作品的附带使用制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-16 19:29

本文选题：附带 + 附带使用　；参考：《西南政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 当今社会,极具特色的高档写字楼,体现独特人文气息的大型雕塑雕刻组合,经典的商家广告,公路上疾驰而过的新概念跑车等等无处不在。人们在惊讶其奢华时,往往忽视了它也是享有版权的作品。这些版权作品把我们的生活团团包围住,如果某天我们用镜头或者其他设备来表达个人的某种感受,只要新创作品中涵盖此类物件,就有可能被控侵犯他人权利。我们表达生活感想的愿望或者进一步创作作品的愿望因此而被窒息或者举步维艰。随着科技的发展,作品的使用方式推陈出新,已经超越了当前我国相关法律的调整范围。这一现象引起了国内外学者的广泛关注。目前,为解决该问题许多国家都正在推动附带使用制度的国内立法,有的国家的相关立法已经很完善了,但是我国著作权法中关于作品的附带使用方面还处于一片空白状态。本文通过案件引入附带使用制度,在分析了附带使用制度的现实需求和合理性以及在借鉴其他国家的立法经验的基础上,结合我国著作权作品使用方式调整的立法状况和司法实践,提出了我国作品附带使用的立法,希望借此能够引起立法者和法律专家、学者对该方面的重视,尽快在我国著作权法中构建作品附带使用制度,使作品的创作得以如泉水喷涌,经济得以健康发展。本文除引言和结语外,共分为五部分。第一部分介绍了我国首例涉及作品附带使用的案件——《命运的承诺》,包括了基本案情、案件焦点、争议与分歧意见、引发的思考五部分。通过对案件的分析指出了该案判决的不合理之处,希望引起法律人的思考,并且引出了“附带使用”一词。第二部分通过对“附带使用”一词的含义和性质进行解析,进而介绍版权法中的“附带使用制度”在全球的发展历史和西方主要国家版权法中的“附带使用制度”在司法实践中的适用状况,让读者比较清楚的理解附带使用制度的来龙去脉。再通过把“附带使用”与“暂时复制”和“合理使用制度”做比较,让读者对之有更深刻的认识。第三部分分析了附带使用制度的现实需求和附带使用制度的合理性。通过分析社会生活中附带使用行为的现状和目前案件审理中的尴尬现状,指出了我国在著作权法中确立附带使用制度的必要性。任何一种制度的存在都有其理论依据。通过附带使用制度的哲学分析和经济学分析证明了在我国著作权法中构建附带使用制度的合理性和必要性。第四部分通过对全球各国版权法或者著作权法中附带使用制度之立法例的介绍、对比、分析和总结,大体勾勒出了附带使用制度的内容,然后具体的分析其构成要件,即构成附带使用的作品类型,主观要件以及客观要件。附带使用制度的构成要件分析比较清楚的解决了附带使用是否成立的问题。第五部分通过上述理论基础和司法实践的分析,对构建我国著作权法中的附带使用制度提出了自己的建议。
[Abstract]:In today's society, the highly featured high grade office buildings, the large sculptures and carvings that embody the unique humanistic atmosphere, the classic commercial advertisements, the fast new concept sports cars on the road, and so on. People often ignore that it is also a copyrighted work when they are extravagant. These copyrighted works encircled our life. If one day we use a lens or other equipment to express a personal feeling, as long as a new creation covers such objects, it is possible to be accused of violating the rights of others. It has transcended the current adjustment of relevant laws in China. This phenomenon has aroused wide attention of scholars both at home and abroad. At present, in order to solve the problem, many countries are promoting the domestic legislation of the incidental use system, and the relevant legislation in some countries has been perfected, but the copyright law of our country is about to do it. The incidental use of the product is still in a blank state. This article introduces the system of incidental use through the case, analyzes the realistic demand and rationality of the incidental use system, and on the basis of reference to the legislative experience of other countries, and combines the legislative situation and judicial practice of the use mode of our copyright works, and puts forward our country. The legislation that is used incidental to the work is hoped to cause the legislator and the legal expert, the scholar to pay attention to this aspect, to construct the work incidental system in the copyright law of our country as soon as possible, so that the creation of the works can be spewed up like the spring water, and the economy can develop healthily.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five parts.
The first part introduces the first case involving the incidental use of the works in our country, the promise of fate, which includes five parts of the basic case, the focus of the case, the dispute and the disagreement, and the thought of the case, and points out the unreasonable of the case by the analysis of the case, and hopes to lead to the thinking of the legal person, and leads to the "incidental use". "A word.
The second part analyzes the meaning and nature of the word "incidental use", and then introduces the application of the "incidental use system" in the global development history and the "incidental use system" in the copyright law of the western major countries in the copyright law, so that the reader can understand the incidental use system more clearly. By comparing the "collateral use" with "temporary duplication" and "fair use system", readers can have a deeper understanding of the dragon.
The third part analyzes the actual demand of the incidental use system and the rationality of the incidental use system. Through the analysis of the present situation of the incidental use behavior in the social life and the embarrassing situation in the case trial, it points out the necessity of establishing the incidental use system in the copyright law of our country. According to the philosophical analysis and economic analysis of the collateral use system, it is proved that it is reasonable and necessary to construct the collateral use system in our copyright law.
The fourth part, through the introduction, comparison, analysis and summary of the legislation of the incidental use of copyright law or copyright law in the world, outlines the contents of the incidental use system, and then analyzes its constituent elements concretely, that is, the types of works that are used in incidental use, the subjective elements and the objective elements. The analysis of constitutive requirements clears up the question of whether the collateral usage is valid.
The fifth part, through the analysis of the above theoretical basis and judicial practice, puts forward some suggestions for the construction of the collateral use system in China's copyright law.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】