大麦近等基因系苗期根系形态及叶片渗透调节物质对PEG胁迫的响应
本文选题:大麦 切入点:株高近等基因系 出处:《中国农业科学》2017年13期
【摘要】:【目的】研究大麦半矮秆基因uzu与抗旱性的关系,为大麦抗旱优质育种提供理论依据。【方法】以两套大麦株高近等基因系(3T、3D和15T、15D)为试验材料,采用营养液水培方式,以不同浓度的PEG6000模拟干旱胁迫,研究不同胁迫程度:对照(0)、轻度(5%)、中度(15%)和重度胁迫(25%)对大麦株高近等基因系幼苗株高、根冠比、根系形态及叶片渗透调节物质的影响。在幼苗长至四叶一心时取样,直尺测定株高;采用烘干称重法获得根系生物量和地上部生物量,二者比值乘以100%得到根冠比;利用根系扫描仪对样根进行扫描测量,并用Win RHIZO软件进行单株总根长、根表面积和根体积的分析;可溶性糖含量用硫酸-蒽酮比色法测定;可溶性蛋白含量用考马斯亮蓝G-250染色法测定;脯氨酸含量用酸性茚三酮显色法测定。【结果】随着PEG6000浓度的增加,大麦幼苗生长受到明显抑制,株高逐渐降低,而根冠比则呈相反的变化趋势。就根系形态而言,随胁迫程度的增加,两套近等基因系表现出不同的变化趋势,在轻度和中度胁迫下3D和15T的变化幅度分别小于3T和15D,在重度胁迫下则表现相反。可溶性糖含量随胁迫浓度的增加呈先升高后降低再升高的变化趋势,而可溶性蛋白含量变化趋势与可溶性糖含量相反;在轻度和中度胁迫下3D和15D的变化幅度分别小于3T和15T,在重度胁迫下也表现相反。但脯氨酸含量随胁迫浓度升高呈现上升趋势,且在不同胁迫浓度下均表现为3D和15D变化幅度较小。相关分析表明:不同胁迫处理下,除可溶性蛋白含量外,株高与其他性状均存在显著相关关系;根冠比与根系形态以及根系形态之间也存在显著相关关系。同时,具有较高可溶性糖含量的品系其脯氨酸含量也较高,而可溶性蛋白含量则较低。此外,根系形态与叶片渗透调节物质之间亦存在一定的相关性,即总根长和根表面积均与可溶性糖含量和脯氨酸含量呈现显著负相关关系。【结论】在根系形态及叶片渗透调节方面,大麦株高近等基因系对苗期不同干旱胁迫的响应存在差异并相互影响。在轻度和中度胁迫程度下,近等基因系3T和3D中半矮秆基因的存在有利于抵御干旱胁迫。
[Abstract]:[objective] to study the relationship between barley semi-dwarf gene uzu and drought resistance, and to provide theoretical basis for barley breeding for drought resistance and quality. Simulated drought stress with different concentrations of PEG6000 was used to study the effects of different stress levels on seedling height and root-shoot ratio of barley plant height and near isogenic line. The effects of root morphology and leaf osmotic regulatory substances on the root biomass and shoot biomass were obtained by measuring the plant height by measuring the plant height at the time of seedling growing to four leaves, and the root / shoot ratio was obtained by multiplying the ratio of root and shoot by 100%. The total root length, root surface area and root volume were analyzed by Win RHIZO software, and the content of soluble sugar was determined by sulfuric acid-anthrone colorimetry. The soluble protein content was determined by Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 staining and proline content by acid ninhydrin chromogenic method. [results] with the increase of PEG6000 concentration, the growth of barley seedlings was significantly inhibited and the plant height decreased. The root / shoot ratio showed a reverse trend. As for root morphology, with the increase of stress degree, two sets of near-isogenic lines showed different trends. The changes of 3D and 15T under mild and moderate stress were less than those of 3T and 15D, respectively, while under severe stress, the content of soluble sugar increased at first and then decreased and then increased with the increase of stress concentration. The change trend of soluble protein content was opposite to that of soluble sugar content. The changes of 3D and 15D under mild and moderate stress were less than 3T and 15T, respectively, but the proline content increased with the increase of stress concentration. The correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between plant height and other traits except soluble protein content under different stress concentrations. There was also a significant correlation between root / shoot ratio and root morphology, and proline content was higher and soluble protein content was lower in the lines with higher soluble sugar content. There was also a significant correlation between root morphology and leaf osmotic regulatory substances, that is, the total root length and root surface area were negatively correlated with soluble sugar content and proline content. [conclusion] in root morphology and leaf osmotic regulation, there was a significant negative correlation between root morphology and leaf osmotic regulation. The responses of near isogenic lines of barley plant height to drought stress at seedling stage were different and interacted. Under mild and moderate stress, the existence of semi-dwarf genes in near isogenic lines 3T and 3D was beneficial to resist drought stress.
【作者单位】: 河北农业大学生命科学学院;河北省作物生长调控实验室;河北农业大学农学院;
【基金】:河北省自然科学基金(C2011204016,C2015204066)
【分类号】:S512.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜欢;马彤彤;侯晓梦;张颖;白志英;李存东;;20对大麦株高近等基因系农艺与产量性状差异及相关性分析[J];华北农学报;2016年05期
2 袁蕊;李萍;胡晓雪;宗毓铮;孙敏;董琦;郝兴宇;;干旱胁迫对小麦生理特性及产量的影响[J];山西农业科学;2016年10期
3 米少艳;路斌;张颖;杜欢;白志英;李存东;;小麦代换系幼苗根系对低磷胁迫的生理响应暗示的染色体效应[J];植物营养与肥料学报;2016年05期
4 胡雯媚;王思宇;樊高琼;刘运军;郑文;王强生;马宏亮;;西南麦区小麦品种苗期抗旱性鉴定及其指标筛选[J];麦类作物学报;2016年02期
5 杨彩玲;刘立龙;CHUNG Nghiem Tien;秦华东;赵泉;陈德威;徐世宏;黄敏;江立庚;;土壤水分对免耕水稻根系生长的影响[J];华中农业大学学报;2016年01期
6 张维军;袁汉民;陈东升;王小亮;亢玲;何进尚;;小麦抗旱性生理生化机制及QTL研究进展[J];干旱地区农业研究;2015年06期
7 杜欢;张颖;薛梦瑶;靖姣姣;白志英;李存东;;大麦株高近等基因系的籽粒性状差异及相关性分析[J];华北农学报;2015年05期
8 惠宏杉;林立昊;齐军仓;廖乐;王超龙;程海涛;;干旱胁迫对大麦幼苗根系的影响[J];麦类作物学报;2015年09期
9 王稼苜;张志勇;欧行奇;胡杨;;PEG胁迫对8个不同小麦品种幼苗根系的影响[J];河南科技学院学报(自然科学版);2015年03期
10 靖姣姣;张颖;白志英;李存东;;盐胁迫对小麦代换系渗透调节物质的影响及染色体效应[J];植物遗传资源学报;2015年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜欢;马彤彤;郭帅;张颖;白志英;李存东;;大麦近等基因系苗期根系形态及叶片渗透调节物质对PEG胁迫的响应[J];中国农业科学;2017年13期
2 刘逸泠;覃盈盈;郑海雷;;红树植物耐水淹和高盐适应性研究进展[J];厦门大学学报(自然科学版);2017年03期
3 杨贝贝;赵丹丹;任永哲;辛泽毓;王志强;林同保;;不同小麦品种对干旱胁迫的形态生理响应及抗旱性分析[J];河南农业大学学报;2017年02期
4 阮三桂;姚帮松;肖卫华;张文萍;谢立钧;廖健程;丁鑫;;调亏灌溉对超级稻‘深两优5814’孕穗期根系生长的影响[J];中国农学通报;2017年09期
5 高宝云;张军;;9个冬小麦品种对苗期干旱的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J];山西农业科学;2017年03期
6 岳斌;裴雁曦;刘旦梅;刘志强;;气体信号分子H_2S对拟南芥生长发育的影响[J];山西农业科学;2017年02期
7 闫艳;王春华;穆平;;水、旱条件下小麦苗期部分农艺性状的遗传分析[J];中国农学通报;2017年03期
8 张鹏钰;卫丽;白田田;张宝娜;杨明达;韩静丽;关小康;王同朝;;河南省不同年代小麦品种苗期渗透胁迫的生理响应[J];华北农学报;2016年06期
9 薛盼盼;张强;魏学智;;模拟干旱胁迫对酸枣种子萌发及活力的影响[J];西北农业学报;2016年12期
10 靖姣姣;路斌;杜欢;张颖;白志英;李存东;;盐胁迫对小麦代换系光合性状的影响及染色体效应研究[J];麦类作物学报;2016年09期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吕仲昱;张志恒;马永强;吴刚;陈玉梅;王化俊;;外引啤酒大麦品种性状鉴定[J];大麦与谷类科学;2015年03期
2 张宇;司二静;孟亚雄;马小乐;李葆春;王化俊;;不同来源大麦材料的农艺性状和籽粒蛋白质含量及群体遗传结构分析[J];麦类作物学报;2015年07期
3 朱靖环;刘猛道;华为;尚毅;汪军妹;贾巧君;赵加涛;杨建明;;139份大麦种质材料苗期和成株期抗白粉病鉴定评价[J];麦类作物学报;2015年05期
4 司二静;张宇;汪军成;孟亚雄;李葆春;马小乐;尚勋武;王化俊;;大麦农艺性状与SSR标记的关联分析[J];作物学报;2015年07期
5 郭贵华;刘海艳;李刚华;刘明;李岩;王绍华;刘正辉;唐设;丁艳锋;;ABA缓解水稻孕穗期干旱胁迫生理特性的分析[J];中国农业科学;2014年22期
6 靖姣姣;张颖;白志英;李存东;;盐胁迫对小麦代换系幼苗叶片保护酶活性影响及染色体效应[J];华北农学报;2014年05期
7 柳鹏;邓西平;殷俐娜;王文华;徎本X,
本文编号:1669326
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/jiyingongcheng/1669326.html