陆地棉李氏纤维突变体的植物形态学观察及基因定位
[Abstract]:Cotton is an important economic crop, and its fiber is the main raw material of the textile industry. The length, toughness and fineness of the fiber determine the quality of the fiber, and how to obtain high-yield and high-quality fiber is the premise to improve the economic benefit of cotton. Ligon-lintzessl, Li1, a mutant with very short fibers, was only 5-6 mm in the fiber, and the growth was slow, the plant was small and the stem and leaf were twisted, and the genetic analysis showed that the mutant was controlled by the dominant single-gene Li1. As an ideal material for studying the development of fiber, Li1 plays an important role in cloning cotton fiber-related genes and elucidating the molecular mechanism of fiber development. In order to have a more profound understanding of the morphological differences of the Li1 plants and to position the Li1 gene, the F2 population is configured by using the sea-island cotton H7124 and Li1 as the parent, and the genetic positioning of the Li1 gene is carried out by using the SSR and the SSCP molecular marker technology; In addition, by observing the morphology of the wild type and the mutant cell and the plant of Li1, the differential analysis of the system was carried out. The main results are as follows:1. 73 pairs of SSR and SSCP primers were designed according to the genome sequence of the Gossypium hirsutum L. and the results of the previous studies. The polymorphic screening of the parents showed that 28 pairs of primers were polymorphic, and 21 pairs of primers were stable and clear, and used to construct the genetic map. The genetic classification of 620 F2 single plants was carried out by using these polymorphic primers, and a genetic map with a span of 10.5 cM and an average spacing of 0.81 cM was constructed. The constructed genetic map consists of 13 marker sites, and the markers co-separated with Li1 are six: P98, P216, P219, P221, P222, and P234, the physical distance between these markers is different for different physical maps. There was a significant difference in the hairy density of the stem: in the high aspect of the plant, the wild-type average was 97.84 cm, the hybrid mutant was 60.88 cm, the homozygous mutant was only 27.82 cm, and in the seed-bearing aspect, the wild-type average per cotton boll could have 25 full seeds, and the hybrid mutant was 19, The homozygous mutant was only 12; in the aspect of the stalk, the wild-type was relatively dense and long, and the hybrid mutant was short and thin, while the homozygous mutant was short and thin.3. The observation of the optical microscope and electron-transmission microscope of the Li1 wild-type and mutant stem and leaf showed that: Some of the cell death in the vascular bundle in the stem of the mutant resulted in loose cells and even large cavities. Some of the leaf-meat cells in the leaves were separated from the mass wall, and compared with the wild-type, the organelles such as the chloroplast were poor in mass and less in number. And the wild-type cells are closely arranged, the structure is normal, and the organelles are in good quality. There was no significant difference in the morphology of the pollen tube and the pollen tube between the wild-type and the mutant under the microscope. There was a difference between the wild-type and the mutant in the pollen activity and the germination rate: the wild-type pollen activity was 89%, the hybrid mutation was 73%, the homozygous mutation was 62%, the germination rate of the wild-type pollen tube was 84%, the hybrid mutation was 79%, and the homozygous mutation was 69%. The protoplast of the high-energy cotton leaves was obtained by the enzymatic method, and the protoplast microfilament framework was marked with the F-Actin-specific fluorescent dye Alexa Fluor 488-phaloidein, and the morphology and arrangement pattern of the microfilaments can be clearly observed under the laser confocal microscope. The filament-like micro-filaments are distributed in a grid-like shape under the plasma membrane, and the chloroplast is rich and is wrapped by the micro-filament. Compared with the microfilament framework between the wild type and the mutant, the wild type microfilaments are found to be more and more arranged, and the number of microfilaments of the mutant is less, the length is short, and the arrangement is loose.
【学位授予单位】:浙江农林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S562
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梁乃亭,魏玉波,布哈丽且木;水稻超绿突变体“绿花舞”[J];上海农业学报;2002年S1期
2 杨朝柱;李春寿;舒小丽;张志转;张磊;赵海军;马传喜;吴殿星;;富含抗性淀粉水稻突变体的淀粉特性[J];中国水稻科学;2005年06期
3 张焕丽;郭晋太;黄江涛;朱永;韩建明;杨爱国;张俊平;郭瑛;;辣椒黄绿苗突变体9906M的选育及利用[J];辣椒杂志;2006年01期
4 郝中娜;张红志;陶荣祥;;水稻类病斑突变体的初步研究[J];核农学报;2007年04期
5 韦存虚;谢佩松;周卫东;陈义芳;严长杰;;水稻脆性突变体叶的解剖结构和化学特性[J];作物学报;2008年08期
6 ;全世界共200000份水稻突变体可供科学研究[J];分子植物育种;2009年02期
7 王立丰;陈月异;;白条纹水稻突变体的光合特性分析[J];热带作物学报;2010年12期
8 ;中国科学家从玉米中提取出抗艾蛋白酶突变体[J];广西科学;2011年01期
9 张水金;郑轶;朱永生;杨东;涂诗航;周鹏;郑家团;黄庭旭;;水稻脆性突变体研究进展[J];福建农业学报;2011年05期
10 李金军;潘日定;陆金根;高荣村;;水稻无种子类突变体的保存方法研究[J];中国稻米;2013年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 易小平;陈芳远;卢升安;周开达;;空间环境诱发水稻突变体特异亲和性研究[A];面向21世纪的科技进步与社会经济发展(上册)[C];1999年
2 戴新宾;张荣铣;许长成;匡廷云;;水稻叶绿素b减少突变体的光抑制特性研究[A];全国植物光合作用、光生物学及其相关的分子生物学学术研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2001年
3 金卫华;曹军卫;姚保利;雷铭;;细菌视紫红质多突变体的构建及其功能研究[A];第二届中国青年学者微生物遗传学学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
4 胡天岑;王奎锋;李连维;陈静;蒋华良;沈旭;;SARS冠状病毒3CL蛋白酶突变体的结构对其聚合-活性关系的提示[A];中国晶体学会第四届全国会员代表大会暨学术会议学术论文摘要集[C];2008年
5 李鹏丽;王宁宁;;微型番茄黄叶突变体的获得与鉴定[A];中国植物生理学会第十次会员代表大会暨全国学术年会论文摘要汇编[C];2009年
6 程备久;mail.hf.ah.cn);李展;mail.hf.ah.cn);朱苏文;mail.hf.ah.cn);李纯;mail.hf.ah.cn);李培金;mail.hf.ah.cn);谢传晓;mail.hf.ah.cn);;玉米对生突变体的遗传与分子标记研究[A];第八届全国激光生物学学术会议暨《激光生物学》创刊十周年庆祝会会议指南及论文摘要[C];2002年
7 许晓明;张荣铣;;水稻叶绿素缺乏突变体的吸收光能分配特性[A];中国植物生理学会全国学术年会暨成立40周年庆祝大会学术论文摘要汇编[C];2003年
8 林植芳;彭长连;徐信兰;林桂珠;张景六;;两个新的水稻缺叶绿素b突变体光合作用的热稳定性[A];中国植物生理学会第九次全国会议论文摘要汇编[C];2004年
9 魏玉波;梁乃亭;布哈丽且木;;水稻永绿突变体及应用价值[A];中国科协2005年学术年会论文集——核科技、核应用、核经济论坛[C];2005年
10 夏宗芗;邬键;甘建华;黄仲贤;;细胞色素b_5的一系列突变体的晶体结构及其与性质、功能的关系[A];第九次全国生物物理大会学术会议论文摘要集[C];2002年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 记者 张克;我科学家发现水稻衰老调控分子机制[N];科技日报;2014年
2 钱海丰 编译;植物耐盐基因的研究[N];中国高新技术产业导报;2002年
3 记者 冯卫东;美发现能控制小鼠胖瘦的基因[N];科技日报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 李成;诱导超氧化物歧化酶错误折叠的因素及其分子机制[D];武汉大学;2012年
2 张子栋;透明颤菌血红蛋白及其突变体蛋白对芳香族污染物清除作用的实验研究[D];东北林业大学;2015年
3 Syed Noor Muhammad Shah;黄瓜品系9930诱导突变体的研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
4 康乐群;家蚕新突变体4龄幼虫致死基因的定位克隆及功能研究[D];江苏科技大学;2015年
5 史贵霞;大豆子叶折叠突变体cco的转录组分析及相关基因的功能研究[D];南京农业大学;2014年
6 胡运高;直立重穗突变体的遗传分析、候选基因克隆与育种利用[D];四川农业大学;2015年
7 TAREK MOHAMED AHMED SOLIMAN(罗大力);通过γ-射线辐射处理菊花外植体筛选花色和花型突变体[D];中国农业大学;2014年
8 王濵;斑马鱼造血突变体的大规模筛选以及髓系过氧化物酶缺陷突变体smu681的基因定位克隆与功能研究[D];南方医科大学;2014年
9 刘逢举;陆地棉极短纤维突变体的遗传、精细定位与表达谱分析[D];南京农业大学;2010年
10 王旭;番茄rin突变体胎萌的生理机制及rin在胎萌中的作用[D];东北农业大学;2016年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 林婷婷;水稻窄叶白化突变体nul1(t)的鉴定与基因定位[D];西南大学;2015年
2 赵艳娜;拟南芥生长素合成YUCCA基因参与调控雄配子发育的机理研究[D];上海师范大学;2015年
3 朱环环;两个水稻苗期致死突变体abl25和ygll遗传分析与基因定位[D];上海师范大学;2015年
4 李红;采用分子动力学模拟探究VWF-A1突变体G561S的亲和力变化机制[D];华南理工大学;2015年
5 谷慧英;芥菜开花整合子SOC1与开花抑制因子SVP、FLC蛋白相互作用[D];西南大学;2015年
6 蒋发明;斑马鱼消化器官突变体的遗传筛选和Ubel蛋白的原核表达纯化及抗体生产[D];西南大学;2015年
7 王蓓华;支架蛋白RACK1及其突变体与氯离子通道蛋白1(CLIC1)相互作用的研究[D];安徽医科大学;2015年
8 张玲;水稻矮化并花发育异常突变体dwarf and deformed flower 2 (ddf2)的基因定位与候选基因分析[D];西南大学;2015年
9 徐金刚;水稻光氧化突变体812HS叶片光合和抗氧化特性的研究[D];南京师范大学;2015年
10 毕炀辉;ZNF750基因S70X突变体在食管鳞癌发生、发展中的功能研究[D];山西医科大学;2015年
,本文编号:2487878
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/jiyingongcheng/2487878.html