当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 水利工程论文 >

哈姆山堰塞湖安全评价与综合治理研究

发布时间:2019-04-01 06:47
【摘要】:汶川“5.12”大地震不仅在地震影响区内产生大量的崩塌、滑坡地质灾害,而且在整个核心区内形成了多处堰塞湖,库区内边坡变形破坏有不同程度的增加,尤其在哈姆山段变形破坏强烈,山体滑坡对哈姆湖堰塞湖造成了一定损坏,一旦堰体溃决,湖水快速下泄,将直接威胁阿坝藏族羌族自治州群众的生命安全,危险性极大。因此亟需对哈姆山堰塞湖进行安全评估工作,并对其进行治理。本文在哈姆山堰塞湖坝址处多年平均径流深、设计洪水、分期洪水与溃坝洪水等计算成果的基础上,分析了哈姆山堰塞湖溃坝风险。并结合哈姆山堰塞坝坝基、坝肩地质条件,对哈姆山堰塞坝及坝基、坝肩条件做了安全评价,得到如下结论:沿河槽陡坡存在绕渗稳定问题;砂砾卵石与基岩接触界面处可能存在不均匀沉陷现象;左岸坝肩总体稳定,右岸坝肩为右岸崩塌堆积体,但是两岸坝肩存在绕渗问题。本文分别采用经验公式解析法和平面二维有限元数值分析法对堰塞坝坝体进行了渗流稳定分析计算,计算结果表明堰塞坝上下游渗透稳定满足规范要求,沿堰塞坝向河槽绕渗渗透稳定计算结果不满足规范要求,需要进行防渗处理。同时通过对高边坡进行复核计算,表明堰塞坝右岸高边坡P1破碎带范围边坡不稳定,左岸高边坡H01潜在崩塌体不稳定,且H02潜在滑移体不稳定,需要进行加固处理。最后本文根据哈姆山堰塞湖安全评价结果,针对哈姆山堰塞湖存在的问题,提出了综合治理措施,通过方案比选,采用钢筋石笼对堰塞体右岸主河槽进行防洪护砌,右岸采用浆砌石挡墙,达到堰塞坝泄流槽治理的目的。右岸松散堆积体处理采用挡土墙结合坡顶开挖加固方案,防止滑坡体完全堵塞泄槽。本文为我国堰塞湖安全评估与治理的实际案例,对其他类似工程的建设有一定的参考价值,同时进一步完善了堰塞湖安全评估与治理理论及方法,具有一定的学术价值与工程价值。
[Abstract]:The Wenchuan "5.12" earthquake not only produced a large number of collapses and landslides in the earthquake-affected areas, but also formed a number of dammed lakes in the whole core area, and the slope deformation and destruction in the reservoir area increased in varying degrees. Especially in the Hamshan section, the deformation and destruction is strong, and the landslide has caused certain damage to the Hamhu barrier lake. Once the Weir body collapses, the lake water will drain rapidly, which will directly threaten the life safety of the masses in the Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, and it will be very dangerous. Therefore, it is urgent to evaluate the safety of Hamshan dammed lake and to control it. Based on the calculation results of average runoff depth, design flood, phased flood and dam break flood at the dam site of Hamshan dammed lake, the risk of dam break in Hamshan dammed lake is analyzed in this paper. Combined with the geological conditions of the dam foundation and abutment of Hamshan Weir, the safety evaluation of Hamshan dam, dam foundation and abutment conditions is made, and the following conclusions are drawn: there is a problem of seepage stability along the steep slope of the river channel; There may be uneven subsidence at the contact interface between gravel pebbles and bedrock, and the left bank abutment is generally stable, and the right bank abutment is a right bank collapse and accumulation body, but the cross-strait dam abutment has the problem of circumfluence. In this paper, the seepage stability of dam body is analyzed and calculated by empirical formula analysis method and plane two-dimensional finite element numerical analysis method, respectively. The results show that the seepage stability of upper and lower reaches of the dam meets the requirements of the code. The results of seepage stability calculation along the dammed dam into the channel do not meet the requirements of the code and need to be treated with anti-seepage. At the same time, through the calculation of the high slope, it is shown that the slope of the right bank of the dam is unstable in the range of the high slope P1, the potential collapse of the high slope H01 on the left bank is unstable, and the potential sliding body of H02 is unstable, so it is necessary to strengthen the slope. Finally, according to the result of safety evaluation of Hamshan dammed lake and aiming at the problems existing in Hamshan dammed lake, this paper puts forward the comprehensive control measures. Through the scheme comparison and selection, the reinforced stone cage is used to protect the main channel of the right bank of the dammed body for flood control and protection. On the right bank, mortar masonry retaining wall is used to control the discharge channel of dammed dam. In the treatment of loose accumulation on the right bank, retaining wall combined with excavation and reinforcement on the top of the slope is adopted to prevent the landslide body from completely blocking the drain channel. This paper is a practical case of safety assessment and management of dammed lake in our country, and has certain reference value to other similar projects construction. At the same time, the theory and method of safety assessment and management of dammed lake have been further perfected. It has certain academic value and engineering value.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TV882.9

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 ;肖家桥堰塞坝[J];四川水利;2008年04期

2 赵旭珍;李纯乾;;堰塞坝滑坡几率与坝型参数的关系[J];水土保持应用技术;2008年04期

3 刘怀湘;王兆印;刘乐;;河床结构对堰塞坝稳定性的影响研究[J];水力发电学报;2011年03期

4 张康;王兆印;刘怀湘;余国安;;裂点发育及其对堰塞坝的稳定性影响[J];山地学报;2011年04期

5 任强;陈生水;钟启明;曹伟;;堰塞坝的形成机理与溃决风险[J];水利水电科技进展;2011年05期

6 杨阳;曹叔尤;;堰塞坝溃决机理试验研究[J];水利学报;2012年S2期

7 程根伟;范继辉;程尊兰;;四川5·12地震灾区滑坡堰塞坝溃决灾害风险评估[J];西南民族大学学报(自然科学版);2008年06期

8 严祖文;魏迎奇;蔡红;;堰塞坝形成机理及稳定性分析[J];中国地质灾害与防治学报;2009年04期

9 Takahisa Mizuyama;Shigekiyo Tabata;Toshio Mori;Fumito Watanabe;Kimio Inoue4;宋守度;;堰塞坝溃决及防范[J];水利水电技术;2008年07期

10 余国安;王兆印;黄河清;刘怀湘;;崩滑堰塞坝(湖)的地貌环境效应[J];地球科学进展;2010年09期

相关会议论文 前6条

1 石振明;刘思言;彭铭;;堰塞坝坝体材料渗流特性研究现状及展望[A];2014年全国工程地质学术大会论文集[C];2014年

2 施裕兵;巩满福;冯建明;;唐家山堰塞坝泄流后稳定性研究[A];汶川大地震工程震害调查分析与研究[C];2009年

3 朱万强;;唐家山堰塞坝整治方案及相应河段水电开发的设想[A];汶川大地震工程震害调查分析与研究[C];2009年

4 胡卸文;黄润秋;施裕兵;吕小平;朱海勇;汪雪瑞;;唐家山滑坡堵江机制及堰塞坝溃坝模式分析[A];汶川大地震工程震害调查分析与研究[C];2009年

5 朱勇辉;卢金友;范北林;杨文俊;渠庚;;堰塞坝泄流冲刷模型及其在唐家山堰塞湖中的应用[A];中国水利学会2008学术年会论文集(下册)[C];2008年

6 巩满福;;堰塞湖坝体地质结构与稳定性初步分析[A];汶川大地震工程震害调查分析与研究[C];2009年

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 记者 曾实;泄流槽静待悬湖水通过[N];四川日报;2008年

2 记者 方晓哺;要坚持主动处理 及早处理 安全处理[N];四川日报;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 刘宏;雪隆囊古堰塞坝溃决洪水演进数值模拟研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2016年

2 尚殿钧;哈姆山堰塞湖安全评价与综合治理研究[D];吉林大学;2017年

3 王军桥;唐家山堰塞坝形成机制及溃坝模式分析[D];西南交通大学;2010年

4 马菖林;杜家山滑坡致灾机理研究[D];长安大学;2012年



本文编号:2451312

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/shuiwenshuili/2451312.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7e8a6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com