环境视角下中国工业效率的测度与分解及影响因素分析

发布时间：2019-04-21 12:05

【摘要】：工业化的快速推进在促进我国经济快速增长的同时,粗放型、低效率的增长方式也带来严重的负面影响,因此,在对我国工业效率进行评价时,需综合考虑工业生产和环境治理的影响,以避免低估工业生产效率造成更高环境破坏代价下的经济增长以及低估环境治理效率造成更高减排成本的经济损失。本文基于1998-2012年全国30个省、市、地区的工业面板数据,通过构建网络DEA模型对我国各地区的工业效率、工业生产效率和环境治理效率进行评价,并运用静态与动态比较的方法对三种效率之间的关系进行了分析。并在此基础之上综合研究了技术因素(技术创新和信息化水平)、制度因素(开放化水平、市场化水平及国有化水平)、结构因素(重型化水平与规模化水平)以及居民消费水平对我国工业效率的影响程度。研究发现：(1)1998-2012年间我国工业生产效率变化较小略微有所上升,而环境治理效率水平提高显著,并在很大程度上促使工业效率水平提升； (2)我国各地区工业企业在进行工业生产的同时也注重保护环境,工业生产效率较高的地区,其环境治理效率也相对较高。 (3)技术因素对我国工业效率具有积极的促进作用,制度的变革是近年来工业效率提高的主要原因,而结构因素正越来越成为我国进一步工业化进程的障碍。最后,在生活水平提高之后,人们更有意愿参与到环境治理中来。
[Abstract]:The rapid promotion of industrialization not only promotes the rapid economic growth of our country, but also brings serious negative effects to the extensive and inefficient growth mode. Therefore, when evaluating the industrial efficiency of our country, The effects of industrial production and environmental governance should be considered comprehensively in order to avoid the economic loss of underestimating the economic growth caused by higher environmental damage and the economic loss of higher emission reduction costs caused by underestimating the efficiency of industrial production. Based on the industrial panel data of 30 provinces, cities and regions in China from 1998 to 2012, this paper evaluates the industrial efficiency, industrial production efficiency and environmental governance efficiency of every region of China by constructing the network DEA model. The relationship among the three efficiency is analyzed by the method of static and dynamic comparison. On this basis, the technical factors (technological innovation and informatization level), institutional factors (open level, marketization level and nationalization level) are comprehensively studied. The influence of structural factors (heavy and large-scale level) and residents' consumption level on China's industrial efficiency. The results are as follows: (1) during 1998 / 2012, the change of industrial production efficiency in China was slightly increased, while the level of environmental governance efficiency increased significantly, and to a great extent, it promoted the improvement of industrial efficiency level; (2) the industrial enterprises in various regions of our country also pay attention to the protection of the environment while carrying on the industrial production, and the environmental management efficiency of the areas with higher industrial production efficiency is also relatively high. (3) the technological factors play a positive role in promoting the industrial efficiency of our country. The reform of the system is the main reason for the improvement of the industrial efficiency in recent years, and the structural factors are becoming more and more obstacles to the further industrialization of our country. Finally, after living standards have improved, people are more willing to participate in environmental governance.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F424

【相似文献】