新时期中国共产党党员退出机制探析
发布时间:2018-01-19 18:49
本文关键词: 中国共产党 新时期党员退出机制 党员质量 出处:《华中师范大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:本研究在掌握丰富资料的基础上,分析了新时期中国共产党党员退出机制的理论基础、当前取得的成效、存在的问题及其优化原则与路径,旨在揭示出新时期中国共产党自身建设的新角度与着力点,以促使党的建设能够更加科学化、更加规范化、更加制度化。第一部分是理论概述。文章廓清了新时期中国共产党党员退出机制的科学内涵,在比较1978年前后中国共产党党员退出机制的过程中指出了新时期党员退出机制的特点与优势,并追溯了马克思主义关于党员吸收与请退的理论渊源,梳理了中国共产党在党员请退方面的理论与实践。第二部分是现状分析。本文首先肯定了新时期党员退出机制取得的成就:党员队伍数量得到控制,质量有所提升;新时期党员退出机制取得了丰富经验;中国共产党的群众基础得到了扩大与强化。然后指出了新时期党员退出机制尚存在的不足之处:系统不完善,程序缺失;考核标准片面,方式单一;请退措施虚置,创新不够;监督严重缺位,合力不足等。第三部分是对策分析。针对新时期中国共产党党员退出机制存在的问题,本部分提出了优化这一机制的基本原则和基本措施。具体而言,新时期党员退出机制的优化要坚持科学性、系统性、权威性、可操作性、创新性和人本性的原则。在操作层面上,要进一步整合系统资源以加强程序衔接、制定考核标准以识别不同党员、创新考核方式以理顺考核程序、创新请退措施以增强制度执行力、拓宽监督渠道以形成监督合力。
[Abstract]:On the basis of abundant information, this study analyzes the theoretical basis of the withdrawal mechanism of CPC members in the new period, the current achievements, the existing problems and the optimization principles and paths. The aim is to reveal the new angle and focus of the CPC's own construction in the new period, so as to promote the Party's construction to be more scientific and standardized. The first part is an overview of the theory. The article clarifies the scientific connotation of the withdrawal mechanism of CPC members in the new period. In the process of comparing the withdrawal mechanism of CPC members around 1978, this paper points out the characteristics and advantages of the withdrawal mechanism of CPC members in the new period, and traces the theoretical origins of Marxism on the absorption and withdrawal of Party members. The second part is the analysis of the current situation. Firstly, this paper affirms the achievements of the withdrawal mechanism of party members in the new period: the number of party members is controlled. Improved quality; The exiting mechanism of Party members in the new period has gained rich experience; The mass base of the Communist Party of China has been expanded and strengthened, and then pointed out the deficiencies of the withdrawal mechanism of the Party members in the new period: the system is not perfect, the procedure is missing; The assessment standard is one-sided and the way is single; Please step back measures empty, innovation is not enough; The third part is the countermeasure analysis. Aiming at the problems existing in the exiting mechanism of CPC members in the new period. This part puts forward the basic principles and measures to optimize this mechanism. Specifically, the optimization of the withdrawal mechanism of party members in the new period should be scientific, systematic, authoritative and operational. The principle of innovation and human nature. At the operational level, we should further integrate the system resources to strengthen the convergence of procedures, establish assessment standards to identify different party members, and innovate assessment methods to rationalize the assessment procedures. Innovative measures to strengthen the implementation of the system, to broaden the channels of supervision to form a supervisory force.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D262.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 张卫海;;社会管理创新视域中农村基层党组织社会整合功能研究[J];甘肃理论学刊;2012年05期
2 刘红凛;;党的纯洁性建设的时代要求与制度保障[J];南京政治学院学报;2012年05期
3 李娟;佘湘;;不合格党员退出机制研究——基于绍兴市打通党员“出口”的实践[J];理论探索;2012年06期
4 于英丽;;“党员的质量重于数量”论断的时代价值探析[J];北京警察学院学报;2013年04期
5 ;不合格党员的“退路”[J];廉政w,
本文编号:1445115
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/1445115.html