当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 环境工程论文 >

河岸防护林对土壤重金属含量的影响及其生态风险研究

发布时间:2018-06-26 03:23

  本文选题:重金属 + 土壤 ; 参考:《西南农业学报》2017年02期


【摘要】:为了解不同植被配置模式的河岸防护林土壤重金属的含量特征和污染状况,提出能有效降解土壤重金属危害的植被配置模式。本文选择了成都市沙河生态景观防护林带中的乔灌草、乔草、灌草以及单层灌木林和草坪等5种典型植被配置模式林分,测定了Mn、Cr、Co、Ni、Cu、Zn、Cd和As等重金属和全N、全K和全P等主要营养元素在土壤中的分配状况;并对土壤重金属的生态风险进行了评价。1 Mn、Zn、Cr和Pb等8种重金属元素含量在不同植被配置模式下均有显著性差异(P0.05),总体表现为Mn含量最高,Zn次之,再次是CrPbNiCuCo;As含量最低。2根据土壤环境质量标准(GB15618—1995)评价结果表明,Cr、Ni、Cu、Co和As在5中植被配置模式下均没有超过临界值,Zn在5种植被配置模式下的土壤含量均超过临界值;Mn和Pb则表现为部分配置模式下超过临界值;3土层中分配上,各元素总体表现为土层20~40 cm含量高于0~20 cm。4通过相关性对重金属的来源初步解析表明,0~20 cm土层中重金属来源明显比20~40 cm土层复杂。5Mn、Cr、Co等8种重金属元素在5种植被配置模式下主要表现为未污染或轻度污染和轻度危害。乔灌草配置模式I(植被从上到下依次为:香樟、女贞+十大功劳、迎春+鸢尾)重金属含量最低,综合污染指数和污染的生态风险指数最低。
[Abstract]:In order to understand the characteristics of heavy metals content and pollution in riparian shelterbelts with different vegetation allocation patterns, a vegetation allocation model which can effectively degrade heavy metals in soil was proposed. In this paper, five typical vegetation allocation models, such as Arbor and Irrigation, Arbor Grass, Irrigation, single layer shrub and Lawn, are selected in the shelterbelt of Shahe Ecological Landscape in Chengdu. The distribution of heavy metals, total N, total K and total P in soils, such as heavy metals, total N, total K and total P, were determined. The ecological risk of heavy metals in soil was evaluated. The contents of 8 heavy metals, such as mn, Zn, Cr and Pb, were significantly different under different vegetation patterns (P0.05). Again, CrPbNiCuCoAs content is the lowest .2 according to the soil environmental quality standard (GB15618-1995), the results show that both CrPbNiCuCoAs Co and as do not exceed the critical value under 5 vegetation allocation modes. The distribution of mn and Pb in the soil layer above the critical value of mn and Pb is higher than the critical value in the partial collocation mode. The results showed that the content of heavy metals in 2040 cm soil layer was higher than that in 0 ~ 20 cm.4 soil layer. The preliminary analysis of the source of heavy metals showed that the heavy metal source in the soil layer of 20 ~ 20 cm soil layer was obviously more complicated than that in 20 ~ 40 cm soil layer. 5MnCU Cr ~ (2 +) Co and other eight heavy metal elements were mixed in 5 planting plants. The main performance of the model is no pollution or mild pollution and slight harm. The distribution model I of Arbor and Irrigation grasses (from top to bottom): camphor camphora, Ligustrum privet, Iris japonicus) had the lowest heavy metal content, the comprehensive pollution index and the ecological risk index of pollution were the lowest.
【作者单位】: 四川省林业科学研究院;
【基金】:林业公益行业专项课题“美丽城镇森林景观的构建技术研究与示范”(201404301)
【分类号】:X53;X173

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨阳;周正朝;王欢欢;张越;曹睿;王若丹;;沣河沿岸土壤和优势植物重金属富集特征和潜在生态风险[J];生态学报;2013年21期

2 秦鱼生;喻华;冯文强;王正银;涂仕华;;成都平原北部水稻土重金属含量状况及其潜在生态风险评价[J];生态学报;2013年19期

3 唐浩;朱江;黄沈发;邱江平;;蚯蚓在土壤重金属污染及其修复中的应用研究进展[J];土壤;2013年01期

4 方晰;唐志娟;田大伦;项文化;孙伟军;;长沙城市森林土壤7种重金属含量特征及其潜在生态风险[J];生态学报;2012年23期

5 张菊;陈诗越;邓焕广;吴爱琴;孙卫波;陈影影;;山东省部分水岸带土壤重金属含量及污染评价[J];生态学报;2012年10期

6 王广林;张金池;庄家尧;苏继申;;31种园林植物对重金属的富集研究[J];皖西学院学报;2011年05期

7 孙慧珍;陆小静;陈明月;蔡春菊;祝宁;;哈尔滨市不同类型人工林土壤重金属含量[J];应用生态学报;2011年03期

8 范拴喜;甘卓亭;李美娟;张掌权;周旗;;土壤重金属污染评价方法进展[J];中国农学通报;2010年17期

9 王谦;成水平;;大型水生植物修复重金属污染水体研究进展[J];环境科学与技术;2010年05期

10 宁晓波;项文化;方晰;闫文德;邓湘雯;;贵阳花溪区石灰土林地土壤重金属含量特征及其污染评价[J];生态学报;2009年04期

【二级参考文献】

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 王常慧;内蒙古温带典型草原土壤净氮矿化作用[D];中国科学院研究生院(植物研究所);2005年

2 谢学俭;苏南稻麦轮作农田系统土壤中磷氮的流失[D];南京农业大学;2003年



本文编号:2068853

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/huanjinggongchenglunwen/2068853.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8b79f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com