不同滴灌水量和种植方式对盐碱土水盐运移和牧草生长的影响
[Abstract]:Saline-alkali land in Datong Basin of Shanxi Province is an important reserve strategic land resource in our province. It is of great practical significance to solve the shortage of land resources and grain problem in our country and our province. There are more than 3 million mu of saline-alkali soil resources in Datong Basin. The salinization of soil and the scarcity of water resources are one of the important reasons that lead to the unsatisfactory development of local economy and hinder the increase of farmers' income. The drop in the price of drip irrigation facilities and the scarcity of regional water resources make drip irrigation one of the most rapidly developing water-saving irrigation measures in recent years. As a result, drip irrigation has moved from facility agriculture, which was originally used in large greenhouse basins, to research on field food crops and improving the environment of saline-alkali soil cultivation. In this paper, the soil water and salt regulation of drip irrigation was studied on the heavy saline-alkali wasteland of Houzhangbao Village, Shanyin County, Datong Basin, Shanxi Province, and two kinds of forage grasses, sweet clover and alfalfa, were cultivated under the cultivation of flat cropping and ridge tillage. The percentage of evaporation measured in pan was used to control the irrigation amount of drip irrigation. The water and salt migration of sweet clover and first alfalfa soil and plant height of alfalfa and sweet clover were studied under different planting methods and different drip irrigation rates. Relationship between yield and water use efficiency and correlation between conductivity and pH value of saturated mud and different soil-water ratio were studied. The main results are as follows: (1) there is a significant correlation between the conductivity of saturated mud soil in Datong Basin and the conductivity of soil extract at 1:5 of soil-water ratio and 1:1 of soil-water ratio. The linear function model E Ce = 8.2457ECC1: 5-0.2669 R ~ 2 = 0.9461 and ECe = 2.1937EC1: 1: 1: 0.0023 ~ R2N ~ (9639) can be used to fit and convert the quadratic function relation of water ratio on soil to 1:5 and pH value of saturated mud to pHe=0.7489pH1:52-12.919pH15 63.646R _ 2N _ (0.8712). The relation between pH value of soil and water ratio of 1:1 and saturated mud is obtained. The quadratic function relation is pH=0.4464pH1:12-7.32pH1:1 37.965n R2 = 0.90766.The relationship between PHe and pH=0.4464pH1:12-7.32pH1:1 by using the negative logarithm method of hydrogen ion is: pHe1g (0.2448 脳 10pH1:1 107) R2 0.9621; the relationship between pH and pHe with the ratio of soil to water is 1:5; the relationship between pH and pHe is:% pHe1g (0.2353 脳 10pH1:5-108) R2 0.8559m3) in saline soil or in saline soil. In alkaline soils, To test electrical conductivity and pH value, it is recommended that saturated mud extraction solution be used to reduce the error caused by weak electrolyte CO32- and HCO3- conversion, but if there is no condition to prepare saturated mud extract solution or time is short, It was suggested that the soil-water ratio of 1:1 should be used in the extraction solution 4) by comparing the effects of different planting methods on the leaching of soil salt, it was found that the effect of ridge cropping on leaching salt was better than that of flat cropping, but the difference in yield was not obvious. Therefore, it is suggested that ridge planting can be adopted in heavy saline-alkali soil areas. Irrigation at seedling emergence stage can do salt leaching better than horizontal cropping, but salt tolerance of crops at seedling stage is the weakest. The results showed that in the range of infiltration water, 50% of evaporation every 3 days had the best effect on soil leaching, and the yield of first alfalfa and sweet clover were the highest. The highest water use efficiency (Wue) was 30% in ridge cropping and 50% in flat cropping.) under the same irrigation amount, the plant height and yield of sweet clover were significantly higher than that of alfalfa.
【学位授予单位】:太原理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S156.4;S54
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 袁玉江;利用树轮车表重建和预测天山北坡牧草产量[J];干旱区资源与环境;1989年01期
2 李慧英;;水热条件对牧草产量的影响[J];新疆气象;1988年05期
3 潘伯荣;尹林克;王烨;;三种沙漠牧草的引种比较[J];干旱区研究;1991年02期
4 徐德源;王淑民;林柯;李星华;;天山北坡牧草的光谱特征[J];新疆气象;1991年09期
5 黄敬峰;李建龙;;天山北坡冬草场牧草产量与气象条件的统计分析[J];植物生态学与地植物学学报;1992年03期
6 杜卫华;牧草产量预报模型初探[J];新疆气象;1996年03期
7 孙长东;牧草与气象服务[J];新疆气象;1997年06期
8 颜亮东;李凤霞;伏洋;黄胜;;2004年青海省生态环境监测点内外牧草生长状况对比分析[J];青海气象;2005年04期
9 祁如英;李应业;魏永林;赵隆香;;青海牧区近10年牧草产量变化与气象条件的关系[J];气象科技;2011年03期
10 幺文;唐红艳;;气候条件对典型草原牧草生长发育影响浅析[J];中国野生植物资源;2012年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 张英俊;王明利;黄顶;杨富裕;;我国牧草产业发展趋势与技术需求[A];2012第二届中国草业大会论文集[C];2012年
2 张英俊;王明利;黄顶;杨富裕;;我国牧草产业发展趋势与技术需求[A];第四届(2011)中国苜蓿发展大会论文集[C];2011年
3 胡胜平;;果树牧草间种模式初探[A];四川草业科技十年进展[C];2004年
4 李翔宏;欧阳延生;裘大堂;叶华;于徐根;戴征煌;刘水华;;江西牧草饲料产业化发展研究[A];中国草学会饲料生产委员会2007年会暨第十四次学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
5 温方;陶雅;孙启忠;;影响牧草再生性因素分析[A];2006中国草业发展论坛论文集[C];2006年
6 岳茂山;李毓堂;;牧草(青饲料)烘干加工科技创新和发展前景[A];第十三届中国科协年会第17分会场——城乡一体化与“三农”创新发展研讨会论文集(下)[C];2011年
7 程昌平;程鸿;申修明;;应用翠竹植物生长剂提高牧草产量试验示范研究报告[A];第三届全国饲料营养学术研讨会论文集[C];1998年
8 孙启忠;丁国庆;;有机肥SustainGro对牧草产量影响的试验[A];2006中国草业发展论坛论文集[C];2006年
9 谢建国;;农区牧草产业发展现状及建议[A];河北省畜牧兽医科技创新论坛论文集[C];2007年
10 邓维金;李水根;;南方低山丘陵牧草保护播种技术探讨[A];福建省科协第七届学术年会分会场——“坚持科技创新,,建设海西现代畜牧业”研讨会论文集[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 王欣;内蒙古牧草长势喜忧参半[N];中国畜牧兽医报;2005年
2 记者 王国英 通讯员 魏兴杰;中东部牧草最高产量 每公顷5000千克[N];内蒙古日报(汉);2011年
3 ;牧草常见的虫害[N];中国畜牧兽医报;2007年
4 山东省临沐县畜牧局 张德晨 张丽;牧草越冬后的管理要点[N];中国畜牧水产报;2001年
5 翟桂玉;牧草的科学播种技术[N];中国畜牧报;2002年
6 书仁;健宝牧草的利用途径[N];农民日报;2002年
7 陈潇 范建;牧草产业体系大联合 牛羊吃的有指望[N];科技日报;2009年
8 张丽娜;内蒙古牧草产量总体比历年偏高[N];西部时报;2013年
9 吴锁柱;河北牧草饲料体系建设实现新突破[N];中国畜牧报;2004年
10 玉才;怎样将牧草调制成干草[N];中国畜牧报;2002年
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 张健;三峡库区牧草种植区划及适生牧草栽培利用技术研究[D];西南大学;2007年
2 文石林;红壤丘陵区耐酸牧草筛选与铝毒控制技术研究[D];湖南农业大学;2012年
3 孙娟;基于GIS的牧草适应性及其在退耕还草决策支持系统中的应用研究[D];甘肃农业大学;2004年
4 徐炳成;半干旱黄土丘陵区牧草生产力与生态适应性研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 岳淑芳;不同模式豆—禾混播草地牧草光合生理生态特性及种间关系的研究[D];宁夏大学;2015年
2 刘成名;石漠化治理区抗旱性牧草筛选种植技术与示范[D];贵州师范大学;2015年
3 任灵;青藏高原高寒草甸土壤与牧草养分在不同培育措施下的季节动态研究[D];甘肃农业大学;2016年
4 张俞;喀斯特石漠化草地营养优化配置与牛羊健康养殖技术示范[D];贵州师范大学;2016年
5 康清;高寒草地土壤氮素及高寒牧草对土壤氮素吸收特征研究[D];青海师范大学;2016年
6 黄嵘峥;放牧绵羊采食量的季节变化及营养盈缺的研究[D];石河子大学;2016年
7 郝希超;铀污染土壤牧草—微生物联合修复工艺研究[D];西南科技大学;2016年
8 刘芳;冬闲田种植不同牧草的产量、品质及改土效果研究[D];湖南农业大学;2016年
9 杨庆;施肥对两种决明属牧草农艺性状和土壤可溶性氮素的影响[D];福建农林大学;2017年
10 张盼盼;东苏旗不同季节牧草对放牧羊瘤胃内环境及血液生理生化指标的影响[D];内蒙古农业大学;2017年
本文编号:2207679
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2207679.html