从“人类起源之争”到“转基因食品大战”——关于“科学论战”在中国的思考
发布时间：2018-10-29 15:39
【摘要】："科学论战"是由"科学"引发并主战一方的学术论战乃至社会论战。梳理与中国密切相关的两场"科学论战"——"人类起源之争"和"转基因食品大战",及其中中西方学界,科学与人文领域学者,科学家与大众等群体间的差异和对话,发现论战背后的"利益共同体""民族主义""对话机制"等问题及"德先生与赛先生"的曲折发展引人深思。
[Abstract]:Scientific debate is an academic debate and even a social one initiated by Science. Combing the differences and dialogues between the two "scientific debates" closely related to China "the origin of human beings" and "genetically modified food wars", and the differences and dialogues between Chinese and Western academic circles, scholars in the field of science and humanities, scientists and the general public, etc. The problems of "interest community", "nationalism" and "dialogue mechanism" behind the controversy and the tortuous development of "Mr. de and Mr. Say" are found to be thought-provoking.
【作者单位】： 北京大学城市规划与设计学院;
【分类号】：G322
本文编号：2298106
[Abstract]:Scientific debate is an academic debate and even a social one initiated by Science. Combing the differences and dialogues between the two "scientific debates" closely related to China "the origin of human beings" and "genetically modified food wars", and the differences and dialogues between Chinese and Western academic circles, scholars in the field of science and humanities, scientists and the general public, etc. The problems of "interest community", "nationalism" and "dialogue mechanism" behind the controversy and the tortuous development of "Mr. de and Mr. Say" are found to be thought-provoking.
【作者单位】： 北京大学城市规划与设计学院;
【分类号】：G322
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 记者 齐芳;转基因食品安全吗？[N];光明日报;2010年
2 丁力;不科学的科学[N];经济观察报;2014年
3 席昱梅;科学问题还是让科学家来解析吧[N];中华工商时报;2013年
4 本报驻日内瓦记者 刘军;走近农业科研[N];光明日报;2003年
5 ;科普资料[N];中国消费者报;2000年
，本文编号：2298106
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/jiyingongcheng/2298106.html
最近更新
教材专著
