网络作品版权默示许可研究

发布时间：2018-05-31 10:42

本文选题：网络作品版权 + 默示许可　；参考：《中南大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：网络作品版权默示许可的成立多数情况是通过作品的使用人提出明确的要约,版权人随后作出默示的意思而成立；少数情况是由版权人发出明示“授权要约”,而使用人以实际使用行为作出默示的承诺而成立。网络作品版权默示许可不管是如何成立,就其本质而言,就是一种版权许可合同。这种版权许可合同与法定许可合同、强制许可合同等“非自愿许可合同”不同,网络作品版权默示许可合同成立前考虑到了网络作品版权人对于是否禁止他人未经使用进行了考量,网络版权人有选择的余地,所以是一种“自愿性质的版权许可合同"。在当前网络信息时代,确立网络作品版权默示许可有其必要性及可行性,同时更有利于平衡社会公众利益和版权人的利益,促进文化产业的发展。通过中美网络作品版权默示许可的法律实践研究,美国司法实践中在搜索引擎服务的默示许可中得到的“知晓使用”和“鼓励使用”原则是值得我国司法实践中法官进行个案判断来借鉴的。国内关于网络作品版权的默示许可的问题包括：适用范围不确定、网络作品版权人的权利不明确、网络作品版权默示许可合同成立后的报酬支付困难,等等。针对以上情况,笔者提出建议：网络作品版权默示许可需要在互联网领域和其他相关领域适当引入版权默示许可规则,以充分发挥其在促进作品快速传播方面的重要作用,不过同时,我们也应当建立对作者经济利益的特殊保护机制,以避免在默示许可的规则下作者的利益受到损害,譬如赋予网络作品版权人默示许可中的任意解除权,确立网络作品版权入对于报酬的异议权以及版权人的获得报酬权;并确立网络作品版权默示许可的付费标准,引入网络作品版权默示许可集体管理组织,最后赋予法官在司法实践中运用网络作品版权默示许可的自由裁量权。
[Abstract]:In most cases, the establishment of an implied license for copyright in a network work is established through an explicit offer made by the user of the work, and the copyright owner subsequently makes an implied intention; in a few cases, the copyright owner makes an express "offer of authorization". But the user makes the implied promise with the actual use behavior. Copyright implied license of network works, no matter how it is established, is a kind of copyright license contract in essence. This kind of copyright license contract is different from the "involuntary license contract", such as the legal license contract, the compulsory license contract, etc. Before the establishment of the implied license contract for the copyright of a network work, the copyright owner of a network work considered whether or not to prohibit others from using it without using it, and the network copyright owner had a choice, so it was a kind of "voluntary copyright license contract". In the current era of network information, it is necessary and feasible to establish the implied license of copyright of network works, and at the same time, it is more beneficial to balance the interests of the public and copyright holders and to promote the development of cultural industry. Through the legal practice of implied license of copyright in Chinese and American Internet works, The principle of "knowing use" and "encouraging use" obtained in the implied license of search engine service in American judicial practice is worthy of the judge's case judgment in judicial practice in our country. The problems of implied license for copyright of network works in China include: the scope of application is uncertain, the rights of copyright owners of network works are not clear, the payment of remuneration after the establishment of implied license contract for copyright of network works is difficult, and so on. In view of the above situation, the author puts forward some suggestions: the implied copyright license of network works should be properly introduced into the Internet and other relevant fields in order to give full play to its important role in promoting the rapid dissemination of works. However, at the same time, we should also establish a special protection mechanism for the author's economic interests, so as to avoid the harm to the author's interests under the rules of implied license, such as granting the copyright owner the right of arbitrary rescission in the implied license of an online work. It also establishes the right to object to remuneration and the right of copyright owner to obtain remuneration, and establishes the standard of payment for implied license of copyright in network works, and introduces the collective management organization of copyright implied license of network works. Finally, the judge is given the discretion to use copyright implied license in judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】