具有一定的局限性,无法做到以全面的环境负荷去评价城市污水的污染问题。本文拟通过分析案例污水厂改造前后的工艺参数变化,尝试建立一种较全面的比较和评估污水厂污水处理工艺、方案的方法。生命周期评价(LCA)是一种新兴的、具有生命力和发展前景的环境管理工具,在国际上备受关注,正在越来越多地被应用到各个领域。本文选用生命周期评价的方法,借助GaBi软件的辅助,对案例污水处理厂改造前的A/O工艺和改造后的A/A/O工艺进行生命周期的比较分析,得出结论:案例污水处理厂改造后的A/A/O工艺中来自富营养化潜力和海洋水生生态毒性的环境影响要明显低于改造前的A/O工艺,而来自非生物枯竭因子、非生物消耗化石燃料、酸化潜力、淡水水生生态毒性、人类潜在毒性和潜在生态毒性的环境影响略低于改造前的A/O工艺,同时,来自全球变暖潜能、臭氧层损耗潜力和臭氧层创造潜力的环境影响略高于改造前的A/O工艺。在所研究的环境影响类别中,来自海洋水生生态毒性的环境影响贡献最为显著,且环境影响的贡献值A/A/O工艺低于A/O工艺;其次是全球变暖潜能的环境影响贡献略高,且改造前后没有显著变化;其它环境影响类别的环境影响贡献很小。通过对两种工艺的比较和分析得知,改造后的A/A/O工艺优于改造前的A/O工艺。为了进一步减少污水处理厂的环境影响,使得其对环境造成的影响更小,提出改善建议:污水处理厂实现减排的同时,也实现节能降耗,可以采用根据溶解氧实时调控曝气量,使用水源热泵等方式节约用电,尽可能地减少电能的消耗,以减少其所带来的环境负荷;同时,化学药剂的采购和使用应尽量高效,以减少化学药品的用量,减少其所带来的环境负荷;尽可能地增加污水回用量,节约用水,以增加其环境正效应:在有条件的情况下,尽量考虑污泥厌氧消化能源回用以及污泥N、P的回收,尽可能地减少能源和资源的消耗,带来环境正效应。
[Abstract]:Sewage treatment is an environmental protection project. It can reduce the discharge of pollutants and protect the water environment by treating the sewage containing high pollutants to meet the discharge standard. At the same time, sewage treatment is a high energy consumption project, which needs a lot of energy consumption, and may produce secondary pollution, such as odor, noise and sludge. The traditional methods of evaluating and selecting wastewater treatment processes, which fail to fully take into account the total load of different processes on the environment, only consider and compare the technical and economic aspects, also have some limitations. It is impossible to evaluate the pollution of urban sewage with comprehensive environmental load. This paper attempts to establish a more comprehensive method to compare and evaluate the wastewater treatment process and scheme by analyzing the change of technological parameters before and after the transformation of the wastewater treatment plant. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a new environmental management tool with vitality and development prospects. It has attracted much attention in the world and is being applied to more and more fields. In this paper, the life cycle of A / O process before revamping and A / O process after revamping is compared and analyzed with the aid of Gabi software. It is concluded that the environmental impact from eutrophication potential and marine aquatic ecological toxicity in the modified A- / O process in the case sewage treatment plant is significantly lower than that in the prior A- / O process, but comes from abiotic depletion factors and abiotic consumption of fossil fuels. The environmental impacts of acidification potential, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, human potential toxicity and potential ecological toxicity are slightly lower than those of the pre-revamped A- / O process and, at the same time, from global warming potential. The environmental impact of ozone layer depletion potential and ozone layer creation potential is slightly higher than that of the pre-revamped A- / O process. Among the environmental impact categories studied, the environmental impact from marine aquatic ecological toxicity was the most significant, and the contribution value of the environmental impact was lower than that of the A- / O process, followed by the contribution of the global warming potential to the environmental impact. There is no significant change before and after transformation, and the contribution of other environmental impact categories is very small. Through the comparison and analysis of the two processes, it is found that the modified A / O process is superior to the pre-revamped A / O process. In order to further reduce the environmental impact of the wastewater treatment plant and make the environmental impact smaller, the paper puts forward some suggestions for improvement: while reducing emissions, the wastewater treatment plant can also realize energy saving and consumption reduction, so the aeration rate can be adjusted in real time according to the dissolved oxygen. The use of water source heat pumps and other ways to save electricity and minimize the consumption of electricity in order to reduce the environmental load it brings; at the same time, the purchase and use of chemicals should be as efficient as possible in order to reduce the amount of chemicals used, Reduce its environmental load; increase the amount of wastewater reused as much as possible and save water to increase its positive environmental effects: when conditions are available, try to consider sludge anaerobic digestion energy reuse and sludge NNP recovery, Reduce energy and resource consumption as much as possible and bring about positive environmental effects.
【学位授予单位】:大连理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:X703
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张照韩;冯玉杰;苏惠;任南琪;;AO与AAO工艺去除雌激素效能对比及分析[J];环境科学学报;2011年01期
2 陈洪斌;唐贤春;何群彪;屈计宁;高廷耀;;倒置AAO工艺聚磷微生物的吸磷行为[J];中国环境科学;2007年01期
3 张硕;邹伟国;;多点进水的倒置AAO工艺处理低碳源城市合流污水[J];环境科技;2014年01期
4 孔繁鑫;陈洪斌;何群彪;;中低温条件下倒置AAO工艺处理黑水的脱氮除磷特性研究[J];水处理技术;2011年05期
5 傅钢,董滨,周增炎,高廷耀;倒置AAO工艺的设计特点与运行参数[J];中国给水排水;2004年09期
6 朱五星;汪诚文;施汉昌;;倒置AAO工艺中物料及能量流向的研究[J];环境工程学报;2007年03期
7 施汉昌;蒲丽梅;沈童刚;;城市污水处理AAO工艺节能降耗控制技术[J];建设科技;2011年21期
8 秦振清;余轶峰;;连续式硝化调试新工艺在焦化厂AAO污水处理中的应用[J];柳钢科技;2010年01期
9 闫志谦;程艳坤;霍鹏;康爱彬;范继业;;AAO工艺反硝化生物滤池中氨氮去除的影响因素研究[J];安徽农业科学;2011年30期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 刘辉;马洁;姚中科;路学丽;;制备以AAO为模板可调控的纳米TiO_2材料[A];第十三次全国电化学会议论文摘要集(下集)[C];2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 张晶晶;基于AAO纳米光栅表面陷光结构的太阳能电池的实验研究[D];天津工业大学;2016年
2 刘丽;基于LCA的AAO与AO污水处理工艺比较[D];大连理工大学;2015年
3 周江波;阳极氧化铝模板(AAO)的制备与应用研究[D];首都师范大学;2006年
4 白莹莹;纬向平均气流变动的主要模态及其与AO、AAO和ENSO的联系[D];南京信息工程大学;2007年
5 钟毅;AAO-液晶双模板结合法制备介孔纳米线电极及性能研究[D];兰州大学;2009年
6 周瑜;AAO工艺曝气控制系统的建模和控制策略的研究[D];上海交通大学;2012年
7 赖后伟;阿莫西林对AAO城市污水处理工艺运行的影响及其生物降解行为研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2013年
8 杜艳君;纳米α-Al_2O_3、γ-Al_2O_3粉体及AAO膜的制备与表征[D];河北大学;2006年
,本文编号:2052243
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/huanjinggongchenglunwen/2052243.html