排污费、环保补助与中国工业两阶段环境效率——来自中国30个省份的经验数据

发布时间：2018-06-16 19:23

本文选题：排污费 + 环保补助　；参考：《生态经济》2016年08期

【摘要】：运用基于SBM的网络DEA方法将污染物治理纳入工业企业环境效率测算,测度了2003~2010年中国30个省份整体环境效率及生产、治理两阶段的环境效率,在此基础上实证研究了排污费和环保补助对工业环境效率的影响。研究结果显示:从全国来看,排污费对工业两阶段环境效率均具有负面影响,但效果并不显著,而环保补助却具有显著积极影响。从分区域来看,东部地区排污费对工业两阶段环境效率均产生显著负面影响,而环保补助对其积极影响并不显著;中部地区排污费对工业两阶段环境效率均产生负面影响,但效果并不显著,而环保补助更显著地提高了生产阶段的环境效率;西部地区排污费对工业两阶段环境效率均产生显著负面影响,而环保补助对其积极影响则源于提高治理阶段环境效率。
[Abstract]:Based on the network DEA method based on SBM, this paper measures the environmental efficiency and production efficiency of 30 provinces in China from 2003 to 2010, and measures the environmental efficiency in the two stages of governance. On this basis, the effects of sewage charges and environmental subsidies on industrial environmental efficiency are studied empirically. The results show that sewage charges have a negative impact on environmental efficiency in both stages of industry, but the effects are not significant, but environmental subsidies have a significant positive impact. From the subregional point of view, the sewage charges in the eastern region have a significant negative impact on the environmental efficiency in both stages of industry, while environmental subsidies have no significant positive impact on the environmental efficiency in the two stages of industry, while the sewage charges in the central region have a negative impact on the environmental efficiency in both stages of industry. However, the effect is not significant, and the environmental subsidy has significantly improved the environmental efficiency in the production stage, and the sewage charges in the western region have a significant negative impact on the environmental efficiency in both stages of industry. The positive effect of environmental subsidy comes from improving environmental efficiency in governance stage.
【作者单位】：合肥工业大学经济学院;合肥工业大学工业信息研究院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(13BSH024) 安徽省科技厅软科学研究计划项目(2014AHSKJ006) 国家自然科学基金项目(71573070)
【分类号】：X32;F424

【相似文献】